Your SlideShare is downloading. ×
0
HeLF eSubmission Quantitative Results2012
HeLF eSubmission Quantitative Results2012
HeLF eSubmission Quantitative Results2012
HeLF eSubmission Quantitative Results2012
HeLF eSubmission Quantitative Results2012
HeLF eSubmission Quantitative Results2012
HeLF eSubmission Quantitative Results2012
HeLF eSubmission Quantitative Results2012
HeLF eSubmission Quantitative Results2012
HeLF eSubmission Quantitative Results2012
HeLF eSubmission Quantitative Results2012
HeLF eSubmission Quantitative Results2012
HeLF eSubmission Quantitative Results2012
HeLF eSubmission Quantitative Results2012
HeLF eSubmission Quantitative Results2012
HeLF eSubmission Quantitative Results2012
HeLF eSubmission Quantitative Results2012
HeLF eSubmission Quantitative Results2012
HeLF eSubmission Quantitative Results2012
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5
×

Thanks for flagging this SlideShare!

Oops! An error has occurred.

×
Saving this for later? Get the SlideShare app to save on your phone or tablet. Read anywhere, anytime – even offline.
Text the download link to your phone
Standard text messaging rates apply

HeLF eSubmission Quantitative Results2012

1,106

Published on

Published in: Education
0 Comments
1 Like
Statistics
Notes
  • Be the first to comment

No Downloads
Views
Total Views
1,106
On Slideshare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
0
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
11
Comments
0
Likes
1
Embeds 0
No embeds

Report content
Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
No notes for slide

Transcript

  • 1. Dr Barbara Newland, Brighton Lindsay Martin, Edge HillAlice Bird, Liverpool John Moores
  • 2.  This presentation is a summary of the quantitative data from the Heads of eLearning Forum eSubmission survey undertaken in March 2012. Further information on the qualitative results will be made available later.
  • 3.  The term eSubmission is used very widely to cover a range of activities so the following definitions were used: eSubmission online submission of an assignment eMarking marking online ie not paper eFeedback producing online feedback which could be text, audio etc but not paper eReturn online return of marks
  • 4.  To identify current practice with regard to eSubmission, eMarking and eFeedback in UK HE To gain a snapshot of the strategic overview identifying key issues relating to assessment regulations and academic attitudes
  • 5.  A network of senior staff in institutions engaged in promoting, supporting and developing technology enhanced learning Over 125 nominated Heads from UK Higher Education institutions A regular programme of well attended events Represents the interests of its members to various national bodies and agencies including the Higher Education Academy and JISC www.helf.ac.uk
  • 6.  The survey was available to HeLF members who were asked to respond with regard to their knowledge of their own institution. The survey was available in March 2012 and took about 10 minutes to complete The questions were a mixture of closed multiple-choice and multiple selection as well as open response type Participants were assured that all data collected in the survey would be held anonymously and securely No personal data was asked for or retained unless the participant indicated a willingness to participate in the follow-up activity The results are being analyzed using quantitative and qualitative methods
  • 7.  44 responses from HeLF members 35% response rate
  • 8. 40353025 eSubmission20 eFeedback with eMarking15 eFeedback without eMarking10 5 0 Yes No Dont know
  • 9. 252015 eSubmission eFeedback with eMarking10 eFeedback without eMarking 5 0 Yes No Dont know
  • 10. 30252015 University-wide10 Some department-wide Individual academics only 5 0 eSubmission is eSubmission eSubmission eSubmission eFeedback and Hard copy is the only form and hard copy and hard copy and hard copy student can the only form of submission printed by printed by printed by choose to print of submission student department individual hard copy of academic feedback
  • 11. Within institutional assessmentregulationsSeparate regulationsNot yet been consideredDont know
  • 12. OptionalOptional and strongly encouraged bysome departmentsOptional and strongly encouraged acrossthe institutionCompulsory where adopted bydepartmentsCompulsory where adopted institution-wide
  • 13. 4035302520 eSubmission of text eFeedback of text1510 5 0 Turnitin (stand- Turnitin (integrated VLE Home grown Other alone) into VLE)
  • 14. YesNoUnder consideration
  • 15. 353025201510 5 0 Senior Head of Academics Administrators Learning Students Nobody management Faculty/School technologists
  • 16. 40353025 eSubmission20 eFeedback with eMarking15 eFeedback without eMarking10 5 0 Positive Negative Dont know
  • 17. 35302520 eSubmission eFeedback with eMarking15 eFeedback without eMarking10 5 0 Positive Negative Dont know
  • 18. 40353025 eSubmission20 eFeedback with eMarking15 eFeedback without eMarking10 5 0 Positive Negative Dont know
  • 19.  http://www.yorksj.ac.uk/technology-enhanced-learning/technology-enhanced- learning/moodle/e-submission.aspx http://www.bradford.ac.uk/elearning/e-SubmissionOptions/page_01.htm https://www.ucl.ac.uk/isd/staff/e-learning/tools/turnitin http://turnitin.wetpaint.com/ http://staffcentral.brighton.ac.uk/plagiarism/esubmission.shtm http://ltss.beds.ac.uk/breo_help/staff_help/sta_019.html http://www.lancs.ac.uk/celt/celtweb/files/LUVLEStaffGuide0910.pdf starting on p 35 http://hermes.uwl.ac.uk/vle_staff_support/index.asp?toolkitID=100&sectionID=120&topicID= First&pageNo=1 http://www.gold.ac.uk/warden/smt-pw-students/ www.derby.ac.uk/esubmission - staff site www.derby.ac.uk/esub - student site

×