A Movie And A Chat

Loading...

Flash Player 9 (or above) is needed to view presentations.
We have detected that you do not have it on your computer. To install it, go here.

1 comments

Comments 1 - 1 of 1 previous next Post a comment

  • + danbri danbri 1 month ago
    Thanks for the talk, very interesting work...
Post a comment
Embed Video
Edit your comment Cancel

Notes on slide 1

http://www.flickr.com/photos/wvs/3833148925/This is a three part talk where I’ll discuss IM, Chatrooms, and Twitter.

There is MORE to tagging and comments in social media than how we think of it currently as the single browser/site/startup.

These tags and comments are regulated to anchored explicit annotation. This is the problem. Temporally, there is a gap – we cannot leverage these components like we have with photos.

Several sites (including YouTube and my own past research) tried to make deep comments prevalent.

Look for people

Look at chat.

Look at people.It’s a scanning pattern not about people’s movements in the room but rather activity that happens spatially.The bathroom break part is not observed explicitly aside from a “BRB” or an empty camera frame where we observed via participation.

Enter Twitter. (explain it quickly) With twitter, when something happens and you wanna shout, you tweet.

Many People Tweet while they watch tv, many TV shows call for people to follow the twitter stream.

(this is a fake tweet)

Not only of the tweet to the video but the rich data within the tweet.

Some techniques from may be applicable: Wei Hao Lin, Alexander Haputmann: Identifying News Videos ideological viewpoint or bias

5 Favorites

A Movie And A Chat - Presentation Transcript

  1. David A. Shamma
    Internet Experiences
    Yahoo! Research
    A movie and a chat…
    http://www.flickr.com/photos/wvs/3833148925/
  2. Internet Experiences GroupYahoo! Research
    (David) AymanShamma
    Lyndon Kennedy
    Elizabeth Churchill
  3. Traditional Video
  4. Traditional Comments and Tags
    Left in Whole, Unattached.
  5. Some tags can be added as annotations
    Post annotations don’t allow for real time commentary.
    This part is interesting.
  6. Social Conversations happen around videos
    Well – actually people join in a session and converse afterwards.
  7. What to Collect to measure engagement?
    Type of event (Zync player command or a normal chat message)
    Anonymous hash (uniquely identifies the sender and the receiver, without exposing personal account data)
    URL to the shared video
    Timestamp for the event
    The player time(with respect to the specific video) at the point the event occurred
    The number of characters and the number words typed (for chat messages)
    Emoticons used in the chat message
  8. A Short Movie
  9. Percent of actions over time.
  10. Volume of actions over time.
  11. Chat follows the video!
    CHAT
  12. Core Stats (opt-in)
    April 1, 2009 through April 7, 2009 (inclusive).
    3.25 million events (URLs, chat, volumes, pause events).
    24,258 users • 24,506 sessions
    Of these users, 35.29% (μ=2:02, σ= 2:72,σ2= 7:40) of the users engaged in more than one session during that week
    76,762 URLs, 23% shared in more than one session.
    Over 99% of the shared videos came from YouTube.
    Approximately 2% of all the URLs sent within Yahoo! Messenger at-large.
  13. Reciprocity
    43.6% of the sessions the invitee played at least one video back to the session’s initiator.
    77.7% sharing reciprocation
    Pairs of people often exchanged more than one set of videos in a session.
    In the categories of Nonprofit, Technology and Shows, the invitees shared more videos to the initiator (5:4, 9:7, and 5:2 respectably).
  14. Social Actions and Live Performance
    DJs manage three social networks through group of mediums like: MySpace, Webcasts, Twitter, Facebook, and IM.
  15. Y!Live
  16. Y!Live
  17. Y!Live
  18. Much of Social Media is about Congregation
    Something we think about at CHI and CSCW and should think about at WWW and MM.
    (if you are so definition inclined you can enjoy the above paste)
  19. A new form of indirect media-object annotation.
    中国没有Twitter
  20. People Tweet While They Watch
  21. @kanye dude, not cool #vma
    Tweeting while watching offers implicit event annotation…one in need of media reification.
  22. CurrentTV: Hack the Debate
  23. a Tweet
    RT: @jowyang If you are watching the debate you’re
    invited to participate in #tweetdebate Here is the 411
    http://tinyurl.com/3jdy67
  24. Anatomy of a Tweet
    Repeated (retweet) content starts with RT
    Address other users with an @
    RT: @jowyang If you are watching the debate you’re
    invited to participate in #tweetdebate Here is the 411
    http://tinyurl.com/3jdy67
    Rich Media embeds via links
    Tags start with #
  25. Indirect Annotation
    Sept 26, 2009 18:23 EST
    RT: @jowyang If you are watching the debate you’re
    invited to participate in #tweetdebate Here is the 411
    http://tinyurl.com/3jdy67
  26. Tweet Crawl
    Three hashtags: #current #debate08 #tweetdebate
    97 mins debate + 53 mins following = 2.5 hours total.
    3,238 tweets from 1,160 people.
    1,824 tweets from 647 people during the debate.
    1,414 tweets from 738 people post debate.
    577 @ mentions (reciprocity!)
    266 mentions during the debate
    311 afterwards.
    Low RT: 24 retweetsin total
    6 during
    18 afterwards.
  27. Volume of Tweets by Minute
    Crawled from the Twitter RESTful search API.
  28. Tweets During and After the Debates
    Conversation swells after the debate.
  29. Volume of Conversation Follows the Debate
    Post debate
  30. Does Conversation follow After a Segment
    Think of Isaac Newton
    Post Segment?
  31. Will the roots of f’(x) find segmentation markers?
  32. Automatic Segment Detection
    We use Newton’s Method to find extrema outside μ±σ to find candidate markers. Any marker that follows from the a marker on the previous minute is ignored.
  33. Automatic Segment Detection with 92% Accuracy
    When compared to CSPAN’s editorialized Debate Summary ± 1 minute.
  34. Tags As Boundary Objects
  35. Directed Communication via @mentions
    John Tweets: “Hey @mary, my person is winning!” Makes a directed graph from John to Mary.
  36. Barack, NewsHour, & McCain automatically discovered.
    High Eigenvector Centrality Figures on Twitter from the First US Presidential Debate of 2008.
  37. Sinks in the network
    High in degree but poor centrality.
  38. Tweets to Terms
    Common stems in bold-italic.
  39. Tweets are Reaction not Content
  40. What if we look at other events?
    What can we find?
  41. Argentina v England (1986 FIFA World Cup quarter-final)
  42. Nooo! #worldcup #hand
    Event Onset!
  43. July 20, 1969 Apollo 11 Moon Landing
  44. omg! @nasarukddng? #landing #fake #moon
    Tags as boundary objects can find communities & sets.
  45. Godzilla attacking the Tokyo
  46. やばい!国会議事堂をつぶしている!@radonがんばって!#gojira
    Tweet Content Comprehension Need Not Be Needed.
  47. Inauguration 2009
    http://www.flickr.com/photos/twistedart/3212723019/
  48. Data Mining Feed
    53,000 Tweets @ 600 per minutes
  49. Drop in @conversation as onset
  50. Drop in @conversation as onset (inaug subset)
  51. Less @ means less chars
  52. Terms as topics
    Using a TF/IDF window of 5 mins
  53. Sustained Interest
    Some topics continue over time with a higher conversational context.
  54. People Announce
    (12:05) Bastille71: OMG - Obama just messed up the oath - AWESOME! he’s human!
    (12:07) ryantherobot: LOL Obama messed up his inaugural oath twice! regardless, Obama is the president today! whoooo!
    (12:46) mattycus: RT @deelah: it wasn’t Obama that messed the oath, it was Chief Justice Roberts: http://is.gd/gAVo
    (12:53) dawngoldberg: @therichbrooks He flubbed the oath because Chief Justice screwed up the order of the words.
  55. People Reply
    (12:05) Bastille71: OMG - Obama just messed up the oath - AWESOME! he’s human!
    (12:07) ryantherobot: LOL Obama messed up his inaugural oath twice! regardless, Obama is the president today! whoooo!
    (12:46) mattycus: RT @deelah: it wasn’t Obama that messed the oath, it was Chief Justice Roberts: http://is.gd/gAVo
    (12:53) dawngoldberg: @therichbrooks He flubbed the oath because Chief Justice screwed up the order of the words.
  56. HCC and MM and Other Work
    Indirect annotation through community action
    Uncollected Sources (read: events) are highly valuable
    Segmentation, Figure Identification, Term Distance
    Bigrams? Real Time?
  57. Statler
    http://bit.ly/statler
  58. Thanks Chloe S., Ben C., Marc S., M. Cameron J., Ryan S., & NodeXL
    Tweet the Debates: Understanding Community Annotation of Uncollected Sources David A. Shamma; Lyndon Kennedy; Elizabeth F. Churchill, ACM Multimedia, ACM, 2009
    Understanding the Creative Conversation: Modeling to Engagement David A. Shamma; Dan Perkel; Kurt Luther, Creativity and Cognition, ACM, 2009
    Spinning Online: A Case Study of Internet Broadcasting by DJs David A. Shamma; Elizabeth Churchill; Nikhil Bobb; Matt Fukuda, Communities & Technology, ACM, 2009
    Zync with Me: Synchronized Sharing of Video through Instant Messaging David A. Shamma; Yiming Liu; Pablo Cesar, David Geerts, KonstantinosChorianopoulos, Social Interactive Television: Immersive Shared Experiences and Perspectives, Information Science Reference, IGI Global, 2009
    Enhancing online personal connections through the synchronized sharing of online video Shamma, D. A.; Bastéa-Forte, M.; Joubert, N.; Liu, Y., Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI), ACM, 2008
    Supporting creative acts beyond dissemination David A. Shamma; Ryan Shaw, Creativity and Cognition, ACM, 2007
    Watch what I watch: using community activity to understand content David A. Shamma; Ryan Shaw; Peter Shafton; Yiming Liu, ACM Multimedia Workshop on Multimedia Information Retrival (MIR), ACM, 2007
    Zync: the design of synchronized video sharing Yiming Liu; David A. Shamma; Peter Shafton; Jeannie Yang, Designing for User eXperiences, ACM, 2007
SlideShare Zeitgeist 2009

+ David ShammaDavid Shamma Nominate

custom

398 views, 5 favs, 0 embeds more stats

From my talk at CWI in Amsterdam: http://bit.ly/2i6 more

More info about this document

© All Rights Reserved

Go to text version

  • Total Views 398
    • 398 on SlideShare
    • 0 from embeds
  • Comments 1
  • Favorites 5
  • Downloads 0
Most viewed embeds

more

All embeds

less

Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate. If needed, use the feedback form to let us know more details.

Cancel
File a copyright complaint
Having problems? Go to our helpdesk?

Categories