Your SlideShare is downloading. ×
0
Ilash.1
Ilash.1
Ilash.1
Ilash.1
Ilash.1
Ilash.1
Ilash.1
Ilash.1
Ilash.1
Ilash.1
Ilash.1
Ilash.1
Ilash.1
Ilash.1
Ilash.1
Ilash.1
Ilash.1
Ilash.1
Ilash.1
Ilash.1
Ilash.1
Ilash.1
Ilash.1
Ilash.1
Ilash.1
Ilash.1
Ilash.1
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5
×

Thanks for flagging this SlideShare!

Oops! An error has occurred.

×
Saving this for later? Get the SlideShare app to save on your phone or tablet. Read anywhere, anytime – even offline.
Text the download link to your phone
Standard text messaging rates apply

Ilash.1

686

Published on

0 Comments
0 Likes
Statistics
Notes
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

No Downloads
Views
Total Views
686
On Slideshare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
0
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
11
Comments
0
Likes
0
Embeds 0
No embeds

Report content
Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
No notes for slide
  • About the impact of technology on society. COMMUNICATION and INFORMATION TECHNOLOGIES are changing society. Although Shirky was making reference to what has happened to the traditional publishing media in the las 10 years or so, it could very much apply to higher education institutions. Although Shirky has in mind the traditional publishing press when he wrote this comment I believe it can very much apply to institutions like universities. Society is facing major changes. As Shirky points out in this quotation, institutions that rely on information as their core product are facing major changes. And we have all witnessed the consumers’ pattern changes when it comes to the publishing media. The sales of newspapers have been decreasing in the last few years, whereas the information sites (blogs, e-journals…) have increased
  • A btter understanding of the context
  • University assets for students used to be Content/interaction and accreditation
  • “ Once teaching stops, further learning has to be autonomous. Autonomous learning can be promoted if ‘learning to learn ’ is regarded as an integral part of language learning, so that learners become increasingly aware of the way they learn, the options open to them and the options that best suit them . (…) They can then be brought increasingly to make choices in respect of objectives, materials and working methods in the light of their own needs, motivations, characteristics and resources” From: (CEFRL) Common European Framework of Reference for Languages in http://www.coe.int/T/DG4/Linguistic/Source/Framework_EN.pdf
  • Goal taht is explicity present in the CEFRL
  • To meet these new demands and goals universities and higher education institutions need to be willing to introduce some changes.
  • SO, How can we do it? And here is when we talk about blended learning
  • the term blended learning means different things to different people. Moreover, it can vary in different cultures and countries. Some see these as an advantage, as the term becomes more flexible, but some sees it as its weakness.
  • Augmented: best way for educators that want to start experimenting as it lets them advance at their own pace Blended: online classes can be synchronous (elluminate) or asynchronous
  • Content exposure and additional instructional resources They are all elements that help to develop
  • And this takes us to second challenge that higher education needs to face
  • This particularly important if we want our students to start taking responsability of their own learning process.
  • We need to think that there is a very strong relation between new pedagogical trends based on learning theories like constructivism and more recently connectivism which emphasize the learner’s active role and the Web 2.0 principles In the next slides I will just highlight the aspects from these theories that are connected with what we have been talking about and the way the web 2.0 implements these concepts.
  • In web 2.0 terms = user being actuve and in control of what is happening in the net.
  • Among other characteristics both theories regard Knowledge should be open and meaningful for the learner Translated to the web 2.0 Flow of knowledge with projects like Sense making through the possibility of tagging information
  • All these range of tools that can enable us to be social in all sorts of ways: Textually Orally Visually Aurally encourage learner’s engagement to the learning process And at the same time Foster the developement of new skills in our students while taking an active rol on their own learning. http://www.swinburne.edu.au/hosting/ijets/journal/V7N2/pdf/Article2-Motteram&Sharma.pdf
  • Some extracts that i found while searching information for this presentation fromboth teachers and learners.
  • We need to think that as Motteram and Sharma
  • Teaching successfully with emerging technologies requires from teachers a change on their attitues. So just to finish I would like to live some questions open in the air for us to think about. So that we can provide to our students with learning experiences that will help them develop those necessary skills to become autonomous and long life learners to face with garantees the new information era challenges.
  • Transcript

    • 1. Blended learning: integrating the web to language teaching and learning.
    • 2.
      • “ The more an institution or industry relies on information as its core product, the greater and more complete the change will be”
      • Shirky Here comes everybody
    • 3. Did you know?
    • 4. What has happened?
      • Information
        • Available – OPEN & FREE
        • Exponential – New creation & publishing tools
        • lifespan
      • Communication & Interaction –
        • Easier
        • New communication & interaction tools
          • Global and open
    • 5. PRESSURE in Higher education
        • Content
        • Interaction
        • Accreditation
              • (Siemens & Tittenberger)
    • 6. PRESSURE for Teachers & Learners
      • Need to develop new skills and attitudes:
        • To be up-to-date – SEEK & FILTER relevant information
        • Take an active role in the learning process
        • “ learn to learn” – Autonomous
        • “ LONG LIFE LEARNER”
    • 7. GOALS
      • “ Once teaching stops, further learning has to be autonomous. Autonomous learning can be promoted if ‘learning to learn ’ is regarded as an integral part of language learning, so that learners become increasingly aware of the way they learn, the options open to them and the options that best suit them . (…) They can then be brought increasingly to make choices in respect of objectives, materials and working methods in the light of their own needs, motivations, characteristics and resources”
      • From: (CEFRL) Common European Framework of Reference for Languages in http://www.coe.int/T/DG4/Linguistic/Source/Framework_EN.pdf
    • 8.
      • “ It is a curiosity of technology that it creates new characteristics in old institutions” (Shirky, C. 2008)
    • 9. CHALLENGES for education
      • Develop new teaching approaches that will encourage and nurture the development of the necessary skills and attitudes for teachers and learners to face the new information era with some guarantees.
    • 10. 1. Blended Learning Definitions
    • 11. Blended learning definitions
      • The three most commonly mentioned definitions are:
      • Combining instructional modalities (or delivery media: lectures, conferences, audio…)
      • Combining instructional methods (teacher centered – direct instruction, lecture…/ student centered- cooperative learning, blogs…)
      • Combining online and offline instruction
    • 12. Blended learning definitions
      • Augmented : technology is used to extend physical classroom.
      • Blended : Course is part online (Elluminate, blogs, forums…) part f-2-f.
      • Online : usually offered through closed platforms (Blackboard, Moodle) but also as a combination of blogs, podcast and group based activities
              • (Siemens)
    • 13. Blended learning definitions
      • “ it’s NOT and instructional model based on a General Learning Theory BUT the application of an ecclectic and practical way of thinking.” (Bartolomé)
    • 14. Blended learning definitions
      • Combination of formal delivery instruction and informal learning environments both online and offline .
    • 15. Benefits from Blended instruction:
      • For students :
        • Active learning autonomy
        • Flexibility in using time and resources
        • Encourage interactions among learners.
        • New environments to practice
        • Better results than only f-2-f or online learning
        • life learning skills
      • Sources: http://www.ifets.info/journals/12_3/26.pdf &
      • The US Department of Education: Evaluation of Evidence-Based Practices in Online Learning. A Meta-Analysis and Review of Online Learning Studies (2009)
    • 16. Beneffits from blended instruction:
      • Faculty :
        • More time to spend with students both individually and in smaller groups.
        • Improve quality of interactions with students
        • Allows them to introduce and experiment with technology based instruction and move away from traditional classroom at their own pace.
      • Institutions :
        • Flexibility in scheduling courses
        • Economically viable
        • Improved use of limited resources (expl. Classrooms)
    • 17. BUT…
      • “ Online instruction can give better results only if pedagogy prevails over technology”.
    • 18. CHALLENGES for education
      • Enable a REAL shift from teacher-centered to student-centered approach fostered by the implementation of web-based technology: Web 2.0
    • 19. CONSTRUCTIVISM CONNECTIVISM WEB 2.0
    • 20. ROLE of the LEARNER User as the centre . Centre of the learning experience. Active . Autonomous Centre of the learning experience . Active . Web 2.0 Connectivism Constructivism
    • 21. KNOWLEDGE Open source: Linux, Sharism – (philosophy) OCW (open courseware) Tags – filter and meaning
      • DISTRIBUTED (not located in any given place).
      • Is NETWORKED (WHO you know)
      • Grows (like a plant).
      • OPEN
      • DIVERSE
      • NOT propositional BUT a set of connections formed by actions and experience.
      • Meaningful for the learner
      • “ Capacity to know is more critical than what is currently known”
      • Is CONSTRUCTED through SOCIAL interaction and NEGOTIATED meaning.
      • Previous knowledge as foundation for new learning.
      • Is BUILT.
      • OPEN
      • CONTEXT (determines adequacy of concepts, models…)
      • Meaningful for the learner
      Web 2.0 Connectivism Constructivism
    • 22. LEARNING Web 2.0 Connectivism Constructivism
      • Tools that enable:
      • Conversation
      • Meaning negotiation
      • Collaboration
      • Connectiviness
      • Sense making
      • Information delivery
      • Information retrieval
      • Share information
      • Is social .
      • Rest in DIVERSITY of opinions
      • Based in CONNECTIONS
      • Amplified
      • Aimed TO currency (up-to-date knowledge)
      • Is Decision making
      • Informal Learning
      • Emphasizes the “know WHERE”
      • Is social
      • PROCESS to build meaningful representations.
      • Operates in the ZDP (Zone of Proximal Development – Vigotsky)
      • Emphasizes the HOW over the what .
      • Learning goals are not set in advance – not prespecified
    • 23. Or in the students words…
      • Web 2.0 helps me be and stay connected with my classmates and teachers (…). With Facebook I am able to talk to my classmates outside of class about concepts taught in class.
      • From: http://bgatin.wordpress.com/2009/10/06/connectivism/ &
      • http://www.slideshare.net/kclauson/web-20mediated-blended-learning-separating-fact-from-fiction
    • 24. Some conclusion:
      • “ The nature of Web 2.0 tools make it more likely (…) [that] learners can also find ways of enhancing their learning, too. (…) The nature of the learning environments that most people inhabit – four physical walls (…) – and the enormous possibilities that Web 2.0 tools offer to both teachers and learners, make it inevitable that learning blends will be a feature of the language learning and more general educational landscape in the coming years. [this] will also inevitably have an impact on pedagogical processes (…) and potentially (…) on the ways that humans learn and learn languages in particular.
      • From: http://www.swinburne.edu.au/hosting/ijets/journal/V7N2/pdf/Article2-Motteram&Sharma.pdf
    • 25. Are we ready ?
      • A spirit of experimentation
      • Willingness to engage learners in the creation of learning resources ( co-creation of content )
      • Willingness to “ let go ” of control and content presentation approaches to teaching
      • Tolerance of failure
      • Collaboration between peers
      • Change perception of what is our profession
    • 26.
      • The presentation is available at:
      • http://www.slideshare.net/bibianajou/ilash
    • 27. Other links
      • Shirky, C. (2008) Here comes everybody
      • Siemens, G. Tittenberger, P. (2009) Handook for emerging technologies .
      • Siemens, G. http://it.coe.uga.edu/itforum/paper92/paper92.html
      • Vigotsky, L. (1995) Pensamiento y Lenguaje. Paidós. Barcelona.
      • US Department of Education: Evaluation of Evidence-Based Practices in Online Learning. A Meta-Analysis and Review of Online Learning Studies
      • CCK09 Moodle forum post: http:// ltc.umanitoba.ca/moodle/mod/forum/discuss.php?d =2266

    ×