Is Pervasive Healthcare Old Wine on a New Bottle?

Loading...

Flash Player 9 (or above) is needed to view presentations.
We have detected that you do not have it on your computer. To install it, go here.

0 comments

Post a comment

    Post a comment
    Embed Video
    Edit your comment Cancel

    3 Favorites, 1 Group & 1 Event

    Is Pervasive Healthcare Old Wine on a New Bottle? - Presentation Transcript

    1. Is 'Pervasive Healthcare' old wine on a new bottle – or is it a real, but emerging, research discipline? Jakob E. Bardram
    2. The Age Tsunami US Demand/Supply of Nurses
    3. Source : Eric Dishman. Inventing wellness systems for aging in place, IEEE Computer 37:5 (May 2004), 34–41..
    4. Changing the Centralized Model of Healthcare
      • Acute -> Continuous
      • Hospitalization -> Home & out-patient
      • Reactive -> Pro-active & Preventive
      • IT -> Assistive Technology
      • Centralized -> Pervasive
      • Sampling -> Monitoring
      • Doctor-centric -> Patient-centric
    5. Pervasive Healthcare
      • Application of pervasive computing, ubiquitous computing, proactive computing, ambient intelligence technologies for healthcare, health, and wellness management.
      • Second, it is about making healthcare pervasively available everywhere, anytime, and to anyone.
      • In essence, pervasive healthcare addresses a set of related technologies and concepts that help integrate healthcare more seamlessly to our everyday lives, regardless of space and time.
      Source: Korhonen, Ilkka, and Bardram, Jakob B. Guest editorial introduction to the special section on pervasive healthcare, IEEE Transactions on Information Technology in Biomedicine 8:3, 2004, 229–234.
    6. Agenda
      • Historical Roots
        • Biomedical Engineering, Medical Informatics, UbiComp
      • Characteristics of Pervasive Healthcare
      • Research Themes
      • Examples
        • Home based monitoring of vital signs
        • Pervasive Computing in Hospitals
      • Methods
        • Evidence-Based Medicine
        • Clinical Proof-of-Concept
      • Is the wine new?
    7. Historical Roots
    8. Biomedical Engineering – BME
      • Biomedical engineering (BME) is the application of engineering principles and techniques to the medical field.
      • BME combines the design and problem solving skills of engineering with the medical and biological science to help improve patient health care and the quality of life of healthy individuals.
      • Research Areas
        • Bioelectrical and neural engineering
        • Biomedical imaging and biomedical optics
        • Biomaterials
        • Biomechanics and biotransport
        • Biomedical devices and instrumentation
        • Molecular, cellular and tissue engineering
        • Systems and integrative engineering
    9. Biomedical Engineering
    10. Medical Informatics – MI
      • Medical informatics (MI) is the intersection of information science, computer science and health care.
      • MI deals with the resources, devices and methods required to optimize the acquisition, storage, retrieval and use of information in health and biomedicine.
      • Health informatics tools include not only computers but also
        • clinical guidelines,
        • formal medical terminologies, and
        • information and communication technology(ICT)
    11. Medical Informatics
      • Hospital Information Systems
      • Electronic Patient Record
        • Medicine Charts
        • Nursing Records
      • Clinical Decision Support Systems
      • Integration
      • Standards
        • DICOM, HL7,
      • Medical vocabularies
        • SNOMED, …
    12. Ubiquitous Computing PC Mini Mobile Internet Mainframe Ubiquitous
    13. Ubiquitous Computing
      • Embedded / invisible / ambient computing
      • From 1:1 to N:N computing
      • Mobility and Wireless connectivity
      • Collaboration
      • Sensor networks
      • Context-aware Computing
      • Capture and Access
      • From “computer” to “tool”
    14. Pervasive Healthcare – Characteristics
      • Technology
        • Sensor technology and networks
        • Embedded and mobile devices
        • Context-aware adaptation
        • Capture & Access
      • Clinical approach
        • Pro-active and preventive
        • Patient-focused
        • Monitoring rather that sampling
        • Assistive Technology rather than Information Technology
      • Research
        • Multi-disciplinary – from field studies to hardware design
        • Proof-of-Concept – rather than evidence-based medicine
    15. Pervasive Healthcare – Research Themes
      • Monitoring
      • Assistive Technologies
      • Preventive and pro-active health systems
      • Self-care & Self-treatment
      • Medication support and compliance
      • Capture and Access, Training
      • Clinical Support Systems
      • Software Architecture
      • Sensor and Network Design
      • Field Studies
      • Persuasive technologies for better health
    16. Medication I
    17. Medication II
    18. Telemedicine?
    19. Pervasive Monitoring Wireless Monitors Bodyworn Monitors Mobile Monitoring Body Sensor Network MyHeart Project
    20. Challenges in Monitoring
      • Robust measurement and processing methods requires access to large and representative real data sets
        • Real cases in real environment with real problems and artifacts
        • Reference data - real well-being - collected in parallel
        • Similar problem when collecting evidence for correct functioning and usefulness of the method - required for evidence based medicine (EBM)
      • How to reach this - especially for long term (months - years)?
        • Motivation of (many enough real) subjects to wear/use often bulky and error-prone prototypes
        • Ethics?
        • Practical and economical issues: prototype costs (many copies needed), maintenance costs (battery replacements, data transfer, calibration, etc.)
      • Result: few success stories so far…
      Source : Ilkka Korhonen
    21. Example I ElderTech – Technologies for Elders
      • Purpose
        • Self-care and independent living
        • Easy communication with clinical staff, relatives and peers
        • Continuous updated view on health status
        • Basis for pro-active clinical contingency management
        • Shared care – cooperation across clinical boundaries
      • Features
        • Monitoring – Blood Pressure and Weight (wireless)
        • Medication – administration and management
        • Communication & Coordination – “The Collaboration Book”
      • Deployment
        • 7 Homes, elders 70+
        • Nursing staff, nurses and assistants
        • ~3 months
        • Qualitative data collection
    22. Technical Setup
    23. Findings – Elders
      • Usability
        • Scale & BP monitor used frequently
        • The PC – 5 out of 7 did not use it
      • Communication
        • No changes experienced
        • But was not looking into the ‘collaboration book’
      • Clinically, Self-care, Monitoring
        • Liked the monitoring
        • Increased their feeling of security/safety
        • Was trusting the staff to monitor their health data and react if necessary
        • Documentation of medicine intake was not considered relevant
    24. Findings – Healthcare Workers
      • Administration
        • Collaboration book
        • Integration with care system
      • Communication
        • Might improve communication with GP
      • Clinically
        • Felt uncomfortable – Responsibility of the GP
        • Extra work – felt not necessary
      • Remote monitoring and prevention
        • Indications
        • Specific groups of elders – diabetics, hypertension, …
        • Concerned about remote monitoring – “not the right picture”
    25. Lessons learned about designing AT
      • Vital sign monitoring is ‘interesting’
        • but introduces a huge responsibility for actually reading them
      • Communication and sharing seems to be just as interesting
        • between nurses/GP/hospital
        • between clinicians and citizens
        • between citizens
      • If “Information Technology” is part of the solution
        • then IT has to look considerable different that it does now!
      • Experimentation is essential in the design process
        • we actually do not know what we do
        • … what will work
        • … how to design it
        • … and how users will use it
        • hence, close-loop experimentation is essential
    26. Example II The Interactive Hospital – Supporting Awareness in a Operating Ward
    27. Whiteboards in Hospitals Source : J.E. Bardram, Temporal Coordination - On Time and Coordination of Collaborative Activities at a Surgical Department. Computer Supported Cooperative Work , 9(2):157-187, 2000.
    28. Affordances of Whiteboards
      • Core Roles of Whiteboards in Hospitals
        • Visibility
        • Overview
        • Status
        • Coordination
        • Communication
        • Handling contingencies
      • Research
        • Temporal Coordination [Bardram, JCSCW 2000]
        • Cog. Props of Whiteboards [Xiao et al, ECSCW 2001]
        • Inf. & Repres. [Reddy et al., ECSCW 2001]
        • Web of Artifacts [Bardram & Bossen, GROUP 2005]
    29. Design of AwareMedia
      • ” Putting the schedule back on the wall”
        • Public and shared social awareness
        • Temporal awareness
        • Spatial awareness
        • Communication
      Source : J.E. Bardram, T.R. Hansen and M. Soegaard. AwareMedia: a shared interactive display supporting social, temporal, and spatial awareness in surgery. In Proceedings of ACM CSCW '06 , p. 109-118, ACM Press, 2006.
    30. AwareMedia User Interface
    31. AwareMedia Technology & Architecture
      • Technologies
        • Media Spaces
        • Scheduling/Booking
        • Context-awareness
        • Instant Messaging
      • Builds upon
        • AWARE architecture
          • [CSCW 2004]
        • JCAF framework
          • [Pervasive 2005]
    32. 1. Spatial Awareness
      • OR Space
        • Video
        • Status
        • People in the OR
        • Patient
        • Type of surgery & expected end time
    33. 2. Temporal Awareness
      • OR Schedule
        • Operations
        • OR Teams
        • Timing
        • Delays
        • Cancellations
    34. 3. Social Awareness
      • Context
        • Picture, Name & Initials
        • Location
        • Activity (e.g. surgery)
        • Tracking device
        • Role (e.g. replacement, coodinator, surgeon)
    35. Deployment
      • Site
        • OR Ward, Bed Ward, Recovery
        • Supports 3 ORs, 30-50 people pr. day
      • Technology
        • Coordination central -> 2 large interactive displays
        • 3 OR / Wards -> 20’’ touch screens
        • Web cams
        • Location tracking based on Bluetooth
          • Tag
          • Mobile phones
        • ~20 AwarePhones
      • Deployed during 12 months
    36. Hospital
    37. Operating Ward
    38. AwareMedia in Use
      • Data collection
        • Observations, Interviews, Data Logging
      • Lessons learned
        • Increase Awareness and Communication
          • More efficiency in OR coordination
          • Fewer interruptions
        • Redundant information
          • Location, status, operations, …
        • Simple, stable, and predictable displays
          • Easy to learn, use, and navigate in a critical environment
    39. Example III Context-aware Patient Safety in the Operating Room
    40. Patient Safety
      • Institute of Medicine: “To err is Human”
        • 9% adverse events, 40% related to ‘errors’, 60% to complications
        • Danish studies confirm this
      • Utah and Colorado
        • Operative adverse events comprised 44.9% of all adverse events
      • Joint Commission
        • Universal Protocol for Preventing Wrong Site, Wrong Procedure, Wrong Person Surgery
      • Danish Recommendation
        • Improve communication and coordination
        • Improve patient identification
      • Source :
      • Institute of Medicine
      • E J Thomas et al (2000). Incidence and types of adverse events and negligent care in Utah and Colorado. Med. Care., vol. 38, no. 3.
    41. A Context-aware Patient Safety System
      • Context-awareness
        • RFID sensor input + other input
        • Based on the Java Context-Awareness Framework (JCAF)
        • Extended with reasoning engine (JESS)
      • Features
        • Presenting relevant information during operation
          • PACS, EPR, Operation data
        • Monitors progress and fire warnings
          • Patient, Team, Blood, Patient Status, Equipment, …
      • Clinical Proof-of-Concept
        • Full functioning prototype
        • Deployed inside one OR with a full OR team
        • Used during one day (no real patients, however)
        • Qualitative evaluation
    42. So what’s different?
      • ElderTech
        • Continuous Monitoring coupled with patient-clinician reliability and trust
        • Focus on Patient communication – not telemedicine
        • Methods are not clinically oriented
      • The Interactive Hospital
        • Social and Context Awareness
        • Focus on clinical collaboration and usability – not health informatics
      • Patient Safety in the OR
        • Context awareness and reasoning
        • Focus on ‘contextual’ and ‘procedural’ safety – not biological safety
    43. Methodology
    44. Evidence-Based Medicine – EBM
      • U.S. Preventive Services Task Force & UK National Health Service
        • Level I: Evidence obtained from at least one properly designed randomized controlled trial .
        • Level II-1: Evidence obtained from well-designed controlled trials without randomization .
        • Level II-2: Evidence obtained from well-designed cohort or case-control analytic studies , preferably from more than one center or research group.
        • Level II-3: Evidence obtained from multiple time series with or without the intervention . Dramatic results in uncontrolled trials might also be regarded as this type of evidence.
        • Level III: Opinions of respected authorities, based on clinical experience, descriptive studies, or reports of expert committees.
      Source : Wikipedia U.S. Preventive Services Task Force & UK National Health Service
    45. Proof-of-Concept
      • “ The construction of working prototypes of the necessary infrastructure in sufficient quality to debug the viability of the system in daily use; ourselves and a few colleagues serving as guinea pigs”
      Source : Marc Weiser. “Some Computer Science Issues in Ubiquitous Computing”, in Communications of the ACM , 36(7), 1993, ACM.
    46. Clinical Proof-of-Concept
    47. Clinical Proof of Concept – CPoC
      • Technology
        • Working prototype
        • Usable (but not necessarily user-friendly)
        • Stand alone
        • Focused on specific research questions
      • Deployment
        • Deployment in a real clinical environment
        • Used by real users (researchers are hands-off)
        • For a short , but sufficient time of period (1 day – 3 months)
      • Collecting ‘Evidence’
        • Observations
        • Questionnaires
        • Perceived Usefulness and Usability
        • Measure – if possible
      Qualitative data Quantitative data
    48. Examples of Clinical PoC
      • AwareMedia
        • Clinical PoC in a surgical ward for 4-5 months
      • Patient Safety
        • Clinical PoC in an OR during 1 day
      • Home based monitoring
        • Clinical PoC during ~3 months in 7 homes
    49. Summing up
    50. So – is Pervasive Healthcare new Wine?
    51. Call for Action
      • Maintain focus on “pervasive” approach to healthcare
        • Supporting the move from a Mainframe to a Pervasive model of healthcare
      • Define and describe Pervasive Healthcare
        • Post it to Wikipedia
        • International Association of Pervasive Healthcare – IAPHC?
      • Define the research methods for Pervasive Healthcare
        • “ Moving out of the lab”
        • Clinical Proof-of-Concept
      • Ensure research quality
        • Do not be an isolated group of researchers
        • Make profound research which can be published in well-established venues and journals
        • Ensure affiliation with IEEE and ACM
    52. Contact details
      • Jakob E. Bardram
        • [email_address]
        • www.itu.dk/~bardram

    + bardrambardram, 2 years ago

    custom

    1705 views, 3 favs, 0 embeds more stats

    Keynote talk given at the Pervasive Health Conferen more

    More info about this document

    © All Rights Reserved

    Go to text version

    • Total Views 1705
      • 1705 on SlideShare
      • 0 from embeds
    • Comments 0
    • Favorites 3
    • Downloads 0
    Most viewed embeds

    more

    All embeds

    less

    Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
    Flag as inappropriate

    Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate. If needed, use the feedback form to let us know more details.

    Cancel
    File a copyright complaint
    Having problems? Go to our helpdesk?

    Categories