CanSat 2008: ITESM Mexico City Final Presentation

Loading...

Flash Player 9 (or above) is needed to view presentations.
We have detected that you do not have it on your computer. To install it, go here.

0 comments

Post a comment

    Post a comment
    Embed Video
    Edit your comment Cancel

    Favorites, Groups & Events

    CanSat 2008: ITESM Mexico City Final Presentation - Presentation Transcript

    1. CanSat Competition 2008 Final Presentation Instituto Tecnológico y de Estudios Superiores de Monterrey, Campus Ciudad de México Alfredo Necoechea H. Bernardo Estrella E. Gerardo Cruz G. Roberto Ortega E.
    2. Presentation Outline
      • Design Overview
      • Raw Data Plots
      • Processed / Analyzed Data Plots
      • Outcome of flight operations / failure analysis
      • Comparison of actual CANOPS to planned CANOPS
    3. Design Overview
    4. Design Overview
    5. Raw Data Plots
      • Altitude
      • Coordinates (position plot)
      • Temperature
      Note: Test results. Not from actual launch
    6. Processed / Analyzed Data Plots Note: Test results. Not from actual launch
    7. Outcome of flight operations / failure analysis
      • Parachute
        • Complicated to balance (calibrate)
        • Requires to be tested at high altitudes
        • Easy to get tangled
          • No CanSat protrusions allowed
    8. Outcome of flight operations / failure analysis
      • Servos and DC Motor
        • Extra power supplies required
        • To noisy
          • Interference between each other
          • Big capacitors needed
    9. Outcome of flight operations / failure analysis
      • GPS
        • Inaccurate
        • Big and heavy antenna
        • Transmits at 4800 bps
        • Requires extra power supply
        • Takes time to lock satellites
    10. Outcome of flight operations / failure analysis
      • Ultrasonic sensor
        • Big
        • Requires extra programming cycles
        • Overflow
    11. Outcome of flight operations / failure analysis
      • Transceivers
        • Operate at 9600 bps
      • Camera
        • Space and storage
    12. Outcome of flight operations / failure analysis
      • Processors
          • PIC
          • PICAXE
          • BasicSTAMP (used)
            • Lack of floating point
            • Trigonometric Functions
    13. Outcome of flight operations / failure analysis
      • Soil Sample
        • Outside protrusions did not let the initial idea accommodate
      • Navigation
        • The use of accelerometers could have helped to know and correct positions.
        • Instead of a propelled thrust, a compressed air or propulsion system could work better since it may be east to locate.
    14. Comparison of actual CANOPS to planned CANOPS
      • Planned CANOPS
        • Navigation
        • Constant information sending
          • Altitude, latitude, longitude, temperature
        • Information processing and plotting in program with graph
    15. Comparison of actual CANOPS to planned CANOPS
      • Planned CANOPS
    16. Comparison of actual CANOPS to planned CANOPS
      • Planned CANOPS
    17. Comparison of actual CANOPS to planned CANOPS
      • Actual CANOPS
        • Parachute got tangled
          • Couldn’t navigate
          • Couldn’t open
        • Constant resetting caused transceivers to loss configuration
          • Transmission failure

    + American Astronautical SocietyAmerican Astronautical Society, 2 years ago

    custom

    781 views, 0 favs, 3 embeds more stats

    Final presentation by ITESM Mexico City at CanSat 2 more

    More info about this document

    © All Rights Reserved

    Go to text version

    • Total Views 781
      • 752 on SlideShare
      • 29 from embeds
    • Comments 0
    • Favorites 0
    • Downloads 10
    Most viewed embeds
    • 25 views on http://www.astronautical.org
    • 3 views on http://astronautical.org
    • 1 views on http://66.102.9.104

    more

    All embeds
    • 25 views on http://www.astronautical.org
    • 3 views on http://astronautical.org
    • 1 views on http://66.102.9.104

    less

    Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
    Flag as inappropriate

    Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate. If needed, use the feedback form to let us know more details.

    Cancel
    File a copyright complaint
    Having problems? Go to our helpdesk?

    Categories