Done by: Fatma ALNaabi (66754) Athra ALYazidi (61642) Contexts for evaluating educational software

Title: Contexts for evaluating educational software Author: A. Jones, , E. Scanlon, C. Tosunoglu, E. Morris, S. Ross,P. Butcher, J. Greenberg. Date: (1999) Citation: A. Jones, , E. Scanlon, C. Tosunoglu, E. Morris, S. Ross,P. Butcher, J. Greenberg.(1999). Contexts for evaluating educational software, Interacting with Computers.

Title: Contexts for evaluating educational software

Author: A. Jones, , E. Scanlon, C. Tosunoglu, E. Morris, S. Ross,P. Butcher, J. Greenberg.

Date: (1999)

Citation:

A. Jones, , E. Scanlon, C. Tosunoglu, E. Morris, S. Ross,P. Butcher, J. Greenberg.(1999). Contexts for evaluating educational software, Interacting with Computers.

Outline Purpose. The Jigsaw evaluation model. The CIAO! framework for evaluation. Example. The evaluation process design.

Purpose.

The Jigsaw evaluation model.

The CIAO! framework for evaluation.

Example.

The evaluation process design.

Purpose In their research, Jones and others of “Contexts for evaluating educational software” studied the difference between the software evaluation practices in the educational community and (human–computer interaction) community. These differences were examined by looking at usability and learning and by considering the use of a particular framework for CAL (Computer Assisted Learning) evaluation.

In their research, Jones and others of “Contexts for evaluating educational software” studied the difference between the software evaluation practices in the educational community and (human–computer interaction) community.

These differences were examined by looking at usability and learning and by considering the use of a particular framework for CAL (Computer Assisted Learning) evaluation.

The Jigsaw evaluation model Purpose: to measure the usability of software and its effects on learning and to increase the teachers' knowledge about the integration between those two variables. Three main levels: The first level concerned on four tasks: learning tasks, general learning tasks, application operational tasks and system operational tasks.

Purpose:

to measure the usability of software and its effects on learning and to increase the teachers' knowledge about the integration between those two variables.

Three main levels:

The first level concerned on four tasks: learning tasks, general learning tasks, application operational tasks and system operational tasks.

The Jigsaw evaluation model Integration within the learning and operational tasks was focused on the second level of the Jigsaw evaluation model The integration between the learning and operational tasks was represented by the third level of the model.

Integration within the learning and operational tasks was focused on the second level of the Jigsaw evaluation model

The integration between the learning and operational tasks was represented by the third level of the model.

The CIAO! framework for evaluation Purpose: the effectiveness and quality CAL development. Three main domains: Context interaction attitudes and outcomes.

Purpose:

the effectiveness and quality CAL development.

Three main domains:

Context

interaction

attitudes and outcomes.

The CIAO! framework for evaluation The 3 main points of the domains: Rationale Data Methods

The 3 main points of the domains:

Rationale

Data

Methods

Example:

The evaluation process design The iterative process of evaluation:

The iterative process of evaluation: