Bangladesh: likely if authorities know serostatus.
Hungary: possible if advised by authorities.
Jordan: recorded cases of Africans.
Korea (North): reason no treatment.
Kuwait: immediate; no entry with HIV.
Malaysia: possible by law, applies to migrant workers.
Qatar: immediate; incl tourists.
Russia: recorded by NGOs, people with HIV have 3 months to leave.
How are restrictions justified?
People with HIV
a danger to public health
spread the disease
a burden for society & health care budgets (medical migration, poor health care system)
short life expectancy, not contributing to society
HIV comes from outside & we can stop it at border
Does this reflect reality in 2008?
25 years in the epidemic, we know:
HIV is not highly contagious, transmissions are due to specific behaviours (target for intervention)
Safer sex and safer use are everybody’s responsibility
Screening at borders: wrong message, undermining public health efforts on HIV prevention & care.
People facing restrictive measures will hide status, avoid HIV testing & care services.
Statements on public health issue
1987 WHO expert consultation: “ no screening programme of international travellers can prevent the introduction and spread of HIV infection”.
1988 WHO statement : “HIV screening of international travelers would be ineffective, impractical and wasteful…Rather than screening international travelers, resources must be applied to preventing HIV transmission among each population, based on information and education, and with the support of health and social services”.
2008 International Task Team on HIV-related Travel Restrictions:
“ There is no public health rationale for restricting liberty of movement or choice of residence on the grounds of HIV status. […] Therefore, any restriction on these rights based on suspected or real HIV status alone, including HIV screening of international travellers, are discriminatory and cannot be justified by public health concerns.” Source: Susan Timberlake; Senior Human Rights and Law Adviser, IAC Mexico 2008
Recommendation: Drop restrictions based on public health concerns
Although infectious, HIV cannot be transmitted by the mere presence of a positive person or by casual contact
Transmitted through specific behaviors which others can protect against
Restrictive measures may actually undermine prevention and therefore public health efforts
Global Effort to overcome restrictions
Overcome perception that these protect public health
Overcome ignorance, stigma and discrimination that informs restrictions
Ensure equal access to mobility
Ensure entry, stay, residence regulations treat HIV same as comparable health conditions
Support dialogue and joint action by health officials and immigration/justice officials
Expand HIV prevention, treatment, care and support in sending and receiving countries
Students and Health professionals helped reauthorize PEPFAR
Student chapters mobilized Deans and faculty to submit comments during December 2007 public commenting period
In the critical final weeks and days of the reauthorization process, thousands of students and health professionals repeatedly called and wrote and met with targeted legislators to provide them with essential facts about HIV Travel ban
Students kept AIDS in the media
What can students and health professionals do?
Raise awareness
Reach out to media to cover the issue
Speak out during Public Commenting Period for HSS (stay tuned!)
Write a Letter to the Editor
Keep it short and sweet
Pick one or two points that most resonate with you and expand
Include the title of the article
Ex. In response to “Obama Repeals Travel Ban”(1/19), the article fails to mention other steps needed to address the feminization of AIDS.
Include your contact information
Identify yourself as a member of PHR Student Chapter
0 comments
Post a comment