Horngrenima14e ch12


Published on

Published in: Business, Technology
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

No Downloads
Total views
On SlideShare
From Embeds
Number of Embeds
Embeds 0
No embeds

No notes for slide

Horngrenima14e ch12

  1. 1. Cost Allocation Introduction to Management Accounting Chapter 12
  2. 2. General Framework for Cost Allocation Four types of cost objectives: Service departments Producing departments Products/services, and Customers. Learning Objective 1 Cost allocation methods comprise an important part of a company’s cost management system.
  3. 3. General Framework for Cost Allocation Service departments exist only to support other departments or customers. Producing departments are where employees Work on the organization’s products or services.
  4. 4. General Framework for Cost Allocation Indirect costs must be allocated. Direct costs can be physically traced to each department. Many companies develop allocation methods to assign service department costs to the producing departments.
  5. 5. General Framework for Cost Allocation Increasingly, companies measure and manage the costs and profitability of their customers. All organizations accumulate costs for their products or services for financial reporting purposes. Customer related costs include: Order processing Customer service sales commissions Dedicated customer support
  6. 6. General Framework for Cost Allocation A cost driver that has a logical, cause-effect relationship to the cost will be used as a cost-allocation base An accounting system will assign to a department’s output all its direct costs plus all the indirect costs allocated to it.
  7. 7. Allocation of Service Department Costs Learning Objective 2 Establish the details regarding cost allocation in advance. 1 Allocate variable- and fixed- cost pools separately. 2 Evaluate performance using budgets for each production and service department. 3
  8. 8. Service Department Example Computer Department 5-year lease School of Business School of Engineering
  9. 9. Service Department Example Suppose there are two major purposes for the allocation: Predicting economic effects of the use of the computer Motivating departments and individuals to use its capabilities more fully
  10. 10. Service Department Example The primary activity performed is computer processing. Resources consumed include 1. Processing time 2. Operator time 3. Consulting time 4. Energy 5. Materials 6. Building space The budget formula for the forthcoming year is $100,000 monthly fixed cost plus $200 variable cost per hour of computer time used.
  11. 11. Variable-Cost Pool The cost driver for the variable-cost pool is Actual hours of computer time used. Therefore, variable costs should be allocated as follows: Budgeted unit rate X Actual hours of computer time used
  12. 12. Variable-Cost Pool Consider the allocation of variable costs to a department that uses 600 hours of computer time. Suppose inefficiencies in the computer department caused the variable costs to be $140,000 instead of $120,000. 600 hours × $200 = $120,000
  13. 13. Variable-Cost Pool A good cost-allocation scheme would allocate only the $120,000 to the consuming department and would let the $20,000 remain as an unallocated unfavorable budget variance of the computer department. This scheme holds computer department managers responsible for the $20,000 and reduces the resentment of user managers.
  14. 14. Fixed-Cost Pool The cost driver for the fixed-cost pool is the amount of capacity required when the computer facilities were acquired. Fixed costs should be allocated as follows: Budgeted percent of capacity available for use × Total budgeted fixed costs
  15. 15. Fixed-Cost Pool Suppose the deans had originally predicted the long-run average monthly usage as follows: School of Business: 210 hours School of Engineering: 490 hours How is the fixed-cost pool allocated? Business: 210 ÷ 700 = 30% $100,000 X .3 = $30,000 Engineering: 490 ÷ 700 = 70% $100,000 X .7 = $70,000
  16. 16. Fixed-Cost Pool This predetermined lump-sum approach is based on the long-run capacity available to the user, regardless of actual usage from month to month. A major strength of using capacity available rather than capacity used when allocating budgeted fixed costs is that actual usage by user departments does not affect the short-run allocations to other user departments.
  17. 17. Reciprocal Services Service departments often support other service departments in addition to production departments. There are two popular methods for allocating service department costs: The direct method The step-down method
  18. 18. Direct and Step-Down Methods The direct method ignores other service departments when any given service department’s costs are allocated to the revenue-producing (operating) departments. The step-down method recognizes that some service departments support the activities in other service departments as well as those in production departments. Learning Objective 3
  19. 19. Direct and Step-Down Methods Facilities management cost = $1,260,000 Human resources cost = $240,000 Total square footage in production departments: 15,000 processing + 3,000 assembly = 18,000 Total employees in production departments 16 processing + 64 assembly = 80 Square footage in human resources = 9,000
  20. 20. Direct Method Facilities management cost allocated to processing = (15,000 ÷ 18,000) × $1,260,000 = $1,050,000 Facilities management cost allocated to assembly = (3,000 ÷ 18,000) × $1,260,000 = $210,000
  21. 21. Direct Method Human resources cost allocated to processing = (16 ÷ 80) × $240,000 = $48,000 Human resources cost allocated to assembly = (64 ÷ 80) × $240,000 = $192,000
  22. 22. Step-Down Method Facilities management allocation: To assembly: (3 ÷ 27) × $1,260,000 = $140,000 To human resources: (9 ÷ 27) × $1,260,000 = $420,000 To processing: (15 ÷ 27) × $1,260,000 = $700,000
  23. 23. Step-Down Method Human resources allocation: To assembly: (64 ÷ 80) × $660,000 = $528,000 $240,000 + $420,000 = $660,000 To processing: (16 ÷ 80) × $660,000 = $132,000
  24. 24. Step-Down Method Processing department Direct Step-Down Direct department costs $1,000,000 $1,000,000 From facilities management 1,050,00 700,000 From Personnel 48,000 132,000 Total costs $2,098,000 $1,832,000
  25. 25. Step-Down Method Assembly department Direct Step-Down Direct department costs $1,600,000 $1,600,000 From facilities management 210,000 140,000 From personnel 192,000 528,000 Total costs $2,002,000 $2,268,000
  26. 26. Costs Not Related to Cost Drivers Guidelines: Identify additional cost drivers. 1 Allocate all costs by the direct or step-down method using square footage as the cost- allocation base. 2
  27. 27. Traditional Approach 1. Divide the costs in each producing departments. 2. Assign direct costs to the appropriate products, services, or customers. Learning Objective 4 Direct costs Indirect costs
  28. 28. Traditional Approach 3. Select one or more cost pools and related cost drivers in each production department. Indirect departmental costs Cost pool Cost pool Cost pool
  29. 29. Traditional Approach 4. Allocate costs Costs Product B Product A Product C
  30. 30. Activity-Based Costing Determine the key components of the system. Step 1: Step 2: Develop the relationships among resources, activities, and cost objectives.
  31. 31. Activity-Based Costing Step 3: Collect relevant data concerning costs and the physical flow of the cost-driver units among resources and activities. Step 4: Calculate and interpret the new activity-based cost information.
  32. 32. Allocation of Customer Costs Customer profitability depends on more than gross margin, it depends on the costs incurred to fulfill customer orders and to provide other customer services. Allocate costs associated with customer actions to customers. Learning Objective 5
  33. 33. Allocation of Customer Costs <ul><li>Small order quantity </li></ul><ul><li>Many order changes </li></ul><ul><li>Large amounts of pre- </li></ul><ul><li>and post-sales support </li></ul><ul><li>Expedited scheduling </li></ul><ul><li>Special delivery requirements </li></ul><ul><li>Frequent returns </li></ul><ul><li>Large order quantity </li></ul><ul><li>Few order changes </li></ul><ul><li>Little pre- and </li></ul><ul><li>post-sales support </li></ul><ul><li>Regular scheduling </li></ul><ul><li>Standard delivery </li></ul><ul><li>Few returns </li></ul>Customer Type 1 Customer Type 2 High Cost to Serve Low Cost to Serve
  34. 34. Allocation of Customer Costs Customer Type 1 Low Cost to Serve <ul><li>Buys a mix of products that </li></ul><ul><li>have high gross margins </li></ul><ul><li>Has a low cost-to-serve % </li></ul><ul><li>Has a high level of profitability </li></ul><ul><li>Buys a mix of products that </li></ul><ul><li>have lower gross margins </li></ul><ul><li>Has a high cost-to-serve % </li></ul><ul><li>Has a low level of profitability </li></ul>Customer Type 2 High Cost to Serve
  35. 35. Allocation of Customer Costs Assume Cedar City Distributors (CCD), distributes many products to retail outlets. The products are classified into just two product groups – apparel and sports gear. <ul><li>CCD has two types of customers: </li></ul><ul><li>Small store </li></ul><ul><li>Large store </li></ul>
  36. 36. Allocation of Customer Costs CCD uses a simple cost accounting system to calculate both product and customer profitability. The only direct costs are costs of the purchase of apparel and sports gear products. Indirect costs are allocated to the product groups using a single indirect cost pool for all indirect costs with “pounds of product” as the allocation base. Costs
  37. 37. Allocation of Customer Costs Small Stores Large Stores Cases Profit Margin Total Cases Profit Margin Total per case Profit Margin per case Profit Margin Apparel 600 $265.00 $159,000 800 $265.00 $212,000 Sports Gear 200 315.00 63,000 800 315.00 252,000 222,000 464,000 Profit Margin Percentage 43.7% 41.4% <ul><li>To determine customer profitability: </li></ul><ul><li>1. Calculate the profit margin per case for each product </li></ul><ul><li>Use the product mix ordered by each customer to calculate profitability </li></ul>
  38. 38. Allocation of Costs-to-Serve Might number of customer orders be a more plausible cost-allocation base? The cost of resources used for order processing and customer service activities should be included in a separate cost pool and allocated on the basis of number of orders. This system gives managers at CCD more insight into operations, and a tool to measure and manage customer profitability.
  39. 39. Allocation of Central Costs Many managers believe it is desirable to fully allocate all costs to the revenue- producing parts of the organization. Whenever possible, the preferred driver for central services is usage. Learning Objective 6 If a company does allocate the costs of central services based on sales, although costs do not vary in proportion to sales, it should use budgeted, not actual, sales.
  40. 40. Allocation of Central Costs Usage Revenue Cost of goods sold Total assets Total cost of each division Not always economically viable
  41. 41. Allocation of Joint Costs Learning Objective 7 Two conventional ways of allocating joint costs to products are widely used: Physical units Relative sales values Joint costs include all inputs of material, labor, and overhead costs that are incurred before the split-off point.
  42. 42. Allocation of Joint Costs The physical-units method requires a common physical unit for measuring the output of each product. The joint costs are allocated based on each product’s percentage of the total physical units produced. Allocation of joint costs should not affect decisions about the individual products.
  43. 43. Physical-Units Method Dow Chemical produces two chemicals, X and Y. The joint cost is $100,000. X sells for $.09 per liter and Y for $.06. Allocation Sales Value at Liters Weighting of Joint Costs Split-off Point X 1,000,000 (10/15)X$100,000 $ 66,667 $ 90,000 Y 500,000 (5/15)X$100,000 33,333 30,000 1,500,000 100,000 120,000
  44. 44. Relative-Sales-Value Method The joint costs are allocated based on each product’s sales value as a percentage of the total sales value at split-off.
  45. 45. Relative-Sales-Value Method Relative Sales Value at Allocation Spit-off Point Weighting of Joint Costs X $ 90,000 (90/120)X$100,000 $ 75,000 Y 3 0,000 (30/120X$100,000 25,000 $120,000 $100,000 When weighting is based on the sales value of the individual products, the allocation of a cost to one product depends upon the sales value of both products.
  46. 46. By-Product Costs A by-product is not individually identifiable until manufacturing reaches a split-off point. They have relatively insignificant sales value.
  47. 47. By-Product Costs If an item is accounted for as a by-product, only separable costs are allocated to it. All joint costs are allocated to the main products. Any revenues from by-products, less their separable costs, are deducted from the cost of the main products.
  48. 48. The End End of Chapter 12