Database State

Loading...

Flash Player 9 (or above) is needed to view presentations.
We have detected that you do not have it on your computer. To install it, go here.

0 comments

Post a comment

    Post a comment
    Embed Video
    Edit your comment Cancel

    Favorites, Groups & Events

    Database State - Presentation Transcript

    1. Database State
    2. Outline
      • UK government systems for identity, health, criminal justice, social security
      • Data protection and human rights standards
      • Designing privacy-friendly e-government systems
    3. Scale of DWP systems Fields Cases System 700 8m Income Support Computer system 9,800 92m Customer Information System 15,500 6.5m Pensions Transformation Programme 1,300 480,000 Customer Management System
    4. Identity management
      • Central National Identity Register of all those over 16 living in UK longer than 3 months with biometrics, biographical data and audit trail
      • ContactPoint database of all 11m children in England and Wales with biographical data and links to services used
      • National Identity Registration Number can be used to link up other databases
    5. National Programme for IT
      • Central Summary Care Records with biographical data, allergies and prescriptions
      • Regional Detailed Care Records
      • Central Secondary Uses Service for administration and research
    6. Criminal justice
      • National DNA Database with 5.1m profiles
      • ONSET system attempts to identify potential young offenders
      • National Fraud Initiative collects much sensitive information but absolved from liability for any confidentiality breaches
      • National ANPR system keeps up to 18bn records pa for up to 5 years
      • Communications database proposed
    7. DP and human rights standards
      • Interference with private life must be based on detailed, clear, precise, foreseeable law ( Copland v UK )
      • Systems must limit access to data to those who have a proportionate requirement for access ( I v Finland )
      • Bleeding-edge states have a particular duty to consider impact of databases upon privacy ( S & Marper v UK )
      • Only 5 of 46 databases reviewed met these standards
    8. Privacy-friendly e-government
      • Privacy Impact Assessments are needed much earlier in policy cycle, and include ECHR compliance checks
      • Sensitive personal information should be kept on local systems and shared only with the subject ’ s consent or for a specific lawful purpose
    9. Final thoughts
      • The UK is a model for how not to do e-government, as the ECtHR is recognising
      • It is dangerous to allow these large centralised databases to proceed in the hope they will later be ruled illegal
      • Governments need to build privacy into systems by design at a much earlier stage
    SlideShare Zeitgeist 2009

    + Ian BrownIan Brown Nominate

    custom

    1095 views, 0 favs, 2 embeds more stats

    Presented at 2nd Privacy Open Space, Berlin, 3 Apr more

    More info about this document

    © All Rights Reserved

    Go to text version

    • Total Views 1095
      • 1084 on SlideShare
      • 11 from embeds
    • Comments 0
    • Favorites 0
    • Downloads 9
    Most viewed embeds
    • 6 views on http://dooooooom.blogspot.com
    • 5 views on http://www.idealgovernment.com

    more

    All embeds
    • 6 views on http://dooooooom.blogspot.com
    • 5 views on http://www.idealgovernment.com

    less

    Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
    Flag as inappropriate

    Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate. If needed, use the feedback form to let us know more details.

    Cancel
    File a copyright complaint
    Having problems? Go to our helpdesk?

    Categories