2011 Sep CMMI Process Maturity Report
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5
×

Like this? Share it with your network

Share

2011 Sep CMMI Process Maturity Report

  • 1,278 views
Uploaded on

CMMI® for SCAMPISM Class A Appraisal Results 2011 Mid-Year Update

CMMI® for SCAMPISM Class A Appraisal Results 2011 Mid-Year Update

  • Full Name Full Name Comment goes here.
    Are you sure you want to
    Your message goes here
    Be the first to comment
    Be the first to like this
No Downloads

Views

Total Views
1,278
On Slideshare
1,275
From Embeds
3
Number of Embeds
2

Actions

Shares
Downloads
32
Comments
0
Likes
0

Embeds 3

http://www.linkedin.com 2
https://www.linkedin.com 1

Report content

Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
    No notes for slide

Transcript

  • 1. CMMI® forSCAMPISM Cl Class A A Appraisal R i l Results lt2011 Mid-Year UpdateSoftware Engineering InstituteCarnegie Mellon UniversityPittsburgh, PA 15213September 2011 CMMI-SCAMPI v1.2/v1.3 Class A Appraisal Results © 2011 Carnegie Mellon University 1 September 2011 © 2011 Carnegie Mellon University
  • 2. OutlineIntroductionCurrent StatusCommunity TrendsOrganizational TrendsSummary and Terms Used in this BriefingThis briefing is based solely on the appraisals reported to the SEI. It cannot be used as a source for an exact indicator of allorganizations in the world using CMMI models or appraisal methods nor can it be used for certification or verificationpurposes.The SEI does not certify appraisal results or organizations. The SEI licenses SEI Partners, authorizes/certifies leadappraisers, team leaders and high maturity lead appraisers to conduct appraisals. Neither the SEI nor any other organizationis a “certifying authority” of the results from a SCAMPI appraisal. Therefore requests to the SEI to provide information to beused for this purpose can not be fulfilled. Information provided by the SEI, such as this briefing, is to demonstrate reportedresults of the use of CMMI products and services only. CMMI-SCAMPI v1.2/v1.3 Class A Appraisal Results 2 September 2011 © 2011 Carnegie Mellon University
  • 3. Introduction - PurposeCharacterize the adoption of CMMIDescribe results from Standard CMMI Appraisal Method for ProcessImprovement (SCAMPISM) v1.2/v1.3 Class A appraisals using CapabilityMaturity Model® Integration (CMMI v1.2/ v1.3)** Organizations previously appraised against CMMI v1.0 /v1.1 and which have not reappraised against v1.2 or v1.3 are not included in this report.* SVC,ACQ appraisals are included in this report, P-CMM appraisals are not included in this report, CMMI-SCAMPI v1.2/v1.3 Class A Appraisal Results 3 September 2011 © 2011 Carnegie Mellon University
  • 4. Introduction - Briefing ContentsThis briefing includes three primary sections:1.1 Current Status • Snapshot of the development community based on the most recent appraisals, since SCAMPI V 1.2 release, of reporting organizations2. Community Trends • Global distribution of appraisals •G Growth in th number of appraisals performed th i the b f i l f d • Shifts in the maturity profile over time3.3 Organizational Trends • Time to move up in maturity based on change in maturity level and time between appraisals CMMI-SCAMPI v1.2/v1.3 Class A Appraisal Results 4 September 2011 © 2011 Carnegie Mellon University
  • 5. Process Maturity Profile by All Reporting Organizations 3600 3400 3200 3000 2800 65.4% ations 2600 2400Number of Organiza 2200 2000 1800 1600 1400 r 1200 23.4% 1000 800 600 400 4.0% 5.1% 200 0.5% 1.6% 0 Not Given Initial Managed Defined Quantitatively Optimizing Managed Based on most recent appraisal of 4220 organizations CMMI-SCAMPI v1.2/v1.3 Class A Appraisal Results 5 September 2011 © 2011 Carnegie Mellon University
  • 6. Process Maturity Profile (SVC Only) by All Reporting Organizations 50 40 nizationsNumb of Organ 30 51.0% ber 42.9% 20 10 6.1% 0 Not Given Managed Defined Based on most recent appraisal of 49 organizations CMMI-SCAMPI v1.2/v1.3 Class A Appraisal Results 6 September 2011 © 2011 Carnegie Mellon University
  • 7. Reporting Organization Categories Commercial/In-house 80.5% Contractor for Military/Government 15.8%Military/Government Agency 3.7% 0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 Number of Organizations gBased on 4220 organizations reporting an organization category CMMI-SCAMPI v1.2/v1.3 Class A Appraisal Results 7 September 2011 © 2011 Carnegie Mellon University
  • 8. Process Maturity Profile by Reporting Organization Categories 100% 90% Commercial/In-house = 3356 C i l/I h ations Within Category Contractor for Military/Government = 659 80% Military/Government Agency = 153 70% 61.7% 60% 58.3% 50% 43.1% 39.9%% of Organiza 40% 30% 27.6% 20.4% 20% 15.7% 10% 5.8% 3.5% 2.9% 4.6% 1.9% 2.6% 0.4% 0.2% 0.7% 0.3% 1.3% 0% Not Given Initial Managed Defined Quantitatively Optimizing Managed Based on most recent appraisal of 4168 organizations reporting an organization category CMMI-SCAMPI v1.2/v1.3 Class A Appraisal Results 8 September 2011 © 2011 Carnegie Mellon University
  • 9. Organization SizeBased on the total number of employees within the area of the organization that was appraised 1001 to 2000 501 to 1000 1.9% 2000+ 4.0% 4 0% 1.6% 1 6% 301 to 500 5.4% 25 or fewer 20.3% 201 to 300 201 to 2000+ 5.8% 18.6% 101 to 200 1 to 100 15.1% 15 1% 66.3% 66 3% 26 to 50 0 25.9% 76 to 100 7.6% 51 to 75 12.6% 12 6%Based on 4197 organizations reporting size data CMMI-SCAMPI v1.2/v1.3 Class A Appraisal Results 9 September 2011 © 2011 Carnegie Mellon University
  • 10. Organization Size (SVC Only)Based on the total number of employees within the area of the organization that was appraised 1001 to 2000 2000+ 2.0% 4.1% 501 to 1000 12.2% 12 2% 201 to 2000+ 32.7% 25 or f fewer301 to 500 49.0% 6.1% 201 to 300 1 to 100 8.2% 65.3% 101 to 200 2.0% 76 to 100 2.0% 51 to 75 4.1% 26 to 50 10.2%Based on 49 organizations reporting size data CMMI-SCAMPI v1.2/v1.3 Class A Appraisal Results 10 September 2011 © 2011 Carnegie Mellon University
  • 11. Maturity Profile by Organization Size Based on the total number of employees within the area of the organization that was appraised 100% 90%% of Organizations by Size 80% 72.4% 69.8% 68.5% 68.3% 68.1% 70% 61.5% 0.2% s 57.2% 60 6 54.5% 53.8% 60% 50% 40.7% 39.4% 40% % O 30% 23.1% 23.1% 22.5% 22.3% 20.2% 18.0% 17.2% 13.9% 20% 12.8% 11.1% 10.3% % 9.8% 1 7.4% 6.0% 5.8% 5.4% 5.3% 5.1% 4.7% 10% 4.1% 4.0% 3.5% 3.2% 3.0% 3.0% 2.6% 2.5% 2.2% 2.1% 1.5% 1.5% 1.1% 1.0% 0.9% 0.6% 0.6% 0.6% 0.5% 0.4% 0.4% 0.4% 0.4% 1.5% 0% 25 or fewer 26 to 50 51 to 75 76 to 100 101 to 200 201 to 300 301 to 500 501 to 1000 1001 to 2000 2000+ Not Given Initial Managed Defined Quantitatively Managed Optimizing Based on 4197 organizations reporting size data CMMI-SCAMPI v1.2/v1.3 Class A Appraisal Results 11 September 2011 © 2011 Carnegie Mellon University
  • 12. USA and Non-USAReporting Organization Categories 316 Commercial/In Commercial/In- house 3040 Contractor for 468 Military/Government 191 USA: 100% = 864 Non-USA: 100% = 3304 80 Military/Government Agency 73 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% % of Organizations CMMI-SCAMPI v1.2/v1.3 Class A Appraisal Results 12 September 2011 © 2011 Carnegie Mellon University
  • 13. Maturity Profile by All Reporting Organizations in the USA 100% 90% 80%% of Organizations 70% 60% 453 50% 40% 317 30% 20% 10% 56 41 1 2 0% Not Given Initial Managed Defined Quantitatively Optimizing g Managed Based on 870 organizations in the USA CMMI-SCAMPI v1.2/v1.3 Class A Appraisal Results 13 September 2011 © 2011 Carnegie Mellon University
  • 14. Maturity Profile by All Reporting Organizations based outside the USA 100% 90% 80% ations 2305 70%% of Organiza 60% 50% 40% 30% 672 20% 10% 176 111 67 19 0% Not Given Initial Managed Defined Quantitatively Optimizing Managed Based on 3350 organizations outside the USA CMMI-SCAMPI v1.2/v1.3 Class A Appraisal Results 14 September 2011 © 2011 Carnegie Mellon University
  • 15. Section 2—Community TrendsAppraisals are conducted through June 2011 and reported to the SEI byJuly 2011• 73 countries reporting appraisals – Most of the appraisals are from Asia and North America.• 4612 Appraisals posted on PARS – Expired appraisals are removed from PARS and replaced with the newest reappraisal result. CMMI-SCAMPI v1.2/v1.3 Class A Appraisal Results 15 September 2011 © 2011 Carnegie Mellon University
  • 16. Countries Where Appraisals Have Been Performed and Reported to the SEIArgentina Australia Austria Bahrain Bangladesh Belgium Brazil Brunei DarussalamBulgaria Canada Chile China Colombia Costa Rica Czech Republic DenmarkEgypt Finland France Germany Greece Guatemala Hong Kong HungaryIndia Indonesia Ireland Israel Italy Japan Jordan Korea, Korea Republic OfLatvia Lebanon Lithuania Luxembourg Macedonia Malaysia Mauritius MexicoMorocco Nepal Netherlands New Zealand Norway Pakistan Panama ParaguayPeru Philippines Poland Portugal Qatar Romania Russia Saudi ArabiaSingapore Slovakia South AfricaSpain Sri Lanka Sweden Switzerland TaiwanThailand Tunisia Turkey Ukraine United Arab E United Kingdom United States UruguayViet Nam Red country name: New additions with this reporting since March 2011 CMMI-SCAMPI v1.2/v1.3 Class A Appraisal Results 16 September 2011 © 2011 Carnegie Mellon University
  • 17. Number of Appraisals Reported to the SEI by Continent 4000 3500 ppraisals 3000 2660 2500 500 umber of Ap 2000 1500Nu 1244 1000 580 500 295 54 13 0 Africa Asia Australia Europe North America South America Based on 4846 appraisals North America includes Canada the USA and Mexico; South America includes Central America and the Canada, USA, Caribbean ; Australia includes New Zealand CMMI-SCAMPI v1.2/v1.3 Class A Appraisal Results 17 September 2011 © 2011 Carnegie Mellon University
  • 18. Number of Appraisals and Maturity LevelsReported to the SEI by Country Maturity Maturity Maturity Maturity Maturity Maturity Maturity Maturity Maturity Maturity Number of Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4 Level 5 Number of Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4 Level 5Country Appraisals Reported Reported Reported Reported Reported Country Appraisals Reported Reported Reported Reported ReportedArgentina 66 37 23 2 Malaysia 45 8 35 2Australia 11 3 3 Mauritius 10 or fewerAustria 10 or fewer Mexico 95 43 45 1 5Bahrain 10 or fewer Morocco 10 or fewerBangladesh 10 or fewer Nepal 10 or fewerBelgium 10 or fewer Netherlands 11 1 3 6Brazil 125 1 67 48 7 New Zealand 10 or fewerBrunei Darussalam 10 or fewer Norway 10 or fewerBulgaria 10 or fewer Pakistan 24 1 21 1 1Canada 30 1 9 12 3 Panama 10 or fewerChile 33 1 21 10 1 g y Paraguay 10 or fewerChina 1557 63 1409 43 35 Peru 18 10 7Colombia 40 1 15 8 3 5 Philippines 11 1 4 1 4Costa Rica 10 or fewer Poland 10 or fewerCzech Republic 10 or fewer Portugal 16 6 9 1Denmark 10 or fewer Qatar 10 or fewerEgypt 40 1 24 11 1 Romania 10 or fewerFinland 10 or fewer Russia 10 or fewerFrance 111 66 34 1 Saudi Arabia 11 2 6 1 1Germany 55 6 19 16 Singapore 14 4 8 1Greece 10 or fewer Slovakia 10 or fewerGuatemala 10 or fewer South Africa 10 or fewerHong Kong 10 or fewer Spain 186 1 106 62 2 4Hungary 10 or fewer Sri Lanka 15 2 13India 462 12 330 3 108 Sweden 10 or fewerIndonesia 10 or fewer Switzerland 10 or fewerIreland 10 or fewer Taiwan 98 1 42 50 4Israel 13 7 4 Thailand 38 12 25 1Italy 45 18 23 Tunisia 10 or fewerJapan 165 7 39 85 6 7 Turkey 22 19 3Jordan 10 or fewer Ukraine 10 or fewerKorea, Republic Of 128 49 59 10 4 United Arab Emirates 10 or fewerLatvia 10 or fewer United Kingdom 74 1 21 26 5Lebanon 10 or fewer United States 1119 5 417 550 3 60Lithuania 10 or fewer Uruguay g y 10 or fewerLuxembourg 10 or fewer Viet Nam 17 14 1 2Macedonia 10 or fewer CMMI-SCAMPI v1.2/v1.3 Class A Appraisal Results 18 September 2011 © 2011 Carnegie Mellon University
  • 19. Number of SCAMPI A Appraisals Reported to SEI by Year 1600 TOTAL 1375 1400 1349 POSTED ON PARs 1310 1299 raisals 1200 1004 mber of Appr 1000 941 800Num 600 556 551 542 509 400 200 11 0 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 Based on 4846 appraisals CMMI-SCAMPI v1.2/v1.3 Class A Appraisal Results 19 September 2011 © 2011 Carnegie Mellon University
  • 20. Trends in the Community Maturity Profile 100% 90% 2006 11 80% 2007 564 2008 zations 1516 65.4% 64.6% 70% 63.6% 62.9% 2009 2770 8.2% 2010 3,846% of Organiz 58 60% 2011 4,220 47.9% 50% 40% 31.4% 28.2% 27.3% 25.1% 23.4% 30% 23.8% 20% 9.4% 9.1% 9.0% 6.1% 5.1% 5.7% 10% 5.2% 5.1% 4.9% 4.0% 4.4% 1.6% 1.6% 0.5% 1.3% 1.2% 1.1% 1.0% 0.8% 0.5% 0.4% 0% Not Given Initial Managed Defined Quantitatively ManagedOptimizing Based on a cumulative view of the most recent appraisals of organizations up through the year indicated CMMI-SCAMPI v1.2/v1.3 Class A Appraisal Results 20 September 2011 © 2011 Carnegie Mellon University
  • 21. Time to Move Up 40Number of monthsto move to 75th Percentilenext maturity 30level 25.5 Median 21 19 20 25th Percentile 10 5 Time Period of Initial Appraisal 2006 to Present Level 1 to 2 2 to 3 3 to 4 3 to 5 Orgs 7 146 31 40 CMMI-SCAMPI v1.2/v1.3 Class A Appraisal Results 21 September 2011 © 2011 Carnegie Mellon University
  • 22. Summary -1Since 2006, 4846 SCAMPI v1.2/1.3 appraisals have been reported tothe SEI.Appraisals report from China, Spain, Brazil, Argentina, and India areincreasing at a rapid rate.More than 66% of appraised organizational units have 100 or feweremployees. The percentage is increasing steadily.The majority of reported appraisals are maturity level 2 and 3organizations.The number of appraisals in the USA and China represent more than55% of th t t l number of appraisals. f the total b f i lChina is now reporting more appraisals than USA CMMI-SCAMPI v1.2/v1.3 Class A Appraisal Results 22 September 2011 © 2011 Carnegie Mellon University
  • 23. Summary -2For organizations that began their CMMI-based SCAMPI effort with V1.2or later, the median time to move from• maturity level 2 to 3 is 19 months• maturity level 3 to 4 is 21 months• maturity level 3 to 5 is 25.5 months CMMI-SCAMPI v1.2/v1.3 Class A Appraisal Results 23 September 2011 © 2011 Carnegie Mellon University
  • 24. Terms Used in this ReportCompany - Parent of the appraised entity A company can be a commercial or non-commercial firm, for-profit or not for-profit business a research and development unit a higher education business, unit, unit, a government agency, or branch of service, etc.Organization - a.k.a. Appraised entity The organization unit to which the appraisal results apply. An appraised entity can be the entire company, a selected business unit, units supporting a particular product line or service, etc.Non-USA - Appraised entity whose geographic location is not within the United States. The parent of the appraised entity may or may not be based within the United States.PARS - Published Appraisal Results webpage contains CMMI® appraisals published at the request of the appraisal sponsor. The link is: http://sas.sei.cmu.edu/pars/ CMMI-SCAMPI v1.2/v1.3 Class A Appraisal Results 24 September 2011 © 2011 Carnegie Mellon University
  • 25. Contact InformationSEI Customer Relations (412) 268-5800 268 5800SEI FAX number (412) 268-5758Internet Address customer-relations@sei.cmu.edu @Mailing Address Customer Relations Software Engineering Institute Carnegie Mellon University Pittsburgh, PA 15213-3890 CMMI-SCAMPI v1.2/v1.3 Class A Appraisal Results 25 September 2011 © 2011 Carnegie Mellon University
  • 26. NO WARRANTYTHIS CARNEGIE MELLON UNIVERSITY AND SOFTWARE ENGINEERING INSTITUTEMATERIAL IS FURNISHED ON AN “AS-IS" BASIS CARNEGIE MELLON UNIVERSITY AS IS BASIS.MAKES NO WARRANTIES OF ANY KIND, EITHER EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED, AS TOANY MATTER INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, WARRANTY OF FITNESS FORPURPOSE OR MERCHANTABILITY, EXCLUSIVITY, OR RESULTS OBTAINED FROMUSE OF THE MATERIAL. CARNEGIE MELLON UNIVERSITY DOES NOT MAKE ANYWARRANTY OF ANY KIND WITH RESPECT TO FREEDOM FROM PATENT,TRADEMARK, OR COPYRIGHT INFRINGEMENT.Use of any trademarks in this presentation is not intended in any way to infringe on therights of the trademark holder holder.This Presentation may be reproduced in its entirety, without modification, and freelydistributed in written or electronic form without requesting formal permission. Permissionis required for any other use. Requests for permission should be directed to the SoftwareEngineering Institute at permission@sei.cmu.edu.This work was created in the performance of Federal Government Contract NumberFA8721-05-C-0003 with Carnegie Mellon University for the operation of the SoftwareEngineering Institute, a federally funded research and development center. TheGovernment of the United States has a royalty-free government-purpose license to use,duplicate, or disclose the work, in whole or in part and in any manner, and to have orpermit others to do so, for government purposes pursuant to the copyright license underthe clause at 252.227-7013. CMMI-SCAMPI v1.2/v1.3 Class A Appraisal Results 26 September 2011 © 2011 Carnegie Mellon University