#cetis12 badge session summary
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5
×
 

#cetis12 badge session summary

on

  • 958 views

 

Statistics

Views

Total Views
958
Views on SlideShare
957
Embed Views
1

Actions

Likes
1
Downloads
5
Comments
0

1 Embed 1

http://www.linkedin.com 1

Accessibility

Upload Details

Uploaded via as Adobe PDF

Usage Rights

CC Attribution License

Report content

Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
  • Full Name Full Name Comment goes here.
    Are you sure you want to
    Your message goes here
    Processing…
Post Comment
Edit your comment

#cetis12 badge session summary #cetis12 badge session summary Presentation Transcript

  • Are Open Badges the Future forRecognising Skills? facilitated by Phil Barker, Doug Belshaw, Simon Grant CETIS Conference, Nottingham 2012-02-23 1
  • Links to presentations  For Doug Belshaws slides, see  http://www.slideshare.net/dajbelshaw/are-open-badges-the-future-for-recognition-of-skills  For Simon Grants slides, see  http://www.slideshare.net/asimong/some-requirements-for-badge-systems  Session page with many more links  http://wiki.cetis.ac.uk/Are_open_badges_the_future_for_recognition_of_skills%3F 2
  • Scenario 1: formativeassessment in high-stakes field  strengths  weaknesses  continuous, expires if not  new therefore not trusted renewed  machine processable as well as human-readable  cumulative  opportunities  threats  works well with highly  perception of being trivial competitive students  unwelcome addition to  transfer between current systems institutions 3
  • Scenario 2: badges incommunities of practice  strengths  weaknesses  recognition by community  lack of context of practice  range, scope etc.  transferability to other  people unwilling to dig into communities detail offered  unclear governance  opportunities  proliferation  currency outside the community  threats  over-simplification  could include qualifications  brand recognition  branding opportunity dominates quality  invitation to examine  issuing by inappropriate evidence in detail bodies 4