Indigo competitive analysis
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5

Indigo competitive analysis



Analysis of Indigo airlines and airline industrty

Analysis of Indigo airlines and airline industrty



Total Views
Views on SlideShare
Embed Views



0 Embeds 0

No embeds



Upload Details

Uploaded via as Microsoft PowerPoint

Usage Rights

© All Rights Reserved

Report content

Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

  • Full Name Full Name Comment goes here.
    Are you sure you want to
    Your message goes here
Post Comment
Edit your comment
  • AnalysisKF is combined share of full fledged and low cost airlineHence, Indigo is the market leader in LCC segment (29 %) and over all 19% share.
  • Full fledged carrier like Jet, KF share resources between LCC and FFC ( full fledged carrier)Highest Load factor of Indigo therby maximum utilization of resourcesJetLite employee count is less but Jet Airways emloyeesappraochs 6000. Same for KF
  • Govt regulation prevents indian carrier for starting international operations before 5 years of inception. Hence indigo started late.
  • Duranto Is for long distance and shatabdi is for short distance
  • Entry of foreign carriers in domestic market is not allowed due to FDI and equity holding barriers. Foreign airlines cannot hold equity of domestic carriers.2/3 Directors should be of indian origin
  • There is only 1 airport per city in IndiaAFFPL implemented after 2006
  • There is only 1 airport per city in IndiaAFFPL implemented after 2006
  • There is only 1 airport per city in IndiaAFFPL implemented after 2006

Indigo competitive analysis Indigo competitive analysis Presentation Transcript

  •  Leading Low Cost Carrier in India Founded in 2006 First flight Delhi-Guwahati-Imphal 4th August 2006 Presently 26 destinations in India, 259 flights everyday A fleet of 43 A320 in service ( August 2011) 238 A320 on order, expected a total of 100 A320 by 2015
  • IndustryCompetition
  • Market Share In LCC segment Go Air 9% Indigo 29% Indigo SpiceJetKingfisher jetLite 30% Kingfisher Go Air SpiceJet jetLite 21% 11%
  • Jetlite Indigo Kingfisher SpiceJet Fleet Size 25 25 66 20Personnel 1542 2320 7695 2458 PassengerLoad Factor 74.9 80.0 72.7 76.6
  •  Fees and surcharges forms the major component in prices Highly Competitive Prices with very narrow variation No distinguishing service like Seat preference, meal or any other VAS which could set Indigo apart Imphal- Airlines Delhi-Mumbai Mumbai- Blore Guwahati Indigo 3185 2428 1979 SpiceJet 3184 2431 NA KF Red 3834 2880 2353 Jetlite 3034 2284 2130
  • Continuous High performance by Indigo Airlinescould be a distinguishing factorBrand building based on this factor Airline On Time Performance Indigo 84% SpiceJet 84% JetLite 54% Kingfisher 70%
  •  Competitor include home grown carrier like SpiceJet, Kingfisher and international LCC like AirAsia, Air Arabia , Fly Dubai International Operations started from 1 Sept 2011 34% route authority in domestic market not utilized indicates strong competition in domestic segment and higher profit margins in international routes Key target market include SE Asia and West Asia flying out from tier II cities like Trichy , Coimbatore, Amritsar, Khozikode Competitive advantages to international carriers due to govt policies ( entrance) and fuel supply chain
  • IndustryPotential threat Competition
  •  Full fledged carriers with low cost subsidiaries ◦ JetConnect, AllianceAir ◦ Sharing personnel, cost and other resources ◦ Better utilization of resources Govt policy to promote regional airlines to promote connectivity in the region ◦ Freedom Aviation Private Ltd to start from 2011 in South India
  • Indian Railways Subsidized fuel and electricity Current effort to increase speed to 160-200 km/h ◦ Upgrade locomotives and coaches ◦ Introduction of more non stop trains like Duranto and Shatabdi ◦ Improvement on existing conventional lines for up to 200 km/h Future effort ◦ Feasibility study of high speed train in progress ( 350Km/hr) ◦ Long term vision 2020, No concrete steps taken yet
  •  Several expressways are under construction or different stages of development ◦ Mumbai Pune Expressway ◦ Chennai- Blore Expressway ◦ Mumbai Vadodra Expressway and Ahmedabad- Vadodra Expressway Fuel prices are subsidized
  • IndustryPotential threat Competition Buyers
  •  Major crunch ofTravel Portal Web Traffic booking is coming through travelMake My Trip 28.80% portal.  2/3rd of online Yatra 23.05% ticket are booked by top 3 travel portal. Clear trip 15.75%  Bargaining power.
  • IndustryPotential threat Competition Buyers Substitutes
  • Over short distances railways and roadways are also an option for consumers Advantages • Cheaper • Take almost same time Routes Roadways Railways Indigo Time Time Time Cost Cost Cost (hrs) (hrs) (hrs)Delhi-Lucknow Rs 750 9.5 Rs 918 7.3 Rs 1450 1.25Chennai-B’lore Rs 650 6 Rs 560 5 Rs 1284 1 ONLY FLIGHT TIMES MENTIONED
  • North East India Monopoly of LCC in land locked areasInternational Sector No substitutes other than air routes
  • Supplier IndustryPotential threat Competition Buyers Substitutes
  •  Airport Infrastructure ◦ Airport Building ◦ Security(CISF) ◦ Baggage Conveyor system ◦ Common X-ray machines ◦ Aerobridges ◦ Airport Fuelling Facilities(Recently e.g. DAFFFPL) Airport Infrastructure players ◦ AAI ◦ Public Private Partnership ◦ Private Monopoly in both AAI/Private players Prices and Airport taxes regulated by AAI and Ministry of civil aviation …Continue d
  •  Air Traffic Controller ◦ Airport Authority of India Ltd. ◦ Altitude Assignment (higher the altitude better the efficiency) Aircraft Engineering Crew ◦ Inter Globe Aviation(Indigo’s parent company) ◦ British Airlines Engineering ◦ Air France Engineering ◦ Indian Airlines Engineering
  •  Air Turbine Fuel Suppliers ◦ PSUs: IOCL, BPCL, HPCL ◦ Private: Reliance, Essar, NOCL, Mangalore Refinery Largely Monopoly by PSUs Cost-plus pricing policy ◦ Import parity pricing model ◦ State Taxes plays an important role New Airports following a AFFPL model ◦ AFFPL: Airport Fuelling Facility Private Ltd. ◦ Private players are allowed to push there products ◦ Available only at Delhi, Hyderabad, Bangaluru
  • Supplier IndustryPotential threat Competition Buyers Substitutes
  •  rports-allowed-to-decide-on-ATF-suppliers
  • Questions and queries?