Billy brick edinburgh_2012
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5
×
 

Like this? Share it with your network

Share

Billy brick edinburgh_2012

on

  • 402 views

 

Statistics

Views

Total Views
402
Views on SlideShare
395
Embed Views
7

Actions

Likes
0
Downloads
2
Comments
0

1 Embed 7

https://twitter.com 7

Accessibility

Categories

Upload Details

Uploaded via as Adobe PDF

Usage Rights

© All Rights Reserved

Report content

Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
  • Full Name Full Name Comment goes here.
    Are you sure you want to
    Your message goes here
    Processing…
Post Comment
Edit your comment

Billy brick edinburgh_2012 Presentation Transcript

  • 1. What are the Strengths and Weaknesses of the Language Learning Social Networking Site (SNS) www.busuu.com?Centre for languages, linguistics and area studies (LLAS),The University Council of Modern Languages (UCML) andthe Association of University Language Centres (AULC).John McIntyre Conference Centre, Edinburgh 5th and 6th July 2012 Billy Brick b.brick@coventry.ac.uk Coventry University
  • 2. OverviewWeb 2.0 SNSs: historical contextExamples of SNSs and theirfunctionalityResearch ProjectsResultsFuture directionsDiscussion 2 10/07/2012
  • 3. SNSs for language learning are: ’disruptive technologies’ in that they allow for new and different ways of doing familiar tasks. Godwin-Jones (2005) 3 10/07/2012
  • 4. Principles of Tandem Learning (Little 2003) •Driving force of Tandem Learning Learner •Hands over control of learning to the learner Autonomy •First hand contact with a native speaker of the target language •Equal effort and investment = equal benefitReciprocity •Asynchronous written environment •Synchronous voice environment 4 10/07/2012
  • 5. 5 10/07/2012
  • 6. Language Learning SNS FunctionalityWeb-based, or increasingly app-based Freemium modelSynchronous voice and synchronous andasynchronous text chat and e-mailsContain picture-based learning materialsPeer review of written and spokensubmissionsProfile matching (languages, levels)Motivational tools (berries, league tables,corrector badges) 6 10/07/2012
  • 7. 1 Individual 2 Community learning learning Marcel teach Susanne + native medium teach native beginner  Content based on 150+ different topics (e.g. telling beginner the time, answering the phone, etc..)  Instant video-chat application for direct  Grammar material provided by PONS and Collins conversation between users  Supported by photos and voices of professional  Peer-to-peer correction of writing and voice artists speaking exercises by the community  Language material available in Spanish, German,  Currently around 100,000 unique user visits French, English, Italian, Russian, Turkish, per day and more than 25,000 text Polish, Portuguese, Arabic, Japanese and corrections per day. Mandarinbusuu.com © 2011 7
  • 8. busuu.com is Europe’s largest language learning community with more than 2.5+ million users Growth of community Awards & recognition AlwaysOn Global 250 Winner Today there are European Union innovation more than More than award in language learning 2,500,000 1,600,000 users CeBIT registered users Innovation Award Shortlist best European Website Winner Open Talent Competition Red Herring European Winner 2010 May 08 Jan 09 May 09 Jan 10 May 10 Mar11busuu.com © 2011 8
  • 9. Freemium Model Premium Free  Vocabulary in English, Spanish, French, German, Italian, Russian, Portuguese  Writing exercises  Reading comprehension exercises  Video Chat Application for live-talk  Interactive exams  Audio for more than 3,000 key phrases  Listening comprehension exercises  Printable PDFs for more than 150 units  Access to more than 35 Grammar Units  Audio Podcasts for more than 150 units  Live Video Units  Customized Review  Travel Courses  Voice Recording Feature + more... + Access to detailed Grammar guides!busuu.com © 2011 10
  • 10. busuu.com © 2011 11
  • 11. The Research12 level 3 learners spent 3 months learning German on the site – questionnaires, log sheets and classroom observations. Mostly British aged 21.Similar experiment 12 months later.LLAS e-Symposium Practitioners Workshop - 13 practitioners took part in a 3hr workshop and discussion – questionnaires. Mixed European nationalities aged 25-60. 12 10/07/2012
  • 12. Please suggest any ways in which youthink the www.busuu.com university platform could be improved. “More natural pronunciation and dialogues reflecting current and authentic use of language. Dialogues were stilted and over-Please suggest any ways insame voice playingarticulated, often with the which you think 2 parts which makes ituniversity platform the www.busuu.com hard to follow. It was could be improved. hard to work out how to get into things -unintuitive interface. The tour wasnt enough 24 10/07/2012 to figure out the navigation.”
  • 13. “Exercises and activities for levels higher than B2.” “It is not challenging enoughfor students of A level quality." 25 10/07/2012
  • 14. “In comparing busuu to livemocha, busuu is lessstructured and it is hard to know where to go next sometimes in busuu. Thesite navigation seems a bit chaotic.” 26 10/07/2012
  • 15. “GardenName three things you liked metaphor, the berries and the “Access to a real visual design.” community of learners live chat “Games, chat, peer learning.” reviews” “I wrote a message to an online student and “Instant feedback. he responded very Self-correcting quickly. The length of exercises, social a lesson is good. I like networking.” the frequent tests.” 27 10/07/2012
  • 16. Name three things you didn’t like lesson tooltip hardly “The ever gives an indication of “Danger for the grammar covered. The incorrect tests are too predictable, feedback. Too too easy. It would be good open for possible to have levels C1 and C2 as frauds.” well.” “The level was far too “No way to guarantee basic. My sentences that feedback received got corrected very is accurate and reliable quickly (good!) but Speakers accents on some of the listening tasks sound corrections were artificial.” wrong - there is no 28 10/07/2012 quality control.”
  • 17. 29 10/07/2012
  • 18. Strengths•Basic features free of charge•Immediate peer review and chat with native speakers•Flexibility (anytime, anywhere)•Fun and motivating•Autonomous learning 30 10/07/2012
  • 19. Weaknesses•Lack of expertise from peer feedback•Need to pay for premium content (and higher levels)•Learning materials could be improved (behaviouristic)•Unsolicited advances and inappropriate advertising 31 10/07/2012
  • 20. busuu.com © 2011 32
  • 21. busuu.com © 2011 33
  • 22. 34 10/07/2012
  • 23. Referencesboyd d m, & Ellison N B (2007), „Social networks: Definition, history, and scholarship‟, Journalof Computer-Mediated Communication, vol. 13, no. 1, [online] available fromhttp://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol13/issue1/boyd.ellison.html [23rd May 2011]Brick, B. (2011) How effective are web 2.0 language learning sites in facilitating languagelearning? Compass: The Journal of Learning and Teaching at the University of Greenwich.Issue 3, 57-63Brick, B. (2011) Social Networking Sites and Language Learning. International Journal ofVirtual and Personal Learning Environments. 2 (3) 18-31 (Copyright 2010, IGI Global, www.igi-global.com. Posted by permission of the publisher.) [31st August 2011]Brick, B, (forthcoming 2012) The Role of Social Networking Sites for Language Learning in UKHigher Education: the Views of Learners and Practitioners International Journal of Computer-Assisted Language Learning and TeachingGodwin-Jones, B (2005) Emerging technologies: Skype and Podcasting. Disruptivetechnologies for language learning. Language Learning & Technology, 9(3), 9-12.Guo, S (2010) From printing to Internet, are we advancing in technological application tolanguage learning? British Journal of Educational Technology Vol 41 No 2 E10-E16.Harrison, R . & Thomas, M. (2009) Identity in Online Communities: Social Networking Sitesand Language Learning. International Journal of Emerging Technologies & Society Vol. 7, No.2, 2009, pp: 109 – 124. [Online] available from<http://www.swinburne.edu.au/hosting/ijets/journal/V7N2/pdf/Article4-HarrisonThomas.pdf>[23rd May 2011] 35 10/07/2012
  • 24. Hurd, S (1998) “Too carefully led or too carelessly left alone”? Language Learning Journal,No 17, 70-74 Little, D. (2003) Tandem Language Learning and Learning Autonomy. In Lewis, T. andWalker, L. (eds.), Autonomous language learning in tandem. Sheffield: Academy ElectronicPublicationsLittle, D. (2003) Tandem Language Learning and Learning Autonomy. In Lewis, T. andWalker, L. (eds.), Autonomous language learning in tandem. Sheffield: Academy ElectronicPublicationsMcBride, K (2009) Social-Networking Sites in Foreign Language Classrooms In Lomicka,L., & Lord, G. (Eds.) The next generation: Social networking and online collaboration inforeign language learning . San Marcos, TX: CALICO Book SeriesMullen, T., Appel, C & Shanklin, T. (2009). Skypebased tandem language learning and web2.0. In M. Thomas (Ed.), Handbook of research on Web 2.0 and second language learning(pp. 101–118). Hershey, PA: Igi Global. 36 10/07/2012