Your SlideShare is downloading. ×
0
Let The Response Fit The Scandal
Let The Response Fit The Scandal
Let The Response Fit The Scandal
Let The Response Fit The Scandal
Let The Response Fit The Scandal
Let The Response Fit The Scandal
Let The Response Fit The Scandal
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5
×

Thanks for flagging this SlideShare!

Oops! An error has occurred.

×
Saving this for later? Get the SlideShare app to save on your phone or tablet. Read anywhere, anytime – even offline.
Text the download link to your phone
Standard text messaging rates apply

Let The Response Fit The Scandal

319

Published on

0 Comments
0 Likes
Statistics
Notes
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

No Downloads
Views
Total Views
319
On Slideshare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
1
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
5
Comments
0
Likes
0
Embeds 0
No embeds

Report content
Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
No notes for slide
  • Alice M. Tybout is the Harold T. Martin Professor of Marketing at Northwestern University’s Kellogg School of Management in Evanston, Illinois. She is a coauthor of “Three Questions You Need to Ask About Your Brand” (HBR September 2002).Michelle Roehm is the senior associate dean of faculty and the Board of Visitors Professor of Marketing at Wake Forest University in Winston-Salem, North Carolina.
  • Several dairies, in turn, negligently allowed distribution of tainted milk products. All this was aided by lax oversight fromChinese quality-control officials and local government officers. Finally, global manufacturing companies such as Heinz, Mars, and Unilever becameunwitting accomplices as they manufactured and distributed food items carrying the poisoned dairy ingredients.
  • When Vioxx was linked to elevated cardiovascular risk and Merck was forced to withdraw it from the market in 2004, Pfizer sought to capitalize on the scandal by positioning its COX-2 inhibitor, Celebrex, as a safer alternativeStep 2: Trend Micro’s flawed virus soft ware update immobilized customers’ computers, Akihiko Omikawa, EVP for Japan, responded quickly. Within an hour and a half, the company had removed the flawed fi le from its website and update servers, expanded its customer support staff ,and held a press conference to apologize to customers and describe how the problem was being addressed.Johnson & Johnson halted production and recalled 31 million bottles of the product. Corporate officials appearedon TV programs such as 60 Minutes and NightlineXuzhou Anying Biologic Technology Development Company, a Chinese supplier of wheat gluten used in the food, pet food scandal of 2007, which has tragic parallels with the 2008 dairy debacle. At least 1,950 cats and 2,200 dogs died of renal failure, purportedly after consuming pet food containing melamine –Customers fi led a lawsuit that resulted in a $24 million settlement in May 2008.
  • Trend Micro’s antivirus and internet security soft ware products, for example, claim to provide companies the most comprehensive
  • Transcript

    1. Let the Response Fit the Scandal Presented By : Bijoy E.V (bijoyev@yahoo.com) Venue: IBS-Bangalore Date: 2011 (Dec 18 – Dec 21) Ref: Alice M. Tybout & Michelle Roehm @ HBR Dec 2009
    2. Idea in Brief• A blanket approach to scandal management won’t work. There are too many angles from which scandals might strike.• An effective response is one that’s been calibrated to the characteristics of the brand, the nature of the event, and the parties being blamed.• The authors offer a four-step Framework for crafting just-right reactions. 2
    3. The Scandal effect Clearly, scandals can very easily extend beyond the original perpetrators and affect other companies inthe value chain. They also may spill over to businesses outside the value chain that are viewed as similar to the alleged guilty parties 3
    4. A Framework for Managing Scandals Systematic way to gauge whether they should act immediately or sit tight and wait for the air to clear.Step 1: Assess the incident o The spill over effect – A company’s own good behaviour does not guarantee protection from scandal o The rebound effect. - Public’s attitude toward the original offender may actually become more favourable o The customers’ mind-set.Step 2: Acknowledge the problem o Avoid premature statements related to the cause, focus on the process of investigation, and prevent further harm. 4
    5. A Framework for Managing Scandals• Step 3: Formulate a strategic response o False allegations - allegation is proved false, the company should issue a strong denial o True allegations. - If an alleged wrongdoing proves to be true, addressing it is more complicated and will typically involve some combination of explanation, apology, compensation, and punishment• Step 4: Implement response tactics. o Based on Customers prospective, Put it to see now the negative out come can be avoided • Which issues should be addressed, and at what level of detail? • Who should deliver the response, and with what kind of tone? 5
    6. Closing NoteExecutives cannot rely on preventative measures toprotect them from scandal damage. They must be ready to respond Having an executive crisis team at the ready, a contingency budget set aside for crisis response 6
    7. Thanks! 7

    ×