• Share
  • Email
  • Embed
  • Like
  • Save
  • Private Content
Bonn Juego (2013) Reflections on Methodology for PhD Research in the Social Sciences
 

Bonn Juego (2013) Reflections on Methodology for PhD Research in the Social Sciences

on

  • 861 views

Theories, Concepts and Methods in Development Studies and Sociology ...

Theories, Concepts and Methods in Development Studies and Sociology
(PhD Seminar)

11 February 2013

Research Center on Global Development Studies
Department of Political Science
The Doctoral School of Social Sciences
Aalborg University, Denmark

Statistics

Views

Total Views
861
Views on SlideShare
600
Embed Views
261

Actions

Likes
0
Downloads
0
Comments
0

19 Embeds 261

http://agoodgame.blogspot.dk 202
http://agoodgame.blogspot.com 23
http://www.agoodgame.blogspot.com 7
http://agoodgame.blogspot.co.uk 6
http://www.slashdocs.com 3
http://agoodgame.blogspot.kr 3
http://agoodgame.blogspot.ru 2
http://agoodgame.blogspot.sk 2
http://agoodgame.blogspot.hk 2
http://agoodgame.blogspot.gr 2
http://agoodgame.blogspot.ca 1
http://agoodgame.blogspot.sg 1
http://agoodgame.blogspot.nl 1
http://agoodgame.blogspot.de 1
http://agoodgame.blogspot.ro 1
http://agoodgame.blogspot.com.es 1
http://agoodgame.blogspot.ch 1
http://www.agoodgame.blogspot.ca 1
http://agoodgame.blogspot.co.nz 1
More...

Accessibility

Categories

Upload Details

Uploaded via as Microsoft PowerPoint

Usage Rights

© All Rights Reserved

Report content

Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
  • Full Name Full Name Comment goes here.
    Are you sure you want to
    Your message goes here
    Processing…
Post Comment
Edit your comment

    Bonn Juego (2013) Reflections on Methodology for PhD Research in the Social Sciences Bonn Juego (2013) Reflections on Methodology for PhD Research in the Social Sciences Presentation Transcript

    • Reflections on Methodology forPhD Research in the Social Sciences Bonn Juego Theories, Concepts and Methods in Development Studies and Sociology (PhD Seminar) 11 February 2013 Research Center on Global Development Studies Department of Political Science The Doctoral School of Social Sciences Aalborg University, Denmark
    • Starting Point“ There is no royal road to science, and only those who do not dreadthe fatigue climb of its steep paths have a chance of gaining its luminous summits. ” — Karl Marx 2
    • The ProblematiqueJust ONE main problem – the rest will be sub-questions 3
    • Positivist and Normative Social Science “ What is ” and/or“ What should be ” 4
    • On the Question of Value-free Social Science “ There is no way of studying social reality other than from the viewpoint of human ideals.A ‘disinterested social sciences’ has never existed and, for logical reasons, cannot exist. The value connotations of our main concepts represents our interest in a matter, gives direction to our thoughts and significance to our inferences. The recognition that our very concepts are value-loaded impliesthat they cannot be defined except in terms of political valuations. It is, indeed, on account of scientific stringency that these valuations should be made explicit. ” —Gunnar Myrdal 5
    • Argument or Hypothesis Argument (prove) or Hypothesis (test) 6
    • Objective: Contribution to Knowledge (Original and/or Significant)• Thesis: reading, thinking, researching, writing• Review of Related Literature – To show familiarity with the field – To get leads, ideas, references – To figure out your contribution (niche; value-added)• Importance of having chapter outline and chapter-by-chapter headings asap! 7
    • Conceptual Framework (working with key concepts) Study and Establish RELATIONSHIP– Causality • A causes B. • Independent and Dependent Variables– Correlation • If A is there, B is also there.— Dialectics (from my PhD Thesis) • Interrelations and Contradictions between A, B, C 8
    • From my thesis conclusionDialectical Relationship 9
    • Argumentation (Deductive and/or Inductive) In my thesis:continuous DIALOGUE between Deductive and Inductive Approach (co-evolution) 10
    • Theoretical FrameworkRemember, it is a FRAMEWORK. What? (identify) Why? (justify) HOW? (specify) 11
    • Trade-off Elegance vs Relevance“ The general reader will have to make up his mind, whether he wants simple answers to hisquestions or useful ones — in this as in other economic matters he cannot have both. ” — Joseph Schumpeter 12
    • Empirical Methodology (Qualitative and/or Quantitative)Remember, it is a METHODOLOGY. What? (identify) Why? (justify) HOW? (specify) 13
    • On the ‘Law of Instrument’“ … [I]f the only tool you have is a hammer, … [you] treat everything as if it were a nail. ” 14
    • On Method and Truth• Others validate truth based on using the correct method – neoclassical economics and many other quantitative, mathematics-based researches• But using the correct method is not always equivalent to finding the truth! 15
    • Be patient and kind to yourself! Methodology gets refined — as you do your fieldwork; — as you get acquainted with your data, relevant literatures, and other materials; — and as you write the thesis. 16
    • Good luck! Thank you. Godspeed! Bonn JuegoAalborg University, Denmark