Semantic Interoperability problem of OSS Forges

Loading...

Flash Player 9 (or above) is needed to view presentations.
We have detected that you do not have it on your computer. To install it, go here.

0 comments

Post a comment

    Post a comment
    Embed Video
    Edit your comment Cancel

    Favorites, Groups & Events

    Semantic Interoperability problem of OSS Forges - Presentation Transcript

    1. Bartosz Lewandowski , Alicja Ciemniewska, Paweł Kędziora, Cezary Mazurek Poznan Supercomputing and Networking Center (PSNC), Poland Semantic Interoperability problem of OSS Forges.
    2. Outline
      • Motivation
      • Objectives
      • Problem Area
      • Approach
      • Outcomes
      • Conclusions & outlook
    3. Motivation
      • Fostering the idea for supporting interoperability in OSS field.
      • Limited interoperability of forges.
      • Forge lock-in phenomenon.
      • Lack of cross-forge migration facilities.
      • Focusing on semantic interoperability challenge: differences in Forge information models.
      • investigate and demonstrate how semantic interoperability approaches and technologies can be used to deal with the variety of software , services and actors in the OSS domain .
      • enable the process of migrating OSS project metadata between forge platforms at the semantic level by
      • introducing semantic enhancements to forge platforms
      • exploiting semantic technologies to facilitate the transition of OSS project metadata between forges.
      Objectives
    4. Problem area
      • More than 50 public and active forge instances in Europe
      • certain degree of interoperability desirable (e.g. cross-forge search or cross-forge migration)
      • Technical but also a semantic interoperability challenge
        • Differences in schemas and granularity of e . g. software categorizations, different skill terminologies, languages etc.
    5. Problem area
    6. The approach
    7. The approach Importing phase Mapping phase Exporting phase
    8. Approach. Sample migration. OSS project metadata migration from BerliOS to Gforge.
    9. Outcomes
      • The use of semantic technologies for loose coupling of heterogenous forge information models.
      • The proof-of-concept implementation based on scenario between existing forges: BerliOS and Gforge.
      • Scenario-based PoC identifies potential enhancements of Forges.
      • QualiPSo, Semantic Interoperability deliverables and the other results available at: http://www.qualipso.org/node/35
    10. Issues & limitations
      • Forge related:
      • Missing ontologies provided by forge platforms,
      • Lack of WSDL interfaces of forges.
      • Semantic technology related:
      • OWL-DL compliance of ontologies required by reasoning engines (Pellet),
      • Limitations on complexity of parameters of Semantic Web Services (OWL-S Mindswap API),
      • No significant progress in improvement/development of OWL-S APIs
    11. Conclusions & outlook
      • Modeling the project information hosted by forges:
      • Introduction of OWL-based ontologies provides a standard way for modeling project-related information.
      • Efficient modeling through concept-related features: e.g., polymorphism and inheritance.
      • Introduces the inference capabilities on OWL concepts.
      • The use of semantic mapping techniques for harmonization of heterogeneous information models . (rule-based language) ( working on a higher level of abstraction )
    12. Conclusions & outlook
      • Increasing forge interoperability:
      • Highlighting a need for using concepts of SOA and SCA in forge architectures.
      • Exposing forge functionality through WSDL interfaces
      • The introduction of OWL-S enhancements as another layer of abstraction on top of SOAP interfaces.
      • Possibility to introduce the composition of Semantic Web Services as a top layer for managing the migration process.
    13. Outlook & update
      • Inclination towards open interfaces:
      • GForge SOAP API (commercial),
      • Facebook SOAP API,
      • Google: data liberation trend.
      • Social networks vs. Collaborative Environments:
        • free your data vs. free your OSS project artefacts.
    14. Thank you! [email_address]

    + bartekelbartekel, 2 months ago

    custom

    272 views, 0 favs, 0 embeds more stats

    The presentation was given at the ICSEA 2009 and re more

    More info about this document

    CC Attribution-ShareAlike LicenseCC Attribution-ShareAlike License

    Go to text version

    • Total Views 272
      • 272 on SlideShare
      • 0 from embeds
    • Comments 0
    • Favorites 0
    • Downloads 0
    Most viewed embeds

    more

    All embeds

    less

    Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
    Flag as inappropriate

    Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate. If needed, use the feedback form to let us know more details.

    Cancel
    File a copyright complaint
    Having problems? Go to our helpdesk?

    Categories