Technology for Work-Based Learning, 1 - Presentation Transcript
Technology for work-based learning
Simon Grant and Peter Rees Jones
JISC CETIS Conference
Aston, 2008-11-25
Building on present practice and supporting technology
Simon Grant
JISC CETIS Conference
Aston, 2008-11-25
Central topic
Not focusing on e-learning as e-learning
if the issues for work-based e-learning are just the same as for any other e-learning
but rather:
technology which supports learning in the workplace, and the relationship between learning and work, including relating the needs of employers and employees
start from current examples of work-related learning
potential, problems, issues, questions
Work as integral part of learning
Work is not usually an integral part of e.g. course
Work as integral part of learning includes
Work experience (part of school curriculum)
Placement (part of several degrees)
Year abroad (typically part of language degrees)
Explicit learning about work (addressed later)
Technology is uneven
Some e-portfolio provision
Is any technology support needed or wanted?
Do employers want to be involved?
Employer-led skills training
Training directly for the job, employer sponsored
Includes the widely adopted “Train to Gain”
http://www.traintogain.gov.uk/
Ordinary training courses from
commercial providers
HEIs/FEIs
may be at work, on campus, in training centre
Skills frameworks like SFIA may help identify need
What kind of systems currently exist to manage skills in the workplace?
Professional development
Facilitated and/or set out by professional bodies
Some professional bodies adopting e-portfolio tools
but what (if any) is the relationship to employers?
Are professional bodies interested in what matters to non-professional employers, and vice versa?
Some cases of integration?
health?
other recognised professions?
what else?
Self-motivated learning related to work
OU provides a good example
often related to work, though also often not
also does courses for employers
provides distance e-learning and portfolio tools
What is the difference between
self-motivated work-related learning
learning in the workplace including employer priorities?
What technology addresses the relationship between employers' interests and employees' interests, in learning education and training?
Learning based on experiences emerging from work
Action Learning
established for decades – see e.g. Wikipedia
Action Research
may have drawn on Action Learning, though not obviously
Inquiry-based learning
another variation on the same theme, and there are more
All these practices relate work and learning intimately
What technology is used to support these practices?
or could be used?
On-the-job employability
Increasingly, companies making large numbers redundant help them with their re-employability
Classic employability portfolio case in NL: NedCar
wanted to lay off thousands, then possibly take back later
However, probably not much learning involved
Should this be part of work-based learning model?
Employer engagement challenge
You can only engage employers by meeting their needs
They have some idea on skills gaps, training needs
The motive is there, Leitch or no Leitch
Professional bodies have an idea on CPD
HEIs have an idea on PDP
Individuals (learner-employees) have ambitions
How do we bring these together?
Can any established technology help?
What new technology is needed?
Discussion
Let's start with a round of introductory contributions
0 – 5 minutes on this central topic
clarification only at this stage
please make notes of questions to raise in discussion
Then go into open discussion
Hope to gather up round of new ideas
how my opinion has changed
what I have learned
We will try to summarise and feed back centrally
Discussion summary follows
Technology for work-based learning 1
Distinguish training from higher-level skills
abstract and conceptual knowledge – are they seen as valid?
APEL and other accreditation need streamlining
external regulations impose real drag – free up?
Evidence may come from surprising places
360 ° feedback important, and more
tick / check boxes not enough
approaches to assessment and evaluation
portfolio; peer; self (but accreditation of these?)
Get more requirements from industry and learners
e.g. could take account of talent management ideas
0 comments
Post a comment