• Share
  • Email
  • Embed
  • Like
  • Save
  • Private Content
Use of Online Educational Social Networking in a School Environment
 

Use of Online Educational Social Networking in a School Environment

on

  • 6,834 views

This is my research presentation for my thesis defense

This is my research presentation for my thesis defense

Statistics

Views

Total Views
6,834
Views on SlideShare
6,822
Embed Views
12

Actions

Likes
9
Downloads
0
Comments
0

1 Embed 12

http://www.slideshare.net 12

Accessibility

Categories

Upload Details

Uploaded via as Adobe PDF

Usage Rights

© All Rights Reserved

Report content

Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
  • Full Name Full Name Comment goes here.
    Are you sure you want to
    Your message goes here
    Processing…
Post Comment
Edit your comment

    Use of Online Educational Social Networking in a School Environment Use of Online Educational Social Networking in a School Environment Presentation Transcript

    • Use of Online Educational Social Networking in a School Environment Bethany V. Smith College of Education, NC State University
    • Does a student-centered online tool, such as Ning, foster knowledge construction through discussion boards more than a class-focused online tool, such as a traditional CMS?
    • Significance
    • Limitations
    • Review of Literature
    • Social Networking
    • boyd & Eliison (2007) define social networking as: web based services that allow individuals to
    • (1) construct a public or semi-public profile within a bounded system
    • (2) articulate a list of other users with whom they share a connection
    • (3) view and traverse their list of connections and those made by others within the system. The nature and nomenclature of these connections may vary from site to site
    • 42,089,200
    • 18-24 40%
    • 25-34 26%
    • Student Use
    • Ellison et al (2007) surveyed 286 students, 94% were users of Facebook.
    • Communication Use • Class work • Lectures • Exams • Vent concerns • Gain clarification on assignment (Selwyn, 2007)
    • Even though they had Blackboard
    • Faculty Use
    • Mazer et al. (2007) reason that the more students understand and connect with their instructors on a personal level, through the vehicle of a SNS, the more intrinsically motivated they are to participate in their class.
    • Hewitt & Forte’s (2006) research revealed that the students perceive Facebook to be primarily “owned” by students, and that faculty use is an intrusion.
    • Several teachers have been rendered unemployed based on their personal MySpace or Facebook pages (Ewbank et al., 2008; Saunders, 2008).
    • Ning: The Walled Garden Approach
    • The “walled garden” is a term coined by former TeleCommunications, Inc. founder, John Malone to describe a closed network that limits subscribers’ choices to a restricted range of content (Van Tassel, 2006)
    • Ning Facebook Comment Wall The Wall Blog Post Status Update Latest Activity News Feed Photos Photos “My Page” Profile Page Friends* Friends Blog Post Notes * Nomenclature may be changed within each respective Ning network
    • The College of Ed Ning was created in the Summer of 2008
    • Distance Education & Discussion Boards
    • “The students have to be convinced of the usefulness of online discussion as a learning tool and be guided to respond and participate in a manner from which they derive optimum benefits. If the students perceive and experience online discussion as a valued process, they will then be more likely to participate actively in it.” Lim and Cheah (2003, p. 34)
    • How effective are discussion boards in engaging students?
    • Peer-to-peer interactions on the other hand have a tendency to not only be more engaging, but also more effective (Grisham & Wolsey, 2006; Rourke & Anderson, 2002)
    • Motivation
    • Keller (1987) ARCS (Attention, Relevance, Confidence, Satisfaction)
    • Song & Keller (1999) utilized the ARCS model for developing computer assisted instructional models and Keller (2008) has recently applied his ARCS model to the field of e- learning and online instructional design.
    • Creating a Community
    • Johnson, Levine, and Smith (2008, p. 15) suggests that after integrating social networks into higher education that the next step is to “build rich, interactive, robust learning communities.”
    • Correia & Davis, 2008). Wenger (2008, p. 1) defines communities of practice as “groups of people who share a concern or passion for something they do and learn how to do it better as they interact regularly.”
    • The Domain: It has an identity defined by a shared domain of interest. Membership therefore implies a commitment to the domain, and therefore a shared competence that distinguishes members from other people
    • The Community: In pursuing their interest in their domain, members engage in joint activities and discussions, help each other, and share information. They build relationships that enable them to learn from each other
    • The Practice: members of a community of practice are practitioners. They develop a shared repertoire of resources: experiences, stories, tools, ways of addressing recurring problems – in short a shared practice.
    • Goos & Bennison (2008) were able to create a community of practice for their student teachers that grew out of their classroom.
    • Methodology
    • Research Question Does a student-centered online tool, such as Ning, foster knowledge construction through discussion boards more than a class-focused online tool, such as Moodle?
    • Null Hypothesis The quality of discussion board postings in the Ning group, as measured by the IAM phase system, is typical of other online classes.
    • Study Design Data Collection Data Analysis Attitudinal Survey Mann-Whitney U test 2-tailed t-test comparison Motivational Survey between both groups Coding of Ning group Discussion Board Postings postings using IAM schema Interview questions Emergence of themes
    • Sample Ning CMS Number of Students 20* 18
    • Attitudinal Survey Ning CMS Total Number of Students 20* 18 38 Number of 18 14 32 Respondents Response Rate 90% 77% 84%
    • Mann-Whitney U yielded no significant differences between groups Z = -3.66, p = .733
    • 4 Constructs # of Items Reliability Communication 5 0.55 Internet Usage 7 0.8 Basic Technical 5 0.75 Skills Advanced Technical 9 0.7 Skills Overall Reliability of 0.90
    • Motivation Survey Ning CMS Total Number of Students 20* 18 38 Number of 12 9 21 Respondents Response Rate 60% 50% 55%
    • Independent Samples t-test yielded no statistical significance between groups. t(19) = .241, p=.812
    • 400 Discussion Board Postings
    • Interaction Analysis Model Gunawardena, C. N., Lowe, C., & Anderson, T. (1997)
    • Phase I Sharing and comparing of information
    • Phase II Discovery and exploration of dissonance or inconsistency among participants
    • Phase III Negotiation of meaning or knowledge co-construction:
    • Phase IV Testing and modification
    • Phase V Phrasing of agreement and applications of newly constructed meaning
    • Week 8
    • Number of Phase Percentage Postings Phase I 4 28% Phase II 7 50% Phase III 2 14% Phase IV 2 7% Phase V 1 0.06%
    • Started by a Student
    • Controversial Topic
    • Interviews Prior Participant Group Gender Position SNS Doctoral Participant 04 Ning F Y Student Participant 22 CMS F Tech Teacher Y Doctoral Participant 23 Neither F Y Student Participant 24 CMS M Tech Teacher Y Participant 03 Ning F CTE Teacher N Participant 14 Ning F CTE Teacher N Doctoral Participant 25 CMS F Y Student
    • Theme Emergence Response Number Ning’s ease of use 2 Similarity of Ning to other discussion boards 2 Need to collaborate with other students 3 Value knowing more about other students in class 4 Recognize a need for professional social networking 5 Importance of teacher facilitation/interaction on discussion 4 Enjoy discussions online 3 Privacy concerns with SNS 3 Interest in creating their own Ning 3
    • “I like the ability to be apart of a group where you have to be invited to be. So you have members that are actually part of your group, so not everybody can join like on Facebook. So the privacy it brings. And of course I like all the social networking aspects that allow me to share pictures and music, videos, personal information, post to your wall, all those typical social networking things.” Participant 22
    • Research Findings
    • Based on the previous research of peer-to-peer interactions on discussion boards (Grisham & Wolsey, 2006; Rourke & Anderson, 2002) it was expected that by utilizing a tool that encouraged student control and interaction there would be a significant increase in the depth and breadth of student discussions.
    • Discussion Board • Discussion questions may not have been formulated for the debate IAM looks for • May have internalized knowledge construction (Kanuka & Anderson, 2005) • Heavy peer-to-peer interaction • Pre-conceptions of board usage
    • Ning Use • Students enjoyed using the tool • Several plan on using it in their classrooms • Tool aquisition • Paradigm shift
    • Limitations • Number of participants • Convenience Sample • Only generalizable to other graduate classes in Instructional Technology
    • Future Research • Larger Scale • Non-technical class • Undergraduates • Focus on profile creation tools • Longitudinal study • Facebook
    • Implications for Practice • Overview of tool • Setting expectations