Iv oss report presenation

265 views

Published on

bas report

Published in: Education
0 Comments
0 Likes
Statistics
Notes
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

No Downloads
Views
Total views
265
On SlideShare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
3
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
2
Comments
0
Likes
0
Embeds 0
No embeds

No notes for slide

Iv oss report presenation

  1. 1. Report of Research oriented OSS LP-English Standard-IV
  2. 2. Objectives • Finding out the saffolding that the teacher needed in the classroom process of English. • Getting a clear idea of the process of giving OSS. • To develop the ability of the trainers for conducting research oriented oss. • Ensuring social support in school accademic activities. • Designing teacher empowerment effectively.
  3. 3. Planning • A BRC Review and planning meeting has been conducted on 8/7/2010 to design the OSS. • In the meeting all the trainers and resource teachers attended and discussed to conduct the research oriented oss smoothly. • Schools were selected and take decision to inform all the schools about this programme.
  4. 4. • Team - English P A John Bosco,BRC Trainer T Joy,BRC Trainer Mini,Resource Teacher Mary Jaisy,Resource Teacher Date Name of School Total No.of pupils Total SC/ST Total CWSN Total Minority Total B G B G B G B G 21/07/10LFUPS Cherthala 19 25 0 0 0 0 0 0 44 22/07/10GHSS Cherthala South 14 25 1 1 39 23/07/10HFLPGS Muttom 0 32 1 1 0 2 32 26/07/10St.Augustine's HS Mararikulam 26 17 0 1 43 Total 59 99 2 3 0 2 0 0 158 • The schools the team visited and the sample
  5. 5. Mode of study and OSS ●The team members discussed with the Headmaster and the teachers of std.IV about the OSS that the team intended to do. ●One of the team members presented the tool to the children with the help of narrtion. ●After finished the test the answer scripts were valued,graded and consolidated by the team members. ●In SRG meeting the findings were shared with the teachers.
  6. 6. 5.Analysis of study Activity 1(Reading aloud) This activity was meant for checking the students' ability to read. Indicators L1-Reads clearly and fluently L2-Reads with difficulty but complete the task of reading L3-Reads with the teachers help L4-Cannot read at all
  7. 7. Result in all category- Reading aloud 41 22 30 7 L1 L2 L3 L4
  8. 8. Boy/Girl category LI L2 L3 L4 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 49 22 22 7 36 24 34 6 Boy Girl
  9. 9. SC/ST category L1 L2 L3 L4 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 20 20 60 0
  10. 10. Urban/Rural L1 L2 L3 L4 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 74 16 10 0 42 12 37 9 38 23 27 12 29 38 31 2 Urban Boys Urban Girls Rural Boys Rural Girls
  11. 11. ●In the area reading aloud pupils are in average position. ●Boys are comparetively better than the girls. ●In the category of SC/ST students 60% are in L3 position. ●Boys of Urban area are in a good position in reading.But in rural area both the boys and girls have to be improved.
  12. 12. Reading comprehension Indicators L1-Reflection of the content comprehended from individual reading fully. L2-Reflection of the content comprehended from individual reading partially L3-No reflection
  13. 13. The result in all category 35 50 15 L1 L2 L3
  14. 14. Boy/Girl Category L1 L2 L3 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 32 46 22 36 53 11 Boy Girl
  15. 15. SC/ST Category Row 1 Row 2 Row 3 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 20 60 20 SC/ST
  16. 16. Urban/Rural L1 L2 L3 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 6 68 26 28 61 11 45 37 18 49 39 12 Urban Boys Urban Girls Rural Boys Rural Girls
  17. 17. ➢In the area reading comprehension pupils are not in a fair stage.Majority of the pupils are in ➢L2 level that means they can only comprehend the idea behind the text partially. ➢15% of the students remain in a stage that they could not reflect any idea.Inability to write ➢may be one of the reasons for this. ➢Pupils in rural area are far better than the pupils in urban area.The L1 level of rural children is 46% and the urban children is 22%.
  18. 18. Assessment of Discourse writing Indicators L1-Write sentences meaningfully L2-Write only few words L3-Write only some alphabets/did not attempt for writing
  19. 19. Result in All Category 25 48 27 L1 L2 L3
  20. 20. Boy/Girl Category L1 L2 L3 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 22 41 37 27 53 20 Boy Girl
  21. 21. SC/ST Category L1 L2 L3 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 20 60 20 SC/ST
  22. 22. Urban/Rural L1 L2 L3 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 11 58 31 13 68 19 25 35 40 45 34 21 Urban Boys Urban Girls Rural Boys Rural Girls
  23. 23. ●In the area discourse writing majority of students are in L2 level that means writing only few words. ●Comparetively Girls are making discourse better than boys. ●45% of boys and 25% of girls in rural area belongs to L1 level where as in urban area it is 11 and 13 respectively.
  24. 24. Some evidences
  25. 25. Some Evidences
  26. 26. Findings ● Though the pupils seemed to listen to the narrative,majority of them could not follow the language well. ● They were merely guessing the idea from gestures and expressions.It may be correct or not. ● At the time of interaction before making discourse the teacher had to spend more time to clear these problems. ● Many of the students could read the passage keeping good pronunciation,stress and intonation
  27. 27. ● There are some students in our classrooms those who cannot read and write English. ● Research oriented OSS will give the clear picture about our classroom processes and current level of the children and it will lead to plan our activities realistically. ● If the OSS team assess the pupils periodicaly,make reports and share it with teachers wiil help to increase the quality of classroom process.
  28. 28. Suggestions ● Narrative can be used as a connecting link to all discourses and activites. ● At the same time teachers must be sensitized for using other triggers such as pictures,animated films etc. ● If it is developed for the teachers will be helpful for better comprehension and language generation.And it can be addressed in training also. ● Periodical assessment of children and seeking remedies on the part of OSS must be continued.
  29. 29. ● The periodical assessment will be helpful for the teachers to realize the facts and for the trainers to find out what help should they provide in the school. ● Extra reading materials in English must be developed for the students.It will be helpful for leading them to read and write easily. ● School wise English clubs and reader's&writers forum should be functioned in all schools. ● Additional activiies like creative workshops,camps etc must be conducted for sc/st,minority and CWSN students.
  30. 30. Follow up Activities ● Organizing and well functioning of English clubs in all schools ● Preparing remedial packages for those who cannot read and write English ● Periodical assessment in the part of OSS will be continued. ● The merrits of the students will be shared with the society.
  31. 31. ● Innovative programmes such as creative reading and writing workshops will be conducted in school level. ● More Try out classes and success evidences must be exhibited in trainings.

×