Your SlideShare is downloading. ×
Performance evaluation pptttttt
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5
×

Thanks for flagging this SlideShare!

Oops! An error has occurred.

×
Saving this for later? Get the SlideShare app to save on your phone or tablet. Read anywhere, anytime – even offline.
Text the download link to your phone
Standard text messaging rates apply

Performance evaluation pptttttt

223

Published on

Published in: Business, Technology
0 Comments
0 Likes
Statistics
Notes
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

No Downloads
Views
Total Views
223
On Slideshare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
0
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
2
Comments
0
Likes
0
Embeds 0
No embeds

Report content
Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
No notes for slide

Transcript

  • 1. Performance Evaluation
    By
    Ben Webb
    Chris Fadule
    Ashley Thorpe
  • 2. Worked for an independent contractor who specializes in human resources issues.
    Created an independent study of the employee performance evaluation practices at the XYZ Company.
    XYZ is a professional review organization in the health care industry.
    XYZ Company
  • 3. Involves a mix of objective and subjective scoring.
    Each evaluator fills out a form that covers 11 categories of employee performance such as
    Adaptability
    Accountability
    Communication & Decision making skills
    Attendance
    Performance appraisal
  • 4. 10 variables collected from each employee
    SCORE- Evaluation score in points
    LAG -The difference between the due date of the evaluation by the manager and the day on which the results were discussed with the employee, in days
    COMPANY YEARS-Years with the company
    POSITION YEARS-Years in the current position
    DEPT NO-Department number
    GRADE-Employee’s grade scale (1-7)
    EDUCATION
    Employee’s education level
    GRADE-Employee’s grade scale (1-7)
    EDUCATION-Employee’s education level
    YEARS EVAL-Years with the company at time of evaluation
    POSITION EVAL-Years in the current position at the time of evaluation
    TYPE-Type of evaluation (0=3 month evaluation, 1 = annual evaluation)
  • 5. Scores Vs. Education level
  • 6. Education and score-0.043929108,no relationship because so close to 0.
  • 7. Scores Vs.LAGRumor is true
  • 8. -0.14426close to 0, no relationship
  • 9. Lower scores Vs. RetirementRumor not valid
  • 10. no relationship -0.12712411
  • 11. Grades Vs. ScoreRumor is false
  • 12. 0.10513no relationship (close to 0)
  • 13. Over all only the scores Vs. LAG rumor was true.
    We would recommend that the company revise their employee evaluation process because there were no clear performance trends found.
    Conclusion

×