Rating Higher Education Websites: The Student Experience

Loading...

Flash Player 9 (or above) is needed to view presentations.
We have detected that you do not have it on your computer. To install it, go here.

0 comments

Post a comment

    Post a comment
    Embed Video
    Edit your comment Cancel

    3 Favorites & 1 Event

    Rating Higher Education Websites: The Student Experience - Presentation Transcript

    1. Rating Higher Education Websites: The Student Experience ©Robert E. Johnson, Ph.D. 2009 ACT Enrollment Planners Conference July 16, 2009 Chicago, Illinois Bob Johnson Consulting, LLC 1
    2. Customer Centric Index (CCI) survey… Asks website visitors to select from 13 website attributes to identify top 3 positive or negative experiences CCI = % of positive votes cast 4 audiences to survey: – Current students – Possible future students – Faculty and staff – Alumni Bob Johnson Consulting, LLC 2
    3. 13 survey topics in 3 groups… Information Architecture Content Social Bob Johnson Consulting, LLC 3
    4. INFORMATION ARCHITECTURE FACTORS Factor Positive Negative Helpful search Search results Poor search results Clear menus and Confusing menus Navigation links and links Simple layout / Cluttered layout / Layout easy to read hard to read Looks attractive / Looks unattractive / Visual appeal appealing unappealing Speed Fast to do things Slow to do things Bob Johnson Consulting, LLC 4
    5. CONTENT FACTORS Factor Positive Negative Up-to-date Up-to-date Out-of-date information information Accurate Inaccurate Accurate information information Complete Incomplete Complete information information Full of jargon, Language Plain language corporate speak Bob Johnson Consulting, LLC 5
    6. SOCIAL FACTORS Factor Positive Negative Easy to contact a Hard to contact a Contact person person Easy to participate Hard to participate Participation / give feedback / give feedback Gives me the facts Misleading / not Open / transparent transparent Has ratings, Has no ratings, Recommendations reviews, reviews, recommendations recommendations Bob Johnson Consulting, LLC 6
    7. •Please choose the THREE factors from the list below that best describe your actual experience with the Enormous State University website. •Give a score of 3 to the factor which best describes your experience, 2 to the next best description, and then 1. •Please give only one score of 3, 2 and 1. •Leave the rest blank. Bob Johnson Consulting, LLC 7 Copyright © Customer Carewords Ltd.
    8. Bob Johnson Consulting, LLC 8 Copyright © Customer Carewords Ltd.
    9. CCI at 10 schools… 7 in presentation 3 not in presentation – DePaul University – University of – East Stroudsburg Hertfordshire (UK) University – University of Manitoba – Fordham University – University of Oslo – Lund University On next CCI ratings (Sweden) page only – Tyler Junior College – University of Missouri – University of Waterloo Bob Johnson Consulting, LLC 9
    10. 8 CCI ratings to date… 76% %External voters… 91.6% 74% 79.6% 70% 86.1% 67% 89.3% 62% 51.0% 61% 27.7% 52% 4.8% 45% 10.2% Bob Johnson Consulting, LLC 10
    11. Overall results… External users were happier than internal users – Future students were happier than current students – Alumni were close to future students High concern with deficiencies in: – Navigation – Search Bob Johnson Consulting, LLC 11
    12. Total Results from 4 Audiences Current students Future students Faculty & Staff Alumni Bob Johnson Consulting, LLC 12
    13. Voters by audience category… Future students… 3,326 Alumni… 1,397 Current students… 905 Faculty & staff… 480 Total voters… 6,108 Total votes cast… 18,338 Bob Johnson Consulting, LLC 13
    14. Areas of interest by votes received… IA… 9,843 votes = 53.6% of total – Visual Appeal (2,184) High: 87% Low: 67% – Layout (2,343) High: 85% Low: 61% – Speed (1,141) High: 84% Low: 49% – Navigation (2,578) High: 62% Low: 35% – ►Search (1,597) High: 55% Low: 24% Bob Johnson Consulting, LLC 14
    15. Areas of interest by votes received… Content… 5,116 votes = 27.8% of total – Language (843) High: 100%Low: 79% – Accurate (1,339) High: 93% Low: 63% – Up-to-date (1,551) High: 86% Low: 41% – Complete (1,383) High: 82% Low: 40% Bob Johnson Consulting, LLC 15
    16. Areas of interest by votes received… Social…. 3,379 votes = 18.4% of total – Open (1,231) High: 90% Low: 67% – Contact (1,170) High: 72% Low: 42% – Participation (632) High: 73% Low: 44% – Recommendations (346) High: 76% Low: 0% Bob Johnson Consulting, LLC 16
    17. Audience specific results… Future Students Bob Johnson Consulting, LLC 17
    18. Areas of interest by votes received… IA… 4,990 votes = 51.9% of total – Visual Appeal (1,059) High: 93% Low: 4% – Layout (1,194) High: 96% Low: 26% – Speed (714) High: 87% Low: 41% – Navigation (1,332) High: 83% Low: 24% – Search (701) High: 92% Low: 50% Bob Johnson Consulting, LLC 18
    19. Areas of interest by votes received… Content… 2,763 votes = 28.7% of total – Language (424) High: 100%Low: 79% – Accurate (810) High: 93% Low: 63% – Up-to-date (677) High: 86% Low: 41% – Complete (852) High: 82% Low: 40% Bob Johnson Consulting, LLC 19
    20. Areas of interest by votes received… Social…. 1,856 votes = 19.3% of total – Open (739) High: 100%Low: 76% – Contact (575) High: 100% Low:32% – Participation (314) High: 100% Low:59% – Recommendations (228)High: 100%Low:61% Bob Johnson Consulting, LLC 20
    21. Audience specific results… Current Students Bob Johnson Consulting, LLC 21
    22. Areas of interest by votes received… IA… 2,484 votes = 68.6% of total – Visual Appeal (281) High: 88% Low: 59% – Layout (303) High: 88% Low: 61% – Speed (193) High: 74% Low: 48% – Navigation (436) High: 62% Low: 24% – Search (366) High: 38% Low: 20% Bob Johnson Consulting, LLC 22
    23. Areas of interest by votes received… Content… 661 votes = 18.2% of total – Language (88) High: 100%Low: 77% – Accurate (157) High: 88% Low: 74% – Complete (180) High: 74% Low: 39% – Up-to-date (236) High: 65% Low: 38% Bob Johnson Consulting, LLC 23
    24. Areas of interest by votes received… Social…. 475 votes = 13.1% of total – Open (141) High: 90% Low: 57% – Contact (218) High: 78% Low: 52% – Participation (80) High: 82% Low: 15% – Recommendations (36) High: 57% Low: 0% Bob Johnson Consulting, LLC 24
    25. Key comparison areas… Current students vs. Future students Bob Johnson Consulting, LLC 25
    26. Top 5 factors by votes cast… Current students Future students – Navigation – Navigation – Search – Layout – Layout – Visual – Visual – Complete – Up-to-date – Accurate Bob Johnson Consulting, LLC 26
    27. Highest difference between positive and negative votes… Current students Future – Participation – Visual – Recommendations – Layout – Navigation – Contact – Complete – Navigation – Recommendations Bob Johnson Consulting, LLC 27
    28. Least difference between positive and negative votes… Current students Future students – Accurate (positive) – Language – Search (negative) (positive) – Language – Accurate (positive) (positive) – Open (positive) Bob Johnson Consulting, LLC 28
    29. What does it mean? Difficult for one website to meet internal and external users needs Argues for Internet and Intranet websites – Intranet users need “nuts and bolts” website that focuses on frequent task completion Special attention to navigation & search… – Help people find things quickly Less focus on “beauty” & “cool” Increased audience research Bob Johnson Consulting, LLC 29
    30. Thank You! Bob Johnson, Ph.D. President and Senior Consultant Bob Johnson Consulting, LLC 248.766.6425 bob@bobjohnsonconsulting.com http://twitter.com/HighEdMarketing Customer Carewords Research for Online Marketing Success: http://www.bobjohnsonconsulting.com/customercarewords.html Bob Johnson Consulting, LLC 30
    31. Example of CCI Report Pages Bob Johnson Consulting, LLC 31
    32. Voting spread… Negative votes Positive votes 25% 20% 15% 10% 5% 0% 5% 10% Up-to-date Accurate Complete Plain language Contact Participation Open Recommendations Search Navigation Layout Visual appeal Speed Bob Johnson Consulting, LLC 32
    33. Where to invest resources… Content 28% Information Social Architecture 4% 68% Bob Johnson Consulting, LLC 33
    34. Action priorities… Search Navigation Up-to-date Layout Speed Accurate Complete Participation Plain language Visual appeal Recommendations Open Contact 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40% Bob Johnson Consulting, LLC 34
    SlideShare Zeitgeist 2009

    + Bob JohnsonBob Johnson Nominate

    custom

    948 views, 3 favs, 0 embeds more stats

    How do current students and potential future studen more

    More info about this document

    © All Rights Reserved

    Go to text version

    • Total Views 948
      • 948 on SlideShare
      • 0 from embeds
    • Comments 0
    • Favorites 3
    • Downloads 50
    Most viewed embeds

    more

    All embeds

    less

    Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
    Flag as inappropriate

    Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate. If needed, use the feedback form to let us know more details.

    Cancel
    File a copyright complaint
    Having problems? Go to our helpdesk?

    Categories

    Groups / Events