Your SlideShare is downloading. ×
0
Cyber Libertarianism - Real Internet Freedom (Thierer & Szoka)
Cyber Libertarianism - Real Internet Freedom (Thierer & Szoka)
Cyber Libertarianism - Real Internet Freedom (Thierer & Szoka)
Cyber Libertarianism - Real Internet Freedom (Thierer & Szoka)
Cyber Libertarianism - Real Internet Freedom (Thierer & Szoka)
Cyber Libertarianism - Real Internet Freedom (Thierer & Szoka)
Cyber Libertarianism - Real Internet Freedom (Thierer & Szoka)
Cyber Libertarianism - Real Internet Freedom (Thierer & Szoka)
Cyber Libertarianism - Real Internet Freedom (Thierer & Szoka)
Cyber Libertarianism - Real Internet Freedom (Thierer & Szoka)
Cyber Libertarianism - Real Internet Freedom (Thierer & Szoka)
Cyber Libertarianism - Real Internet Freedom (Thierer & Szoka)
Cyber Libertarianism - Real Internet Freedom (Thierer & Szoka)
Cyber Libertarianism - Real Internet Freedom (Thierer & Szoka)
Cyber Libertarianism - Real Internet Freedom (Thierer & Szoka)
Cyber Libertarianism - Real Internet Freedom (Thierer & Szoka)
Cyber Libertarianism - Real Internet Freedom (Thierer & Szoka)
Cyber Libertarianism - Real Internet Freedom (Thierer & Szoka)
Cyber Libertarianism - Real Internet Freedom (Thierer & Szoka)
Cyber Libertarianism - Real Internet Freedom (Thierer & Szoka)
Cyber Libertarianism - Real Internet Freedom (Thierer & Szoka)
Cyber Libertarianism - Real Internet Freedom (Thierer & Szoka)
Cyber Libertarianism - Real Internet Freedom (Thierer & Szoka)
Cyber Libertarianism - Real Internet Freedom (Thierer & Szoka)
Cyber Libertarianism - Real Internet Freedom (Thierer & Szoka)
Cyber Libertarianism - Real Internet Freedom (Thierer & Szoka)
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5
×

Thanks for flagging this SlideShare!

Oops! An error has occurred.

×
Saving this for later? Get the SlideShare app to save on your phone or tablet. Read anywhere, anytime – even offline.
Text the download link to your phone
Standard text messaging rates apply

Cyber Libertarianism - Real Internet Freedom (Thierer & Szoka)

1,861

Published on

Adam Thierer & Berin Szoka of The Progress & Freedom Foundation are attempting to articulate the core principles of cyber-libertarianism to provide the public and policymakers with a better …

Adam Thierer & Berin Szoka of The Progress & Freedom Foundation are attempting to articulate the core principles of cyber-libertarianism to provide the public and policymakers with a better understanding of this alternative vision for ordering the affairs of cyberspace. We invite comments and suggestions regarding how we should refine and build-out this outline. We hope this outline serves as the foundation of a book we eventually want to pen defending what we regard as “Real Internet Freedom.”

Published in: Technology, News & Politics
0 Comments
1 Like
Statistics
Notes
  • Be the first to comment

No Downloads
Views
Total Views
1,861
On Slideshare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
1
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
20
Comments
0
Likes
1
Embeds 0
No embeds

Report content
Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
No notes for slide

Transcript

  • 1. 01000110011100100110010101100101011001000110111101101101001000000100011001110010011001010110010101100100011011110110110100100000010001100111001001100101011001010110010001101111011011010010000001000110011100100110010101100101011001000110111101101101001000000100011001110010011001010110010101100100011011110110110100100000010001100111001001100101011001010110010001101111011011010010000001000110011100100110010101100101011001000110111101101101001000000100011001110010011001010110010101100100011011110110110100
    Cyber-Libertarianism The Case for Real Internet FreedomVersion 1.0 - Summer 2009
    Adam Thierer & Berin Szoka
  • 2. Our Purpose
    To articulate the core principles of cyber-libertarianism
    To provide the public and policymakers with a better understanding of this alternative vision for ordering the affairs of cyberspace
    Outline for a future book about “Real Internet Freedom”
    To reclaim the term from those who have bastardized it as a mandate for government control of new media
    2
  • 3. Part I: What is Cyber-Libertarianism?
    3
  • 4. Definition of Cyber-Libertarianism
    Individuals—acting in whatever capacity they choose (as citizens, consumers, companies, or collectives)—should be at liberty to pursue their own tastes and interests online
    Mottos: “Live & Let Live” & “Hands Off the ‘Net!”
    Seeks to minimize the scope of state coercion in solving social and economic problems online
    Looks instead to voluntary solutions and arrangementsbased on mutual agreement
    4
  • 5. Real Internet Freedom
    Is not freedom for the State to reorder our affairs
    To supposedly benefit certain people or groups; or
    To improve some amorphous “public interest”
    It’s freedom fromstate action
    Is not about imposing a single utopian vision
    It’s about enabling a “Utopia of Utopias” (per philosopher Robert Nozick): A framework within which many different models of organizing commerce and community can flourish alongside, and in competition with, each other,
    This allows users to pursue their own values and interests and create their own communities
    5
  • 6. Application in Social & Economic Contexts
    Cyber-libertarians draw no distinction between social and economic freedomwhen applying this vision:
    • Social Freedom: Individuals should be granted liberty of conscience, thought, opinion, speech, and expression in online environments
    • 7. Economic Freedom: Individuals should be granted liberty of contract, innovation, and exchange in online environments
    It’s not enough to support liberty of action in one sphere
    Foreclosing freedom in one sphere will eventually affect freedom in the other
    6
  • 8. What about “Code Failures” ?
    The digital equivalent of so-called “market failures”
    We support voluntary, spontaneous, bottom-up, marketplace responses
    We oppose coercive, top-down, governmental solutions
    Only market-driven approaches offer the rapidity and nimbleness necessary to be effective because the Internet is a uniquely dynamic medium
    Cyber-libertarians have a strong aversion to:
    The politicization of technology issues
    Efforts to replace market processes with bureaucratic processes
    7
  • 9. Defining “Markets” Broadly
    Includes monetary & non-monetary transactions
    Includes proprietary & non-proprietary modes of production
    Collaborative, non-proprietary technologies & efforts (e.g., Wikipedia and open source software) can also be “markets”
    But the cyber-libertarian does reject the notion these models are the only acceptable model or that they should be imposed on us by law
    We support techno-agnosticism:  Lawmakers and courts should not be tilting the balance in one direction or the other towards on the “open vs. closed” spectrum
    8
  • 10. Part II: The Intellectual Foundations of Cyber-Libertarianism
    9
  • 11. Traditional Libertarian Philosophy
    Natural Rights philosophers– John Locke, Ayn Rand, The Founders
    Utilitarian philosophers– John Stuart Mill (On Liberty), Herbert Spencer
    “Austrian School” of Economics– Ludwig von Mises, F.A. Hayek, Murray Rothbard
    Milton Freidman(Free to Choose)
    Robert Nozick– argued for a minimalist state as a “utopia of utopias”
    Thomas Sowell– critiqued The Vision of the Anointed
    Richard Epstein– (Simple Rules for a Complex World)
    10
  • 12. Modern Cyber-Libertarian Theorists
    Ithiel de Sola Pool(Technologies of Freedom)
    Alvin Toffler(The Third Wave, Future Shock)
    George Gilder(Microcosm, Telecosm)
    Peter Huber(Law & Disorder in Cyberspace)
    Tom W. Bell
    Eugene Volokh
    Jonathan Emord(Freedom, Technology & the First Amendment)
    Technology Liberation Front– the cyber-libertarian group blog since 2004
    11
  • 13. Internet Exceptionalists
    Nicholas Negroponte(Being Digital)
    John Perry Barlow(“Declaration of the Independence of Cyberspace”)
    David Post
    Eric Goldman
    H. Brian Holland
    12
  • 14. Part III: The Contrast with Cyber-Collectivism
    13
  • 15. Cyber-Collectivism Defined
    The opposite of cyber-libertarianism: cyber-choices should be guided by the State or an elite according to some amorphous “general will” or “public interest” 
    Distant influences of Plato, Rousseau & Marx
    Cyber-collectivism comes in many flavors, however:
    “Left”: focused on economic fairness, “neutrality,” and equality of outcomes
    “Right”: controlling the Internet’s impact on culture or security
    Not as philosophically coherent as cyber-libertarianism—which also comes in many flavors but shares a larger core of common agreement
    14
  • 16. Relationship Between Cyber-Collectivism & “Digital Commons” Movement
    Leftist cyber-collectivists & the “information commons” or “digital commons” movement share belief that digital resources should be shared or commonly owned
    We don’t object to commons, only to mandating them
    Cyber-collectivists
    Are generally not Marxists; few of them call for state ownership of the information means of production
    Might better be thought of a “cyber-social Democrats” (European) or “Digital New Dealers” (American)
    Advocate a generous role for law and regulation in many online matters, but do not typically resort to full-blown nationalization
    15
  • 17. Exponents of Cyber-Collectivism
    Lawrence Lessig (Code)
    Tim Wu (Who Controls the Internet?)
    YochaiBenkler (The Wealth of Networks)
    Jonathan Zittrain (The Future of the Internet & How to Stop It)
    David Bollier (Viral Spiral)
    Harvard’s Berkman Center*
    New America Foundation*
    Public Knowledge*
    16
    (*We are, of course, generalizing a bit here. Not everyone in these institutions is a cyber-collectivist and, again, there are many flavors of cyber-collectivism, just as there are many flavors of cyber-libertarianism.)
  • 18. Part IV: How Cyber-Libertarians Think about Various Policy Issues 
    17
  • 19. Issue: Free Speech & Online Child Safety
    The First Amendment is of paramount importance and should apply equally to all speakers and media platforms
    We favor parental empowerment and education, and industry self-regulation over censorship
    “Household standards” should trump “community standards” & “public interest” regulatory mandates
    18
  • 20. Issue:Privacy Policy & Online Advertising
    The real “Big Brother” problem is state surveillance, not private data collection
    Privacy is a profoundly subjective condition
    Regulations to “protect privacy” could have serious unintended consequences for freedom of speech and the growth of online content and commerce
    User empowerment & industry self-regulation represent the superior way to address privacy concerns
    19
  • 21. Issue: Net Neutrality & Infrastructure Regulation
    “Open access” regulation is nothing more than infrastructure socialism
    Network operators should be free to own, operate and price their systems & services as they see fit, subject only to enforcement of their terms of service & other contracts with their users
    New entry & innovation work better than regulating yesterday’s networks & technologies
    20
  • 22. “Market power” & “code failures” are best dealt with by spontaneous evolution of markets & new entry, not bureaucratic micro-management of old technologies or market structures
    Cyber-markets are evolutionary & dynamic
    Disruptive innovation usually unseats incumbents
    Regulation often creates, or tends to foster, most monopolies
    Antitrust is often used as weapon by disgruntled marketplace competitors to hobble rivals
    21
    Issue: Antitrust & Competition
  • 23. Issue: Internet Taxation & State Regulation
    No special taxes should be imposed on online services or Internet access
    If the Net disrupts traditional tax bases, that should be seen as an opportunity to reform those tax systems
    States shouldn’t be regulating the uniquely global medium of the Internet or imposing barriers to interstate commerce
    22
  • 24. Issue: Online Gambling
    People should be free to do as they please with their money
    We shouldn’t protect state-run lotteries and casinos
    Internet gambling is likely impossible to shut down entirely anyway, given the uniquely global nature of the Internet
    23
  • 25. Issue: Copyright & Patents
    Cyber-libertarians are deeply divided over IP issues (esp. copyright), reflecting a long-standing division among libertarians on these issues
    Some believe IP rights are a natural extension of traditional property rights and/or a sensible way to incentivize scientific and artistic creativity
    Others believe no one has a right to “property-tize” intangible creations or that copyright is simply industrial protectionism
    There are many views in between
    24
  • 26. For more information…
    Please visit The Technology Liberation Front
    www.techliberation.com
    The cyber-libertarian group public policy blog
    21 contributors
    4,500+ posts since 2004
    16,000 unique monthly viewers
    25
  • 27. About the Authors
    Adam Thierer is a Senior Fellow at The Progress & Freedom Foundation (PFF) & Director of PFF’s Center for Digital Media Freedom (CDMF). Thierer analyzes public policy developments that impact the economic and social aspects of the media industry, including related First Amendment issues. Prior to joining PFF in 2005, he was Director of Telecommunications Studies at the Cato Institute and a Fellow in Economic Policy at the Heritage Foundation.Berin Szoka is a PFF Senior Fellow & Director of PFF’s Center for Internet Freedom (CIF). Szoka studies the laws and regulations that govern cyberspace. Previously, he was an Associate in the Communications Practice Group at Latham and Watkins LLP, where he advised clients on regulations affecting the Internet and telecommunications industries.
    26

×