Your SlideShare is downloading. ×
RDAP13 Cerys Willoughby: User Perspectives of Metadata Use in Electronic Noteboo…
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5
×

Thanks for flagging this SlideShare!

Oops! An error has occurred.

×

Introducing the official SlideShare app

Stunning, full-screen experience for iPhone and Android

Text the download link to your phone

Standard text messaging rates apply

RDAP13 Cerys Willoughby: User Perspectives of Metadata Use in Electronic Noteboo…

332
views

Published on

Cerys Willoughby, University of Southhampton …

Cerys Willoughby, University of Southhampton

Cerys Willoughby, Jeremy Frey, Emma Tonkin, Simon Coles and Colin Bird: “User Perspectives of Metadata Use in Electronic Notebooks”

Panel: Linked data and metadata (co-sponsored by the ASIS&T Digital Libraries SIG)
Research Data Access & Preservation Summit 2013
Baltimore, MD April 4, 2013 #rdap13


0 Comments
0 Likes
Statistics
Notes
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

No Downloads
Views
Total Views
332
On Slideshare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
1
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
5
Comments
0
Likes
0
Embeds 0
No embeds

Report content
Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
No notes for slide
  • Blog title (Project) Author Date of Post Title of Post URI (Location) Revision (Changes) Reason for change Date of Revision (Date of changes) File Type (Data)
  • Transcript

    • 1. https://www.asis.org/rdap/User Perspectives of Metadata Usein Electronic Laboratory Notebooks Cerys Willoughby, Jeremy Frey, Emma Tonkin, Simon Coles, and Colin Bird LastName, Title
    • 2. https://www.asis.org/rdap/Why do we care about metadata?
    • 3. https://www.asis.org/rdap/ Anatomy of an experiment• Plan experiment• Enact experiment• Analyse results
    • 4. https://www.asis.org/rdap/Traditional recording
    • 5. https://www.asis.org/rdap/ LabTrove andAutomaticcapture ofmetadataFlexibility has limitations..
    • 6. https://www.asis.org/rdap/LabTrove andUser defined metadata
    • 7. https://www.asis.org/rdap/What metadata might we expect?
    • 8. https://www.asis.org/rdap/Metadata Survey
    • 9. https://www.asis.org/rdap/Number of ‘sections’
    • 10. https://www.asis.org/rdap/ Values for section:• Types of subject: • Top ten subjects: – Experiment related – Materials – Project related – Methods – Blog related – Data – Experiments – Experiment stage – References – Samples – Instruments – Safety – Results
    • 11. https://www.asis.org/rdap/Number of ‘Key value’ pairs
    • 12. https://www.asis.org/rdap/ Values for Keys:• Types of subject: • Top ten subjects: – Experiment related – Materials – Project related – Instruments – Blog related – Methods – the post type – Post type – the location of an instrument – Data or experiment – Experiments – a reference to a physical lab – Samples notebook (Ref/code) – References – the date of the experiment – Location – the status of an activity or – Ref/code document
    • 13. https://www.asis.org/rdap/ LastName, Title
    • 14. https://www.asis.org/rdap/Number of Authors?
    • 15. https://www.asis.org/rdap/Public vs private?
    • 16. https://www.asis.org/rdap/ User perspectives on metadata• User interviews• User studies
    • 17. https://www.asis.org/rdap/What can we do about it?
    • 18. https://www.asis.org/rdap/Metadata is essential forintelligent open access