Uploaded on

'Redefining reference at the Glucksman Library' case study by Liz Dore & Donna O Doibhlin University of Limerick. Case study presented at 'Information Innovators: Librarians evolving in the digital …

'Redefining reference at the Glucksman Library' case study by Liz Dore & Donna O Doibhlin University of Limerick. Case study presented at 'Information Innovators: Librarians evolving in the digital environment' the Academic & Special Libraries conference 2014

More in: Education
  • Full Name Full Name Comment goes here.
    Are you sure you want to
    Your message goes here
    Be the first to comment
    Be the first to like this
No Downloads

Views

Total Views
605
On Slideshare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
12

Actions

Shares
Downloads
1
Comments
0
Likes
0

Embeds 0

No embeds

Report content

Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
    No notes for slide
  • Not quite, but we are on the path! No way back

Transcript

  • 1. STEPS - Space, Technology, Education, & People for Success  to redefining the reference service at the Glucksman Library, University of Limerick. Liz Dore & Donna Ó Doibhlin
  • 2. STEPS  Why?  What we did?  Outcomes
  • 3. Why? What? How?
  • 4. Information Desk Working Group  User needs changing  Reference queries declining  Training needs of staff  Query Desk Information Sheet  Training Programme  Library Referrals Process
  • 5. Sample Query Sheet – April 2012
  • 6. Sample Query Sheet – February 2014
  • 7. December 2012 January 2014 Overall query breakdown by type Catalogue Research Help Remote access- Overall query breakdown by type Referencing - Endnote Catalogue Remote access- quick look catalogue Research Help Referencing - Endnote quick look catalogue 16% 26% 29% 7% 3% 0% 74% 3% Breakdown of total queries Information 2% Procedural 98% 26% 16% Breakdown of total queries Information 4% Procedural 96%
  • 8. Programme for Staff Training  In house      Reference Interview Query Desk Sheet Referrals Process Subject Specific Resources Feedback Sessions  External  Planning and Conducting Searches  Google tips for the Web  ‘Understanding User needs in an academic environment’
  • 9. Gathering Feedback………. Sample In-house form The basic skills to navigate databases to help students More reviews of databases and journals to become more familiar
  • 10. Library Referrals Process established . . .  Three Tier approach to answering queries…
  • 11. How we kept the momentum going initially……  Training Screenshots / Subject portals / Resource Classes Challenges & Benefits:  Difficult to sustain the project with other responsibilities  Maintaining focus on task at hand  Encouraging attendance of non core desk staff  A more efficient desk service  A closer working relationship between desk staff & IS librarians
  • 12. Staff/Focus Changes  Maternity leave  Front of House Committee  Realising your research value workshops  Library Quality Review  Reviews of QuestionPoint & Chat service
  • 13. In redefining the reference service
  • 14. In the interim . . .  We moved from here:
  • 15. In the interim . . .  To here – new single service area & self-issue
  • 16. In the interim . . .  Consultation area, appointment cards & LOD mobile
  • 17. In the interim . . . Statistics: Sept 2012 68 QP queries & Sept 2013 177 QP queries
  • 18. LISD Quality Review - Library priorities changed - all staff had to focus on the LISD Quality Review - Front of house group kind of lost its mojo . . but the pace of change never abated
  • 19. Front of House Committee  Recently re-established  Representatives from all sections within library:     Information services Technical & Digital Services Readers’ Services Administration
  • 20. Front of House Committee Terms of reference:  To formulate and oversee policies for front-of-house library services in line with library strategies & objectives  To develop mechanisms for the translation of such policies into achievable operational criteria  To monitor the application & consequences of agreed policies
  • 21. Immediate agenda for the FOH Committee  Conduct staff training needs analysis  Evaluate virtual interfaces & training requirements  Review statistics collected  Survey staff formally/informally
  • 22. Potential agenda:  QuestionPoint queries - Readers’ Services?  Knowledge Bank  Chat – Readers’ Services  Review of statistics –KPIs – analyse strategically  Library suggestions  Signage
  • 23. also . . . potentially:  Training for all library staff  Displaying Library & Faculty publications  First 7 weeks/peer advisors programmes  Future-proofing our library & staff
  • 24. The Reference Service Redefined?