Poster RDAP13 Model for Developing Data Management Policy Language


Published on

William Corey, Nathan Hall, Wendy Mann and Thomas Wilson

Research Data Access & Preservation Summit 2013
Baltimore, MD April 4, 2013 #rdap13

  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

No Downloads
Total views
On SlideShare
From Embeds
Number of Embeds
Embeds 0
No embeds

No notes for slide

Poster RDAP13 Model for Developing Data Management Policy Language

  1. 1. Model for Developing Data Management Policy Language Research Data Access and Preservation, 2013 Wendy Mann Bill Corey Tom Wilson Nathan Hall George Mason University University of Virginia University of Alabama Virginia TechRepresentatives from four ASERL libraries analyzed existing institutional data management policies in order to develop model data management policy language. Outlined below is an illustration of data sharing and management milestones and a timeline of the ASERL Data Policy Working Groups process. External Data Management Policy and Practice Context December, 2009 February 26, 2003 International Journal of Digital Curation January 18, 2011 July, 2011 NIH-OD-03-032 September, 2007 NSF Data Sharing Policy publishes first findings of the Data Curation ARL offers first E-Science Final NIH Statement on Sharing NSF announces RFP for takes effect Profiles Project. doi:10.2218/ijdc.v4i3.117 Institute Research Data DataNet Project February, 2013 May, 2010 January, 2011 June 17, 2009 OSTP Policy Memorandum March 1, 2004 University of Virginia launches Top tier journals implement March 1, 2002 Digital Curation Centre Federal agencies with more Digital Curation Centre launched Scientific Data Consulting Joint Data Archiving Policy October, 2011 NIH NOT-OD-02-035 publishes Data Management Plan than $100 million in R&D in the United Kingdom Group Official Launch of DMP Tool Draft Statement on Content Checklist expenditures must make Sharing Research Data publications and digital data of federally funded research freely available to public. Southeastern Universities Additionally, digital data must be Research Association (SURA) accounted for and managed. DMPTool Partners ASERL only SURA only ASERL & SURA Clemson University Emory University George Mason University Georgia Institute of Technology March 2011 Georgia State University SURA Information Technology Meeting: James Madison University Johns Hopkins University Institutional Responses to North Carolina State University Old Dominion University NSF DMP Requirements Rice University Texas A&M University Tulane University Blue = ASERL + SURA Institutions University of Alabama Green = SURA Institutions University of Florida University of Kentucky NOTE: Did not include SURA member University of Miami University of Regina, SK Canada on this map. University of Memphis University of New Orleans University of North Carolina at Chapel Labeled locations = Universities with data Additional Institutions Consulted: management policies or documents consulted Hill Australian National Data Service University of Texas at Austin Monash University (AU) for this project. University of Virginia University of Cambridge (UK) Virginia Commonwealth University University of Edinburgh (UK) Virginia Polytechnic Institute & State University Digital Curation Centre (UK) Council on Government Relations (US) April 2011 ASERL Spring Membership Meeting Round-Robin discussion: January 2013 February 2012 Roles for Libraries in Digital Curation, ASERL & SURA membership June 2012 Data Policy Watch Management and Compliance with SURA February 6, 2013 endorse ‘Model Language November 2012 September 2012 website created for Writing of initial draft of Federal Requirements presentation. ASERL & SURA for Research Data ASERL membership October 2012 Draft sent to ASERL for review RDCC Policy Review Task Force Data Management Policy Official Announcement: Management Policies’ ‘endorsed in principle’ Draft revision after ASERL sends draft to language ‘Model Language for Research 1st feedback cycle members for review Data Management Policies’ February 2012 December 2012 April 2012 Formation of Draft revision after November 2012 Reviewers are ASERL members, select ASERL Research Data Formation of 3rd feedback cycle Draft revision after information technology, academic, Coordinating Committee (RDCC) ASERL-RDCC Data Policy 2nd feedback cycle legal, information security, librarian Working Group and information policy professionals. Draft Research Data Management Policy Language Process