Wesolekpresentation 1
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5
×
 

Wesolekpresentation 1

on

  • 465 views

Final presentation

Final presentation

Statistics

Views

Total Views
465
Views on SlideShare
465
Embed Views
0

Actions

Likes
0
Downloads
0
Comments
0

0 Embeds 0

No embeds

Accessibility

Categories

Upload Details

Uploaded via as Microsoft PowerPoint

Usage Rights

© All Rights Reserved

Report content

Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
  • Full Name Full Name Comment goes here.
    Are you sure you want to
    Your message goes here
    Processing…
Post Comment
Edit your comment

    Wesolekpresentation 1 Wesolekpresentation 1 Presentation Transcript

    • Developing a More effective Organizational Structure in the Face of Staff Resistance to Change and Budgetary Restrictions
      Presented by: Andrew Wesolek
      Fall, 2009
    • As it Stands:
      Cataloging & Collections (technical services) – Bill (dept. head)
      3 units – Cataloging, Print & Media Acquisitions, Serials & Electronic Resources
      Cataloging
      3 catalog librarians
      Evaluations and official supervision done by Dean
      Workflow coordinated by dept. head
      Print & Media Acquisitions
      Performs acquisitions work for monographs and media including copy cataloging
      Mending, marking and mail room duties also fall all under this unit
      Used to be supervised by an LA3 (Library Assistant 3 – highest level for classified staff), but this position was eliminated recently after a resignation; now all members are directly supervised by dept. head
      1 library bindery tech (mending, mail)
      1 LA1 (marking, other misc duties including some work with serials)
      3 LA2 (1 person does acquisitions only, 1 copy cataloging only, 1 does some of both)
      Serials & Electronic Resources
      Maintenance of print and electronic serials, also database subscriptions and ebooks
      LA3 supervises other staff, including writing evaluations and coordinating workflow
      3 LA2, cross-trained but with own specialties within the units
      1 of the LA2 also spends approx. 20% of time on special projects from the dept. head (primarily catalog maintenance projects)
    • In Addition:
      Staff is extremely resistant to organizational change.
      The current structure is largely the result of retirements in conjunction with a hiring freeze.
      To this point, Bill has acted in a primarily reactionary fashion
      Any restructuring must be, at the very least, budgetary neutral.
    • The Suggestions:
      Thoroughly assess user needs (Bracke, et al. 2007).
      Create a vision (Phipps, 2004).
      Observe employees, their behaviors, and the consequences of their actions. This will help in understanding the unwritten ground rules of your organization (Simpson, 2009).
      Making unwritten ground rules explicit may prompt employees to change their behavior. This is helpful in strategizing your library’s culture (Simpson, 2009).
      Find ways to realize individuals’ needs through the organization. Allow staff the freedom to develop niches of expertise (Honea, 1997).
      Chart your current structure and compare it to your ideal structure. This may help in setting and achieving goals, particularly if employees are included in the process (Shepstone and Currie, 2008).
      Form a coalition to create and implement your vision; strive for short-term wins. This may include “managing up” to create a coherent vision for the broader library (Kotter, 2007).
      Strive for an adaptable organizational structure through communication, and staff participation (Farley, et. al. 1998).
      Decentralize your structure by striving for a team-orientation. Retain some centralized leadership to improve efficiency (Kreklow and Kinny, 2007).
      Include student help in team-oriented structures; this may enhance perceived quality of service while saving money (Owens, 1999).
      Empower Staff (Phipps, 2004).
      Focus on developing self-service technologies (Phipps, 2007).
    • Surprising/Interesting:
      Lack of literature relating specifically to a cataloging department
      Without very an extremely thorough understanding of the department’s employees, I could not recommend a specific structure.
      It will be necessary to implement library-wide change in order to overcome resistant staff.
    • Feedback:
      Positive, though not very specific.
      “Thanks so much for sending this on! Very well put together, and some great information.”
      And: “very germane to much of the management work I do.”
      I plan to follow up on this more in the spring