• Share
  • Email
  • Embed
  • Like
  • Save
  • Private Content
Safety Management Systems in Business & Corporate Aviation

Safety Management Systems in Business & Corporate Aviation



The final presentation for the Safety Management Systems in Aviation module in Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University

The final presentation for the Safety Management Systems in Aviation module in Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University



Total Views
Views on SlideShare
Embed Views



2 Embeds 10

http://www.linkedin.com 9
https://www.linkedin.com 1



Upload Details

Uploaded via as Microsoft PowerPoint

Usage Rights

© All Rights Reserved

Report content

Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

  • Full Name Full Name Comment goes here.
    Are you sure you want to
    Your message goes here
Post Comment
Edit your comment

    Safety Management Systems in Business & Corporate Aviation Safety Management Systems in Business & Corporate Aviation Presentation Transcript

    • Safety Management Systemsin Business & Corporate Aviation
      by Can Bayrak
    • Introduction
      SMS Concept
      Regulators and Associations
      Corporate Aviation versus Airlines
      Exemplary Corporation
    • Business and Corporate Aviation;
      • On-Demand
      • Private Aircraft
      • Flexibility in Destination and Schedule
      • Security and Safety Advantage
      • Airport Congestion Advantage
      • Comfort and Privacy
      • Company Prestige
      • Business Efficiency
      • Employee Transportation
      • Aircraft Meetings
    • Business travel has the best safety records in aviation.
      Corporate aviation is the safest among business related flight options.
      Dedicated professional pilots and mechanics, good management, equipment quality, setting and sticking to standards, and departmental culture of conservatism.
      Safety attitude should be established at the highest level and projected downward through the ranks.
      A strong and sound safety culture should be the main goal.
    • A formulized and documented approach to risk management.
      A ‘proactive’ management of safety risks.
      Main goal is to reduce the risk as low as reasonably achievable.
      Four pillars should always be included regardless of how complex the organizational structure is.
      • Written policies, procedures and guidelines
      • Data collection and analysis
      • Risk management
      • Establishing a safe culture
      SMS should be treated like any other business matter and managers should balance every element well. There would not be an effective SMS without enough resource to support it.
      SMS Concept
    • International Business Aviation Council (IBAC)
      Provider of International Standards for Business Aircraft Operators (IS-BAO).
      “Developed by the business aviation community for the benefit of business aviation community” (Rohr, 2004).
      Canadian Business Aviation Association (CBAA)
      Mandates its member companies to develop an SMS in organizational structure.
      National Business Aviation Association (NBAA)
      Encourages its member companies to develop an SMS by providing IS-BAO.
      Regulators and Associations
    • Organization Size
      • Fleet Size
      • Number of Employees
      Operational Flexibility
      • Smaller Airports
      • Shorter Runways
      • Operation Frequency
      • On-Demand
      Equipment Technology
      • Avionics
      • Parachute Systems
      • Reporting Systems
      • NextGen
      The Federal Aviation Administration and NetJets agreement on equipping NextGen in G550s and G600s (Swickard, 2009)
      Airport Congestion
      Financial Background
    • Four Pillars are still in use.
      Differences include:
      • Fleet Size
      • Fleet Type
      • Operational Strategy
      • Organizational Structure
      • Expenses
      SMS should mature in the organization to become beneficial.
      It would take longer time to mature in business operators due to the lower frequency of operations (Esler, 2009).
      Corporate Aviation versus Airlines
    • Business aviation evolves faster than scheduled aviation.
      • Technologically
      • Aircraft Safety
      • Fuel and Range Efficiency
      • Frequent Fleet Type Change
      • Cheaper Aircraft
      • Operation Variety
      • Change Management Plan
      Flows from the SMS and is used to proactively identify and manage the safety risks that can accompany significant change (Rohr, 2004).
      Corporate Aviation versus Airlines
    • Harley Davidson Motor Cycles Company
      2 Hawker 800 XP in Milwaukee Mitchell Airport
      6 Pilots, 2 Mechanics, and a Corporate Aircraft Travel Coordinator
      SMS developed in 2004
      IS-BAO registered
      ISO 9001 : 2000 Certificated
      Change Management Process implemented
      Monthly Risk Awareness Sessions, Quarterly Management Review Meetings, Periodic Executive Reporting (Monthly and Annually)
      Requiring Performance Effectiveness Planning reports from every employee annually
      Monetarily Rewards based on the employee’s participation (Jeanmarie, 2008)
      Exemplary Corporation
    • Frequent changes in fleet size and type would increase the quality and efficiency in equipment (aircraft, avionics, data monitoring systems) and experience.
      Due to the frequency of operations, data collection would be less than scheduled airlines; therefore, dense communication and data exchange between operators is a must.
      The advantage of smaller organization should be used to build up a strong safety culture.
      Frequent changes in business matters lead to frequent updates that would result to newer and more efficient SMS.
    • A more diverse community is addressed; therefore, measures, assessments, and controls should be diverse as well.
      Flexibility in destinations might result in difficulties in operations (extreme weather, regulations, costs etc.); therefore, the operator should develop an SMS relevant to the operational strategy.
      Business operators provide aircrafts in short notice, which might result in pilot fatigue, lack of crew preparedness , flight dispatching, or maintenance.
      Safety is the main goal but profit and SMS resourcing should be balanced well. SMS would fail without enough resources.
    • Canadian Business Aviation Association. (2010). About CBAA. Retrieved April/13, 2010, from http://www.cbaa-acaa.ca/about-cbaa
      Esler, D. (2009, April 1). Safety management systems for business aviation. Business & Commercial Aviation, 38.
      Federal Aviation Administration. (06/22/06). Introduction to safety management systems for air operators (Advisory Circular No. 120-92). Author.
      IBAC. (2008). IBAC. Retrieved April/13, 2010, from http://www.ibac.org/introductiontoibac.php
      Jeanmarie, M. (2008). Corporate flight operations SMS implementation overview. Presented at the meeting of Corporate Aviation Safety Seminar, Palm Harbor, FL.
      National Business Aviation Association (NBAA). (2008). Safety statistics. Retrieved April/13, 2010, from http://www.nbaa.org/ops/safety/stats/
      NBAA. (2010). About NBAA. Retrieved April/13, 2010, from http://www.nbaa.org/about/
      National Transportation Safety Board. (2010). Aviation accident statistics. Retrieved April/13, 2010, from http://ntsb.gov/aviation/Stats.htm
      Rohr, R. (2004, September). Safety management systems for business aviation. BART International, 92, 17-18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23.
      Rohr, R. (2004). Safety management systems for corporate aviation, Presented at the meeting of Corporate Aviation Safety Seminar, Tuscon, AZ.
      Swickard, J. E. (2009, January 1). NetJets, FAA Sign NextGenAgreeement. Business & Commercial Aviation, 11.