Slideshare.net (beta)

 
Post: 
Myspace Hi5 Friendster Xanga LiveJournal Facebook Blogger Tagged Typepad Freewebs BlackPlanet gigya icons



All comments

Add a comment on Slide 1

If you have a SlideShare account, login to comment; else you can comment as a guest


Showing 1-50 of 1 (more)

pepe382

From atomicjeep, 5 months ago

186 views  |  0 comments  |  1 favorite  |  0 downloads
 

Groups/Events

Not added to any group/event

 
 

Privacy InfoNew!

This slideshow is Public

 
Embed in your blog
Embed (wordpress.com)
custom

Slideshow Statistics
Total Views: 186
on Slideshare: 186
from embeds: 0* * Views from embeds since 21 Aug, 07

Slideshow transcript

Slide 1: A study of social presence in blended social work education Professor Walter LaMendola, PhD University of Denver

Slide 2: Council On Social Work Education (USA) • focus on e-learning & practice • a special national project • a subject of significance to the US social work profession

Slide 3: Components of Our Project • Comparing different forms of social work practice class delivery • Faculty development process • Organizational requirements for social work e-learning programming • Measures of student information literacy • Measures of student learning outcomes

Slide 4: Presentation Today • Introduce conceptual model • Examine our study of social work e- learning in terms of – the development of social presence – community of inquiry – and communities of practice related to the student's field experience. • Present preliminary data

Slide 5: Elements of an Educational Experience, Figure 1 from L. Rourke, et. al. (2001) Assessing Social Presence In Asynchronous Text-based Computer Conferencing,JDE.

Slide 6: Intersection of Community of Inquiry and Practice • Community of Inquiry: Critical thought about practice takes place • Community of Practice: Human values and ethics in action situate theory Community Community of of Inquiry Practice

Slide 7: Stephen Powell (2007)

Slide 8: Practical learning From: Garrison, D.R., Anderson, T. (2004) e-Learning in the 21st Century, p 57.

Slide 9: Communities of Practice Groups of people who share a concern, a set of problems, or a passion about a topic, and who deepen their knowledge and expertise in this area by interacting on an ongoing basis From: Wenger, McDermott and Snyder (2002) Cultivating Communities of Practice, p. 4

Slide 10: From Wenger (1998) Communities of Practice: Learning as a social system

Slide 11: Practices Learning From Andrew Cox (2005) What are communities of Learning? Journal of Information Science 31,6, p 529

Slide 12: Practical learning pre-senses From: Garrison, D.R. (2006) ONLINE COMMUNITY OF INQUIRY REVIEW: SOCIAL, COGNITIVE, AND TEACHING PRESENCE ISSUES DRAFT

Slide 13: Community * Range Mean Median S.D. All participants (N = 89) Connectedness 28 26.71 28 7.029 Learning 31 29.84 31 6.765 Community 56 56.55 58 12.681 As measured by the Rovai Classroom Community Scale (2002) *

Slide 14: Community /Social Sense • Classroom experience demands reflection and reflexivity, which is • Based on social and intellectual needs and interactions of practitioners and students, who are • An embodied practice community that situate shared values and ethics

Slide 15: Community is Social social Presence • Community is emotive; affective bonding (Etzioni) • A sense of “being there”, being situated, embodied • Forms social identity • A social context that includes cues, non- verbal expressions, movements

Slide 16: Creating Social Presence • How do we vary social presence in social work education to support practitioner development? Opportunities of self disclosure Spontaneity and humor Creating awe Expressing emotions Forms of discussion • Who are our community members becoming; how are their practice identities formed? Field Integration Seminar included

Slide 17: Measuring Social Presence • Analysis of classroom discussions – Coding for social presence (Garrison et al) • Richardson & Swan (2003) measure • Short, Christie, & Williams (1976) measure • Student and faculty interviews

Slide 18: Social Presence – Short et al (1976) – Studies have shown it to be robust in measuring social presence (Biacco et al 2004) – Semantic differential – Warm, Sensitive, Large, Beautiful, Personal, Colorful, Open, Active, Sociable

Slide 19: Social Presence Mean Face to face 5.34 Blended 4.32 Blended Field 5.43

Slide 20: Preliminary discussion analysis • Blended field more comments by students • Blended field lengthier comments by students • Students comments affective

Slide 21: Sample of Qualitative Results • What is their perception of their learning? – “The field experience was the most beneficial to me ...having other students share their experience...The field instructor had a lot of experience that she was able to share with us. It is hard to pass up discussions... I do not think a student can get much out of reading without experience and discussion with others... Forming a sense of community, I learn better through experiential learning.” • Which aspects were most effective for facilitating social presence? – “The field experience was the most beneficial, because it forced me to get out and experience issues that I hadn't before... I haven't taken the time to interact as much as I would like to but I know that people would've been available for more interaction if I'd taken the effort.

Slide 22: Possible future considerations • More time in field based learning centers • More student use of technology, multimedia to communicate experience and practical learning • More co-teaching with field supervisors, using video conferencing • Courses offered from the field site