• Like

Loading…

Flash Player 9 (or above) is needed to view presentations.
We have detected that you do not have it on your computer. To install it, go here.

Marlon Dumas @ BPMN 2010

  • 1,260 views
Published

 

Published in Business , Technology
  • Full Name Full Name Comment goes here.
    Are you sure you want to
    Your message goes here
    Be the first to comment
    Be the first to like this
No Downloads

Views

Total Views
1,260
On SlideShare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
3

Actions

Shares
Downloads
30
Comments
0
Likes
0

Embeds 0

No embeds

Report content

Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
    No notes for slide

Transcript

  • 1. Unraveling Unstructured Process Models Marlon Dumas University of Tartu, Estonia Joint work with Artem Polyvyanyy and Luciano García-Bañuelos Invited Talk, BPMN’2010 Workshop, Potsdam, 14 Oct. 2010
  • 2. Poll: Which desk do you prefer? 2
  • 3. Poll: Which model do you prefer? 3
  • 4. The Problem •  Premise: Structured is “better” –  Easier to understand –  Easier to analyze –  Easier to automatically layout –  Easier to abstract (zoom-out) •  We know not all models can be structured… •  Which ones can, which ones can’t? 4
  • 5. Analysis of Structured Models CT = T1+T2+…+ Tm CT = p1T1+p2T2+…+pmTm= CTparallel = Max{T1, T2,…, TM} CT = T/(1-r) 5 Laguna & Marklund (2005): Business Process Modeling, Simulation and Design
  • 6. Automated Layout and Abstraction 6 Wil van der Aalst et al., Process Mining Tutorial
  • 7. A Bit of History 1968 1969 1970s (and 80s) 7
  • 8. 20 years (and 200 papers) later… •  Everything can be structured if you accept to break and continue •  Everyone forgot to release their implementation (they were ashamed since it was full of GOTOs) 8
  • 9. 40 years (and 400 papers) later •  We can structure any BPMN diagram, except: –  “Incorrect” ones –  Cycles with multiple exit points –  Z-structures –  Inclusive join gateways, complex gateways and other demons •  Try it out: http://sep.cs.ut.ee/Main/bpstruct 9
  • 10. Corollary (if you care) •  Any (sound) BPMN model can be transformed into an equivalent (readable) BPEL process definition •  If BPEL had break/continue statements or we use boolean variables to simulate break/continue statememts •  And the BPMN model does not have inclusive join gateways, complex gateways and other demons •  And some other minor details not worth mentioning 10
  • 11. Behavioral Equivalence Weakly Fully concurrent bisimilar bisimilar (FCB) Preserves the level of concurrency in a process model Sequential simulation of a process model 11
  • 12. Starting Point – Process Structure Tree 12 Johnson et al. (PLDI’1994), Vanhatalo et al. (BPM’2008)
  • 13. Taxonomy of Process Fragments ■  Trivials, polygons, and bonds are structured fragments ■  Rigids are “unstructured” 13 13
  • 14. Homogeneous XOR Rigid 14
  • 15. Homogeneous AND Rigid 15
  • 16. Block-structured version… 16
  • 17. Homogeneous AND Rigid that cannot be structured •  Causal rules: –  {A, B}  { C } –  { B }  { D } •  Overlap on the left-hand side of the rules
  • 18. Compare to this… •  Causal relations –  {A, B}  {C, D}
  • 19. Heterogeneous Acyclic Rigid 19
  • 20. Equivalent Structured Fragment 20
  • 21. The Key Ingredient: Unfoldings An unfolding is a representation of a net without “merge” points A complete prefix unfolding is a finite initial part of the unfolding that contains full information about the reachable states 21
  • 22. Ordering Relations A>C1 D2||C2 A#D2 B#A C2||D2 B>D2 ■  Two transitions of an occurrence net are in one of the following relations: □  A and B are in causal relation (A>B), iff there exists a path from A to B □  A and B are in conflict (A#B), iff there are two transitions t1, t2 that share an input place and there is a path from t1 to A and a path from t2 to B □  A and B are in concurrency (A||B) relation iff A and B are neither in causal, nor in conflict relation 22
  • 23. FCB and Ordering Relations Two process models are FCB-equivalent … … if and only if, (complete prefix) unfoldings of both models expose same ordering relations 23
  • 24. Structuring Process Models Compute ordering relations of the (unstructured) process model Construct a block-structured process model from ordering relations 24
  • 25. Ordering Relations Graph An ordering relations graph 25
  • 26. Modular Decomposition Tree (MDT)   A module is a set of edges with uniform structure ■  A linear (L) module is a total order on a set of nodes of a graph ■  A complete (C) module is a complete graph, or a clique ■  A primitive (P) module is neither trivial, nor linear, nor complete   The MDT is unique and can be computed in linear time The MDT 26
  • 27. Structuring Acyclic Process Models Let G be an ordering relations graph. The MDT of G has no primitive module, iff there exists a well-structured process model W such that G is the ordering relations graph of W. A primitive module 27
  • 28. Heterogeneous Cyclic Rigid 28
  • 29. For further details… Download and try: •  http://sep.cs.ut.ee/Main/bpstruct •  http://code.google.com/p/bpstruct/ Perspectives: •  Analyze •  Decompose (e.g. for distributed execution) •  Refactor (extract duplicate fragments into subprocesses) •  Visualize 29