Your SlideShare is downloading. ×
Plagiarism in Armenian Universities
Plagiarism in Armenian Universities
Plagiarism in Armenian Universities
Plagiarism in Armenian Universities
Plagiarism in Armenian Universities
Plagiarism in Armenian Universities
Plagiarism in Armenian Universities
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5
×

Thanks for flagging this SlideShare!

Oops! An error has occurred.

×
Saving this for later? Get the SlideShare app to save on your phone or tablet. Read anywhere, anytime – even offline.
Text the download link to your phone
Standard text messaging rates apply

Plagiarism in Armenian Universities

360

Published on

Published in: Education
0 Comments
0 Likes
Statistics
Notes
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

No Downloads
Views
Total Views
360
On Slideshare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
1
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
1
Comments
0
Likes
0
Embeds 0
No embeds

Report content
Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
No notes for slide

Transcript

  • 1. PLAGIARISM AT THE UNIVERSITIES OF ARMENIA. UNRAVELING THE TANGLE Yerevan, 22 September 2011 “Crossroads Debate Club” NGO
  • 2. CONTRIBUTING FACTOR 1. UNAWARENESS • There is no institutionalized approach/policy toward plagiarism on the part of Universities or the RA Ministry of Education and Science. • Universities do not have formal procedures for sanctioning plagiarism. • As a rule, universities and professors view instances of plagiarism as a form of minor offence.
  • 3. • Universities do not have courses of academic writing. • There are no alternative forms of transferring information about plagiarism to students. At best, students learn about plagiarism from their supervisors, friends, Internet, etc. • There remain persisting misperceptions about plagiarism and principles of academic ethics among students and even professors.
  • 4. FACTOR 2. TRADITIONS DISCOURAGING INDEPENDENT WRITING • Low expectations from papers (referat) and course/diploma theses which are viewed as a form of simple reproduction of existing knowledge. • “Top-down approach” in selection of themes for course/diploma/master’s theses; lack of interest in proposed (imposed) themes; repetition of themes from one year to another.
  • 5. • Prevalence of too broad and descriptive (as opposed to argumentative) themes of papers, course/diploma/master’s theses. • Ineffective supervision by professors. • Roots of university plagiarism going back to the secondary school (school referats/papers).
  • 6. MEASURES FOR UNRAVELING THE TANGLE 1. Taking measures toward producing internal and external incentives • Organize introductory lectures for first-year students on plagiarism and referencing. • Publish and distribute teaching materials with information about plagiarism. • Organize PR initiatives toward raising awareness about plagiarism. • Prepare specialists of academic writing; introduce courses of academic writing at universities (long-term approach!). • Adopt internal regulations for sanctioning plagiarism.
  • 7. • Create electronic database of papers, course/diploma/master’s theses written in the Armenian language. • Popularize successful work (student conferences and publications). 2. Making the written assignments student-oriented • Make papers, course/diploma/master’s theses argumentative and specific. • Adopt bottom-up versus top-down approach in designating the themes. • Make supervision and feedback of students’ written work more efficient. • Pay attention to the situation in the Secondary school.

×