Paterson Grades
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5
×
 

Paterson Grades

on

  • 10,661 views

is presentation s acopy right of Omar A.wahab.opened for read only.those who are in need for more detail may contact the author via email:

is presentation s acopy right of Omar A.wahab.opened for read only.those who are in need for more detail may contact the author via email:
awrad2000@yahoo.co.uk

Statistics

Views

Total Views
10,661
Views on SlideShare
10,658
Embed Views
3

Actions

Likes
3
Downloads
295
Comments
0

2 Embeds 3

http://www.slashdocs.com 2
http://www.linkedin.com 1

Accessibility

Categories

Upload Details

Uploaded via as Microsoft PowerPoint

Usage Rights

© All Rights Reserved

Report content

Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
  • Full Name Full Name Comment goes here.
    Are you sure you want to
    Your message goes here
    Processing…
Post Comment
Edit your comment

    Paterson Grades Paterson Grades Presentation Transcript

    • University of Medical Sciences and Technology
      Faculty of Administrative and Financial Sciences
      MBA Program, Bach3 HR
      Job EvaluationPractical case study on
      Paterson Plan
      Decision Band™ Method (DBM)
      By
      Omar Abd Al Wahab Mohd
      1
      Omer A.Wahab Mohammad MBA2009 -164
    • Job Evaluation
      What is Job Evaluation
      “Systematic process for comparing different jobs systematically to assess their relative worth (value), so providing a basis for a gradingand reward structure on fair and sound judgements”.
      • Technique for comparingand evaluating JOBS rather than employees.
      • It is about the internal Relativity of jobs.
      2
      OMER ABD AL WAHAB MOHD.........MBA2009-164
    • Job Evaluation
      Aims and objectives of Job Evaluation(1):
      • Establishes fair relative value of jobs based on fair judgement.
      • Gives more information to design equitable and sound pay and grade structure.
      • Enables sound market comparison.
      OMER ABD AL WAHAB MOHD.........MBA2009-164
      3
    • Job Evaluation
      Aims and objectives of Job Evaluation(2):
      • Provides transparency.
      • Reduces industrial disputes and legal claims.
      • build right track for career path and succession planning.
      • Boosts the emotional ties between the job and the holder.
      4
      OMER ABD AL WAHAB MOHD.........MBA2009-164
    • Job Evaluation
      Aims and objectives of Job Evaluation(3):
      • Increases retention and decreases turnover.
      • Build-up faithful and loyal calibres.
      • provides fair pay regardless to any discriminating factors.
      • Reflects positive external image that increases attraction.
      5
      OMER ABD AL WAHAB MOHD.........MBA2009-164
    • Job Evaluation
      Methods of Job Evaluation:
      • Analytical (e.g. points rating , factor comparison, Patterson ,HAY) analysing the level at which various defined factors or elements are presented in a job.
      Non-analytical (e.g. ranking, grading, paired comparison and classification) Comparing the whole jobs to place them in grades . They are not analysed by reference to their element factors.
      6
      OMER ABD AL WAHAB MOHD.........MBA2009-164
    • Facts about Job Evaluations.
      In Uk and according to e-reward survey 2003, 44% of the surveyed companies had introduced Job Evaluation.
      While 45% of those who did not have a scheme intended to introduce one.Source : Michael Armstrong (2007) A hand book of Human resources Management PP 666
      In Sudan it was introduced in the Civil Service in 1975. kenana is pioneering company in Job Evaluation. What is about others…. Any comments.
      7
      OMER ABD AL WAHAB MOHD.........MBA2009-164
      Job Evaluation
    • Job Evaluation
      Procedural steps of introducing Job Evaluation(1)
      • Top Managementapprovaland commitment.
      • Unions agreement.
      • Communication.
      • Getting the reputable consultancies Firm.
      • Selecting the Job Evaluation method.
      • Staff training.
      • Job description.
      OMER ABD AL WAHAB MOHD.........MBA2009-164
      8
    • Job Evaluation
      Procedural steps of introducing Job Evaluation(2)
      • Convene the grading committee.
      • Result acceptance from the senior Management.
      • communication.
      • Introduction & application
      • Anomalies and grievances committees
      • Updating & revising.
      9
      OMER ABD AL WAHAB MOHD.........MBA2009-164
    • Job Evaluation
      Paterson Plan
      Decision Band™ Method (DBM)
      • It is based on analytical method of Job Evaluation.
      • It was developed over 30 years ago by professor Paterson when he was in the school of Business at the University of Strathclyde in Scotland while he was studying the relationship between work and pay.
      • The method is called the Patterson Plan or the Decision Bands Method (DBM).
      10
      OMER ABD AL WAHAB MOHD.........MBA2009-164
    • Job Evaluation
      The Method Wide Spread:
      • The method was recently developed and refined by Fox Lawson’s compensation consultants.
      • The method is used world wide in both the private and the public sectors organizations e.g.. South Africa , kenana Sugar Company , State of North Carolina USA and provides good results.
      11
      OMER ABD AL WAHAB MOHD.........MBA2009-164
    • The Basic Concepts of the Method:
      • The basic premise of the method is that , the value of any job is depend on the level of its responsibility.
      • Responsibility is reflected and measured by the Decision making requirements of the job.
      • Accordingly , decision making is a logical and equitable basis on which to compare jobs within an organization.
      OMER ABD AL WAHAB MOHD.........MBA2009-164
      12
      Job Evaluation
    • OMER ABD AL WAHAB MOHD.........MBA2009-164
      Job Evaluation
      The Decision Bands :
      The Patterson Plan is based on six decision Bands:
      Band F policy Making
      Band E programming
      Band D Interpretive
      Band C Band Routine
      Band B Automatic
      Band A Defined
      13
    • TYPES OF PATTERSON BANDS
      Decision Band™ Method (DBM)
      Pyramid
      BAND F POLICY MAKING DECISION TOP MANAGEMENT
      BAND E PROGRAMMING DECISION SENIOR MANAGEMENT
      BAND D INTERPRETIVE DECISION MIDDLE MANAGEMENT
      BAND C ROUTINE DECISION SKILLED WORKERS
      BAND B AUTOMATIC DECISION SEMI SKILLED WORKERS
      BAND A DEDINED DECISION UNSKILLED WORKER
      14
      OMER ABD AL WAHAB MOHD.........MBA2009-164
      14
    • Job Evaluation
      These are decisions that determine the scope, the direction, and the overall goals of the whole organization. Band F decisions are the kind typically made by a Board, Council, or CEO.
      BAND F-Policy Making Decision
      OMER ABD AL WAHAB MOHD.........MBA2009-164
      15
    • Job Evaluation
      BAND E Programming Decisions
      • These decisions are concerned with formulating or adjusting programs for the major Functions/divisions/departments, and allocating resource among these groups.
      • The executives at Band E are typically in charge of advising line executives, heading up such major functions as marketing, administration, production, and finance in private sector organizations, and major departments in public sector organizations. They are similar to MD ,GM and Project Manager.
      OMER ABD AL WAHAB MOHD.........MBA2009-164
      16
    • Job Evaluation
      At Band D, the incumbents are required to interpret and carry out the programs or objectives developed at Band E. These decisions specify what is to be done in lower Bands, and how the resources allocated by Band E are to be deployed. Band D decisions are typically made by middle managers in various functions.
      BAND D – Interpretive decisions
      17
      OMER ABD AL WAHAB MOHD.........MBA2009-164
    • Job Evaluation
      Decisions in Band C involve determining the means or process of achieving the objectives, standards or guidelines established by Band D decisions. They are subject to the limits imposed by the available technology and resources and to the constraints set by Band D. Selecting the process is a decision that must precede carrying out the operations that make up the process. A process decision specifies what is to be done at Band B. These are typically decisions made by supervisory personnel and/or senior technical specialist positions.
      BAND C – Process Decisions
      OMER ABD AL WAHAB MOHD.........MBA2009-164
      18
    • Job Evaluation
      • These decisions focus on how to carry out the operations of the process specified by a Band C decision.
      • There is, within the limits set by the specific process, a choice as to how and when the operations are carried out, but not as to what operations constitute the process.
      19
      BAND B – Operational Decision
      OMER ABD AL WAHAB MOHD.........MBA2009-164
    • Job Evaluation
      • Band A decisions are confined to the manner and speed of performing the elements of an operation.
      • There is, within the limits set by the prescribed operation, a choice as to how the elements are performed, but not as to what elements constitute the operation.
      BAND A – Defined Decisions
      OMER ABD AL WAHAB MOHD.........MBA2009-164
      20
    • The Grades within the Bands :
      All decision bands ,except for Band A are divided into two grades ,
      • HIGHER for those jobs which co-ordinate / supervise other job or self co-ordinating.
      • LOWERfor those jobs which are not co-ordinating.
      OMER ABD AL WAHAB MOHD.........MBA2009-164
      21
      Job Evaluation
    • Job Evaluation
      The Grades within the Bands :
      22
      OMER ABD AL WAHAB MOHD.........MBA2009-164
    • The Grades within the Bands :
      OMER ABD AL WAHAB MOHD.........MBA2009-164
      23
      Job Evaluation
    • Job Evaluation
      TheSub-Grades within the Grades :
      • The eleven grades are subdivided into sub-grades.
      • There should at most be three sub-grades in each lower grade as well as in A , and two sub-grades in the higher co-ordinating grade.
      • The numbers of sub-grades in within the grade can vary according the needs of each particular organization.
      OMER ABD AL WAHAB MOHD.........MBA2009-164
      24
    • Job Evaluation
      Decision Band layout
      OMER ABD AL WAHAB MOHD.........MBA2009-164
      25
    • Job Evaluation
      Decision Band layout
      OMER ABD AL WAHAB MOHD.........MBA2009-164
      26
    • Job Evaluation
      Grading procedure guidelines
      Step one: Job Description:
      • Well trained staff start describing all the jobs.
      • Consideration will be given to reporting system, detailed information about technical task (hard factors)done and to job factors in case of stress, tolerance, activity sequence and variety .(soft factors)
      • Well done job description will lead to perfect grading.
      OMER ABD AL WAHAB MOHD.........MBA2009-164
      27
    • Job Evaluation
      Grading procedure guidelines
      Step Two: slotting jobs into Bands:
      • Jobs are to be slotted into the Bands according to the types of decisions made in the job.
      • The guiding rule is that the highest-level tasks in the job determines the Band into which the job falls.
      OMER ABD AL WAHAB MOHD.........MBA2009-164
      28
    • Job Evaluation
      Grading procedure guidelines
      Step Three : choosing the Grade within the Band:
      • Jobs are to be classified within each "Decision Band" into one of two "Grades" based on the differential supervisory difficulty and effort required of the job.
      • At this point in the process, jobs will have been classified into a hierarchy of twelve different classes of jobs, based on the job's level of responsibility and supervisory difficulty and effort.
      OMER ABD AL WAHAB MOHD.........MBA2009-164
      29
    • Job Evaluation
      Grading procedure guidelines
      Step Four: choosing the sub-grade within the grade.
      • Jobs are moved into sub-grades by considering the following soft factors:
      Stress: pressure under which the job is done.
      Tolerance :degree of accuracy
      30
      OMER ABD AL WAHAB MOHD.........MBA2009-164
    • Job Evaluation
      Grading procedure guidelines
      Step Four: choosing the sub-grade within the grade.
      3. Sequence: length of the cycle or process related to the job.
      4.Variety: number of different elements involved in the job.
      • Every job is compared with other jobs according to those factors.
      • Numeric scale can be made for each factor.
      OMER ABD AL WAHAB MOHD.........MBA2009-164
      31
    • Job Evaluation
      Grading procedure guidelines
      Step Five: Grading committee
      • the committee composed of well trained staff supported by the consultants.
      • the committee main function is to grade the job ,revise the job description and may call the department head whenever necessary to give more clarification about any job.
      • The committee raises its final grading report to the HR Manager.
      32
      OMER ABD AL WAHAB MOHD.........MBA2009-164
    • Job Evaluation
      Grading procedure guidelines
      Step Six: Result communication
      • The grading result will be communicated to the Senior Management for the purpose of approving the both side of the grading result as the job evaluation may need strong commitment to meet the additional cost in case of job cut off or salary increase, (ability to pay)
      • Union has to be fully oriented about the result.
      OMER ABD AL WAHAB MOHD.........MBA2009-164
      33
    • Job Evaluation
      Grading procedure guidelines
      Step Six: Result Implementation : HR Role.
      • Informing the employees by their new grades
      • Treating the hard issue of surplus.
      • Creating the mechanism of grievance and appeal procedures.
      • Continuous revision and updating to the system
      OMER ABD AL WAHAB MOHD.........MBA2009-164
      34
    • Job Evaluation
      Using job evaluation for setting pay:
      • Analyse jobs and rank them
      • Group jobs into grades/bands
      • Link pay to bands
      Only the first stage is ‘job evaluation’
      OMER ABD AL WAHAB MOHD.........MBA2009-164
      35
    • Job Evaluation
      Link pay to BandsJob Pricing (1)
      Union/Management committee will recommend an appropriate pay structure,
      • Jobs are placed in salary Bands only on the basis of the decision requirements of their duties.
      • Salary data should be collected by making external salary survey.
      • Bench – mark jobs and high flier jobs are to be put into consideration.
      OMER ABD AL WAHAB MOHD.........MBA2009-164
      36
    • Job Evaluation
      Link pay to BandsJob Pricing (2).
      • Determine low / high salary ratio.( vertical relativity.)
      • Determine the start of each band in consideration to the Minimum Wages Act and the Triplicate Agreement.
      • Determine the salary overlap.
      • Determine the horizontal progression ( the 5% annual increase).
      • Determine the Band other related non basic pay (allowances related to the value of the sub grades.)
      • Treat the issue of the odd salary and the anomalies.
      OMER ABD AL WAHAB MOHD.........MBA2009-164
      37
    • Job Evaluation
      Link pay to BandsJob Pricing (3).
      • Treat the issue of surplus.
      • Take care of the Management Commitment .
      • Remember the golden rule :
      ABILITY TO PAY
      OMER ABD AL WAHAB MOHD.........MBA2009-164
      38
    • Job Evaluation
      References
      • Michael Armstrong (2007) A hand book of Human resources Management
      • Royal institute of Public Administration 1988 Fact book Of Personnel Management.
      • www.foxlawson.com.com
      OMER ABD AL WAHAB MOHD.........MBA2009-164
      39
    • ?
      ?
      ?
      Question and Answer Session
      ?
      ?
      ?
      ?
      ?
      ?
      OMER ABD AL WAHAB MOHD.........MBA2009-164
      40
    • Job Evaluation
      THANK YOU
      Dear all this power point presentation is a property of:
      Omar Abd Al Wahab Mohammad , for any comments,Omar is reachable through Contacts:
      Email: awrad2000@yahoo.co.uk
      Blog:www.omarwahab.blogspot.com
      Mobile: +249123595252
      Khartoum, Sudan
      OMER ABD AL WAHAB MOHD.........MBA2009-164
      41