Website evaluation

  • 388 views
Uploaded on

 

More in: Education , Spiritual
  • Full Name Full Name Comment goes here.
    Are you sure you want to
    Your message goes here
    Be the first to comment
    Be the first to like this
No Downloads

Views

Total Views
388
On Slideshare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
1

Actions

Shares
Downloads
1
Comments
0
Likes
0

Embeds 0

No embeds

Report content

Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
    No notes for slide

Transcript

  • 1. By Mrs. Rannowhttp://www.liveoutloudproductionstudio.com/webdesignimages/website-evaluation.jpg
  • 2.  You should be checking 5 things to determine if a website will be valuable to your research: Currency Authority Accuracy Relevance Point of View
  • 3. On a Good Page: On a Bad Page:It was produced  The page was notrecently. produced recently. The page was notIt was updated updated recently.recently.  The links are notThe links are current. current.There are few or no  Many links are dead.dead links. The information on the page is outdated.The information on thepage is up-to-date.
  • 4. On a Good Page: On a Bad Page:The author is separate  The webmaster is thefrom the webmaster. only name listed, if any areThe site is hosted by a listed at all.reputable group (.gov,  The site is not hosted by.edu) a reputable group.  The site is not sponsoredThe site is sponsored by a known group orby a recognized group organization.or organization.  The source is unreliable.The source of theinformation is reliable.  If there is an author, no credentials are listed.The site has receivedawards.
  • 5. On a Good Page: On a Bad Page:You can find the author.  You can’t figure out who wrote theThe information is information.accurate.  The information is notThe document was accurate.written for informational  The document waspurposes. written to inflame orThe author is qualified to incite.write about the topic.  The person writing theThere is a way to contact document does not havethe author. expertise in the field.  If there is an author, there is no way to contact
  • 6. On a Good Page: On a Bad Page:The title of the page  The title does notclearly represents the represent the contents.contents.  The links do not matchThe links make sense on the content of the page.the page.  There are more images than text.There is a balance  The information is notbetween the text and the cited.images.  The information is notThere is a bibliography. accurate and/or does notThe page contains match your purpose.accurate information that isuseful for your purpose.
  • 7. On a Good Page: On a Bad Page:The information provides  The information isboth points of view. slanted. You can verify the  You can’t verify theinformation elsewhere. information is factual.  Opinions are expressed If there are opinions in an inflammatory way.expressed, they are expressed  The site is a mask forin such a way as not to be advertising.inflammatory.  Those that link to theThe site is not a mask for site are not reputable.advertising.Other people andorganizations who link to thesite are reputable.
  • 8. Currency: If your page is current and updated regularly and thelinks are up-to-date and…Authority: If your page lists the author’s credentials and itsdomain is a preferred one and…Accuracy: If your page lists an author who is qualified and who canbe contacted and has information that fits your purpose and…Relevance: The title and links make sense on the page, there is abibliography and accurate information with a balance of picturesand…Point of View: If your page provides unbiased information withlimited advertising and it presents both points of view then…
  • 9. Kapoun, Jim. "Teaching undergrads WEB evaluation: A guide for library instruction." C&RL News (July/August 1998): 522-523