Bioenergy crop productionhandling pennington

747 views
649 views

Published on

Published in: Technology, Business
0 Comments
1 Like
Statistics
Notes
  • Be the first to comment

No Downloads
Views
Total views
747
On SlideShare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
3
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
12
Comments
0
Likes
1
Embeds 0
No embeds

No notes for slide
  • This slide needs work. Calculations are in question.
  • Bioenergy crop productionhandling pennington

    1. 1. BIOEN2: Bioenergy CropProduction, Handling & Logistics Dennis Pennington – Michigan State University Extension
    2. 2. Agenda• Overview of BION2: Bioenergy Crop Production and Harvesting• Research data from MI• Handling and logistics
    3. 3. BIOEN2: Bioenergy Crops2.1 Analyzing the economics of bioenergy cropproduction• Cost-benefit analysis in farm decision-making• Bioenergy crop budgets• Analyzing potential markets• Federal and state incentive programs for production of biomass
    4. 4. BIOEN2: Bioenergy Crops2.2 Bioenergy Crop Production: a crop by cropanalysis• Crop production – 19 fact sheets – Crop Comparison Matrix• Energy Potential Box
    5. 5. BIOEN2: Bioenergy Crops2.3 Bioenergy Crop Production SustainabilityFactors• Landscape diversity• Carbon Offset Markets• Life Cycle Analysis• Sustainable Management
    6. 6. Switchgrass Biofuel Productivity Trial Variety Trial MiscanthusEstablishment Trial Crop by Crop Analysis Michigan Data Switchgrass Agronomy Trial
    7. 7. Biofuel Productivity Plot Locations • 2009 (6) – Antrim, Barry, Cass, Isab ella, Kalamazoo, Sagina w • 2010 (5) – Alger, Ottawa, Presque Isle, Clinton, St. Joseph • 2011 (7) – Wayne, Kent, Muskegon, Osceola, Otsego, Branch, Lapeer
    8. 8. Funding Partners
    9. 9. CropsPerennial Annual• Switchgrass • Forage sorghum• Miscanthus • Sweet sorghum• Indiangrass • Energy sorghum• Big Bluestem – Photoperiod sensitive• Little Bluestem – Non-PS• Prairie Cordgrass • Corn• Reed Canarygrass • Canola • Oriental mustard • Sunflower • Soybean • Pennycress
    10. 10. Wildlife damage
    11. 11. Frost damage on switchgrass
    12. 12. LodgingSweet sorghum – Clinton CountyAugust 6, 2010
    13. 13. Lodging Cass County November 9, 2010 Big Bluestem Indiangrass
    14. 14. Weed ControlSunflowers (and ragweed!) – Clinton Co. June 1, 2010
    15. 15. Cass County (Edward Lowe Foundation) 2010 2011 Yield1 Ethanol2 Yield1 Ethanol2 Switchgrass 3.57 303.5 7.28 618.8 a Indiangrass 5.02 426.7 6.97 592.5 ab Miscanthus 3.77 320.5 6.56 557.6 ab Big Bluestem 3.07 261.0 3.43 291.6 b1 tons of dry matter/acre2 tons/acre X 85 gal/ton = gal of ethanol/acre3 Ethanol yield calculated at 2.8 gallons per bushel for corn grain.
    16. 16. Kellogg Biological Station 2009 2010 2011 Yield1 Ethanol2 Yield1 Ethanol2 Yield1 Ethanol2 Canola (lbs/a) - - 121.6 - 467.4 - Oriental mustard (lbs/a) - - - - 179.3 - Sweet Sorghum 13.37 1136.5 7.66 651.1 7.32 622.2 Energy sorghum (PS) - - 8.53 725.1 7.64 649.4 Energy sorghum (non-PS) - - 10.9 924.0 7.55 641.8 Switchgrass - - 4.42 375.7 5.31 451.4 Miscanthus - - 4.4 373.2 7.80 663.0 Indiangrass - - 3.5 300.9 4.60 391.0 Big bluestem - - 2.6 221.9 2.51 213.4 Little bluestem - - - - 1.48 125.8 Reed Canarygrass - - 1.9 163.2 2.53 215.1 Forage sorghum 6.63 563.6 4.9 418.2 4.16 353.6 Corn grain 108.3 303.24 - - - - Corn stover 3.13 266.1 - - - -1 tons of dry matter/acre2 tons/acre X 85 gal/ton = gal of ethanol/acre3 Ethanol yield cacluated at 2.8 gallons per bushel for corn grain.
    17. 17. Energy Sorghum High Biomass Sorghum Photoperiod Sensitive Sorghum12-13 foot tall 14-15 foot tallProduced seed head No seed head10.87 tons DM per acre 8.53 tons DM per acreKBS KBS
    18. 18. Ottawa County (GVSU) 2010 2011 Yield1 Ethanol2 Yield1 Ethanol2Switchgrass 1.9 161.5 6.48 550.8Miscanthus 2.88 244.8 8.96 761.6Sweet Sorghum 6.7 572.1 - -Corn grain 68.0 190.4 - -Corn stover 3.6 303.5 - -1 tons of dry matter/acre2 tons/acre X 85 gal/ton = gal of ethanol/acre3 Ethanol yield cacluated at 2.8 gallons per bushel for corn grain.
    19. 19. Ottawa County (GVSU)
    20. 20. Miscanthus Establishment• Purpose: compare transplants started in greenhouse to planting bare rhizomes in non- irrigated soil• Treatments: – m-root = bare root planted directly in soil – m-trans = live plant grown for 8 weeks in greenhouse In partnership with and funded by the Energy Biosciences Institute at the University of Illinois.
    21. 21. Miscanthus transplants
    22. 22. Miscanthus Establishment 35 30 25Percent Mortality 20 m-root 15 m-trans 10 5 0 2009 2010 2011
    23. 23. Miscanthus Establishment 60 49.1 50 40 37.1Tillers per Plant 35.6 30 m-root m-trans 20 18.6 10 0 2009 2010
    24. 24. Miscanthus Establishment 25.0Yield (Dry Matter Tons per Acre) 20.43 20.0 15.0 13.84 m-root 10.19 10.0 8.33 m-trans 6.52 5.0 3.72 3.98 1.53 0.0 2009 2010 2011 Total
    25. 25. Switchgrass Variety Trial (KBS) Yield (tons DM/acre) Ecotype Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Alamo L a 3.59 3.87 Blackwell U a 4.51 4.67 Cave-in-Rock U a 4.22 4.48 Dakota U a 1.71 1.81 EG 1101 L 1.44 2.42 - EG 1102 L 2.18 4.08 - EG 2101 U 0.94 2.41 - Kanlow L a 2.62 4.40 NE28 L a 2.53 2.47 Shelter U 0.90 2.12 - Southlow U a 2.44 3.46 Trailblazer U a 2.25 2.30aIn varieties established in 2009, yield data was not collected due to the fact that mowing was needed for weed control.L=lowland ecotype (typically out produces upland, grown in southern states)U=upland ecotype (better overwinter survival in northern states like Michigan)
    26. 26. Handling & Logistics Photo by J.E Doll, MSU
    27. 27. Biomass Feedstock Sources Amount needed to reach U.S. bioenergy goalsForest• Logging residues Forest• Excess timber (fuel treatments)• Fuel wood• Processing residues• Pulping liquors AgriculturalAgricultural• Crop residues• Grains Total• Perennial Grasses• Woody crops• Food processing waste 0 500 1000 1500• Municipal solid waste Million Dry Tons Per Year Source: Biomass as Feedstock for a Bioenergy and Bioproducts Industry: The Technical Feasibility of a Billion-Ton Annual Supply, U.S. Department of Energy and U.S. Department of Agriculture, April 2005.
    28. 28. Density125,000 acres Physical 1000 lbs/(36” x 48” x 96”) = 10.42 lb/ft3115,000 acres Physical 56 lbs/1.24 ft3 = 45.16 lb/ft3
    29. 29. Biomass Field DayVonore, TNOctober 2011
    30. 30. Two Material Handling Systems: Bales
    31. 31. Two Material Handling Systems: Bulk
    32. 32. So which system is better?Bales Bulk• More dense • Less dense - requires• Easier for farmer to handle packing equip for• Cheaper at the farm end transportation • Saves de-twine, de-bale and chop operations at biorefinery • Cheaper at biorefinery
    33. 33. Other issues• Year round supply – can’t deliver all at harvest• Storage on farm – Covered bales – Bunker silo• Equipment cost – baler is much cheaper
    34. 34. Cellulosic Ethanol• How close is it?• 3-5 years?• Poet Ethanol – Reduced energy use, enzyme costs, raw material requirements and capital expenses (Dec. 09) $4.13 $2. 35 Photo by Dr. Cole Gustafson, NDSU
    35. 35. Cellulosic Ethanol• How close is it?• 3-5 years?• Genera Energy• $1.65 cash costs + $0.30 capital costs $2. 00
    36. 36. http://fyi.uwex.edu/biotrainingcenter/ Questions?

    ×