I’m passionate about how we make learning relevant. It starts by seeing the learners as relevant. How do we connect? When we learn something, we want to share it with others.
Learning is a social act. It is a connecting act. We need to connect ideas to ideas, people to ideas, and people to people, bridging the gap between in-school and out-of-school. Ideas here are gleaned from the research synthesis report by the Connected Learning Research Network (http://dmlhub.net/sites/default/files/ConnectedLearning_report.pdf).
14. relationships
• knowing is about being known
• it is about belonging
By Jordan Thevenow-Harrison (Flickr: DSC00134) [CC-BY-SA-2.0 (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/2.0)], via Wikimedia Commons
15. • “…tightly organized and managed
activities leave little room for
problem-finding and creativity”
(Getzels & Csikszentmihalyi, 1976).
https://flic.kr/p/5anoq
19. CL experiences
a shared purpose
• authentic projects with collective goals
20. openly networked
• multi-disciplinary
• different start-end
• open access
By Conspiritech (Own work) [Public domain], via Wikimedia Commons
CL experiences
21. Design Principles for Connected Learning
• everyone can participate
• learning happens by doing
• challenge is constant
• everything is interconnected
Ideal Knot final rendering
25. “If education is
supposed to cater to
kids, it is the
responsibility of
educators to adapt to
the new generation,
whether it be culturally
or technologically.”
Parth N
By MOs810 (Own work) [GFDL (http://www.gnu.org/copyleft/fdl.html) or CC-BY-SA-4.0-3.0-2.5-2.0-1.0
(http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0-3.0-2.5-2.0-1.0)], via Wikimedia Commons
26. connected educator is willing to
• be digitally literate
• seek out and connect w/ other educators
• explore & share ideas
• develop & maintain PLN
• peruse, engage, & share pertinent ed. blogs
• be a lifelong learner in pursuit of relevance
http://tomwhitby.wordpress.com/2013/10/03/the-connected-educator-culture/
http://blogs.kqed.org/mindshift/wp-content/blogs.dir/42/files/2013/10/educators-e1382721798938.jpg
27. What are the possibilities for us?
https://www.facebook.com/media/set/?set=a.174604829265198.48101.138326246226390&type=3
@barry_dyck
blogs.hsd.ca/barrydyck
28. Notes
• For more on connected learning see
http://connectedlearning.tv/what-is-connected-
learning
Editor's Notes
Think of a student who said, “Why do we have to do this?” “When am I ever going to need this?
I was that “why” student from Kindergarten through university. I wanted to make sense of things. I wanted to know how they connected. I remember when I was leader of our youth group at church in high school, late ’70s and parents were concerned about the “bad” music we were listening to. I researched and prepared a presentation on music and called a meeting with the parents. I don’t remember what I said, but after the meeting, I distinctly remember discussing the parents’ music (CCR, The Stones) with them. We connected. There was a transparency. They could now empathize with the cultural shift. We found common ground.
In my 26 years of teaching, I’ve been drawn to the students who asked why. They have driven me to reflect on and to improve my practice. Placing the students at the center of learning changed by role as a teacher, most profoundly in the last four years evolving the Learning Project, a flexible learning environment for elective courses for students in grades 9-12 at Landmark Collegiate.
Much of what I’m going to share has come from my experiences, reading dialoging, reflecting. My learning is ongoing,
I’m passionate about how we make learning relevant. It starts by seeing the learners as relevant.
What’s so different now?
I invite comments.
The work that I’m using to frame this presentation is from the Connected Learning Research Network. Connected learning is realized when a young person is able to pursue a personal interest or passion with the support of friends and caring adults, and is able to link this learning and interest to academic achievement, career success or civic engagement.
Example of Casey Peters.
We have developed from a predominantly transmission idea of knowledge, that knowledge is something you know about, an “is” thing that you can transfer from teacher to student. Our current curriculum is built on a constructivist idea, the idea that the reader of a text or idea actively constructs and makes their own meaning from their background knowledge and experiences. In this digital, connected world, George Siemens who created a connectivist idea of learning to suggest that what we “know” exists both in us and in our connected networks: people and machines. In addition to knowing what and how, we need to “know where” and “know who.”
We all want knowledge in context and we all want to learn if we are going to do something with that knowledge.
How do we connect? When we learn something, we want to share it with others.
Learning is a social act. It is a connecting act.
We are working with the tree metaphor where our job is to produce seedlings.
A connected model of learning is about growing an ecosystem with a broad variety of life forms, interdependent.
There is no clear beginning and end. Connections head in all directions. It can be very overwhelming.
Complex problems require complex solutions. And as humans, we naturally avoid uncertainty. Who needs the stress? We are at historical crossroads and we don’t know exactly where to go. Or why we should.
The understanding that we want to catch always seems to escape our grasp. You’ve got to admire Coyote’s passion though. But passion isn’t enough.
Don’t want you to get the idea that this is all open, chaotic, unstructured. It’s not.
knowledge is wide (crowdsourcing)
boundary-free (citizen-experts)
populist (flattening of levels)
“other” credentialed (slash.dot)
unsettled
I like Keith Hamon’s analogy of the open spaces on a soccer pitch, where the best players will go and make something happen. Wayne Gretzky was like that as well.
When I started the flexible learning environment at LC, I’ve never forget the response of a grade 12 girl when asked, “What do YOU want to learn?” replied, “No one has ever asked me that before.”
Three things make up connected learning experiences.
DIY, Maker Movement, Minecraft EDU.
Think transparent. There is no edge, no shape, no foundation. The tree metaphor is replaced with not another metaphor, but rather, a lens rhizome.
We are connecting ideas to ideas (hashtags), people to ideas, and people to people.
We know enough about facts to know that there is much disagreement. We can become more sure in our limited facts or learn to better understand how ideas connect, interrelate…
Traditional education is driven by supply. We have the knowledge to give. We have lots of it. We know it’s not possible to deliver all the curriculum, but we fear students will be missing out if we don’t cover as much as possible.
In connected learning, the interest demands of the students are addressed and given more prominence.
This is frightening because it’s quite possible won’t know the answers their questions. It places us in a position of ignorance. And no one wants to be the person who doesn’t know. But that’s the new reality. The more you know, the more you know how little you know.
How can we make the connections and draw on students’ competencies? A focus of student competence rather than on deficit is the foundation for building a network of knowledge.
“CL celebrates the marriage of in-school and out-of-school learning by bridging the gap between elements learned in the classroom to the student's social and cultural experiences.”
I asked some students whom I worked with last year what they learned from being in a self-directed learning environment. I remember three comments:
failing isn't failing here
you have to push yourself and stay motivated
I learned about learning how to learn and I learned about me.
George Siemens says, “To be adaptive is to be perpetually current.”