Your SlideShare is downloading. ×
Perspectives on Dissemination of Educational Innovations
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5
×

Thanks for flagging this SlideShare!

Oops! An error has occurred.

×

Introducing the official SlideShare app

Stunning, full-screen experience for iPhone and Android

Text the download link to your phone

Standard text messaging rates apply

Perspectives on Dissemination of Educational Innovations

772
views

Published on

Preliminary results from Report on Disseminating CCLI Educational Innovations including recommendations and interpretations of the results. …

Preliminary results from Report on Disseminating CCLI Educational Innovations including recommendations and interpretations of the results.

This project surveyed ~2,500 CCLI project Principal Investigators (from 1999-2009) to understand their opinions of dissemination of educational innovations. The survey was followed by a workshop in which invited participants discussed the survey results and provided recommendations to improve the dissemination of science, technology, engineering and mathematics projects like those in the U.S. National Science Foundation's Transforming Undergraduate Education in Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics (TUES) program.

Cite as: Muramatsu, B. (2011). Perspectives for Dissemination and Adoption of Educational Innovations in STEM. August 30, 2011.

Published in: Education, Business, Technology

0 Comments
0 Likes
Statistics
Notes
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

No Downloads
Views
Total Views
772
On Slideshare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
1
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
7
Comments
0
Likes
0
Embeds 0
No embeds

Report content
Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
No notes for slide
  • Citation: Muramatsu, B. (2011). Perspectives for Dissemination and Adoption of Educational Innovations in STEM. August 30, 2011.Unless otherwise specified, this work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution3.0 United States License.
  • Citation: Muramatsu, B. (2011). Perspectives for Dissemination and Adoption of Educational Innovations in STEM. August 30, 2011.Unless otherwise specified, this work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution3.0 United States License.
  • Transcript

    • 1. Perspectives on Dissemination and Adoption of Educational Innovations in STEM
      by Brandon Muramatsu, MIT OEIT
      This presentation based on: McMartin, F., Muramatsu, B. and Tront, J.G. (2010).
      Report on Disseminating CCLI Educational Innovations. Manuscript in Progress.
      Brandon Muramatsu
      mura@mit.edu
      1
      Citation: Muramatsu, B., (2011). Perspectives for Dissemination and Adoption of Educational Innovations in STEM. August 30, 2011.
      Unless otherwise specified, this work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 United States License.
    • 2. Dissemination & Adoption of Educational Innovations: Overview
      Summary from U.S. NSF-funded project reviewing dissemination of CCLI (TUES) grantees
      High-level results
      Dissemination not leading to desired outcomes
      Adoption of innovation is driver for dissemination, but mechanisms used (papers, workshops, websites) aren’t particularly effective.
      Disconnect between Principal Investigators (PIs) and NSF Project Directors (PDs) on what constitutes “successful dissemination”
      2
      Interpretation: What’s typically disseminated is the content and a project’s history, and not the “why” or “how”.
    • 3. Mechanism: Papers (Conference and Journal)
      Papers
      PIs surveyed thought conference papers more effective than journal papers
      But workshop participants observed that the most “successful” dissemination activities reflected the reward system for faculty members
      Most workshop participants did what they “know”—they were less knowledgeable about other potentially “effective” or successful mechanisms
      3
      Survey of ~2500 Principal Investigators (1999-2009), 55% response rate, n=1285
    • 4. Mechanism: Workshops
      Workshops
      About of 50% PIs surveyed thought workshops were successful dissemination methods, to encourage adoption (top box score)
      But NSF PDs surveyed thought workshops were always (100%) successful dissemination methods
      4
      Question to ask: What makes a successful workshop experience to encourage adoption?
      Survey of ~2500 Principal Investigators (1999-2009), 55% response rate, n=1285
      Survey of 28 Project Directors, 50% response rate, n=14
    • 5. Mechanisms: Websites and Social Media
      Websites
      About 50% of PIs surveyed thought that websites are effective means of dissemination
      Few PIs (in the 10% range) thought that contributing to digital collections, NSDL, etc. were effective means of dissemination
      Social Media
      Almost no use of Social Media for dissemination by PIs surveyed
      5
      Interpretation: Static websites do not necessarily match the goal of “adoption of innovation.”
      Survey of ~2500 Principal Investigators (1999-2009), 55% response rate, n=1285
    • 6. Dissemination & Adoption of Educational Innovations:Three Recommendations
      Tell the story of the innovation
      Interpretation: What’s often missing is the “how” and “why” certain choices were made in the design and development, more important than “project background” –or– the “organization”
      Clearly define “dissemination” (from Granting Agency perspective); show many effective models of dissemination so grantees have methods to emulate (or not)
      Interpretation: Understand what’s meant by “dissemination”
      Build dissemination in from the start
      Interpretation: Dissemination of educational innovations is more than presenting on the project at a conference, it’s about guides and support materials to help others use the materials.
      6
      Recommendation
      Share the process of creating the innovation publicly. Keep a “diary” or blog.
    • 7. Some Guiding Questions Regarding Dissemination and Adoption of Educational Innovation
      Ask the following questions:
      Would another professor be interested in implementing my work?
      What would I want or need to help me use this innovation if it was developed by another faculty member?
      More than just content, what else?
      Are we making specific design decisions that unnecessarily complicate adoption or adaptation of this innovation elsewhere?
      7
      Recommendations
    • 8. Perspectives on Dissemination and Adoption of Educational Innovations in STEM
      by Brandon Muramatsu, MIT OEIT
      This presentation based on: McMartin, F., Muramatsu, B. and Tront, J.G. (2010).
      Report on Disseminating CCLI Educational Innovations. Manuscript in Progress.
      Brandon Muramatsu
      mura@mit.edu
      8
      Citation: Muramatsu, B., (2011). Perspectives for Dissemination and Adoption of Educational Innovations in STEM. August 30, 2011.
      Unless otherwise specified, this work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 United States License.