Your SlideShare is downloading. ×
Wyoming State Bridge Profile
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5
×

Thanks for flagging this SlideShare!

Oops! An error has occurred.

×

Saving this for later?

Get the SlideShare app to save on your phone or tablet. Read anywhere, anytime - even offline.

Text the download link to your phone

Standard text messaging rates apply

Wyoming State Bridge Profile

110
views

Published on

Published in: Business

0 Comments
0 Likes
Statistics
Notes
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

No Downloads
Views
Total Views
110
On Slideshare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
2
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
6
Comments
0
Likes
0
Embeds 0
No embeds

Report content
Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
No notes for slide

Transcript

  • 1. © 2014 The American Road & Transportation Builders Association (ARTBA). All rights reserved. No part of this document may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise, without prior written permission of ARTBA. Highlights from FHWA’s 2013 National Bridge Inventory Data:  Of the 3,099 bridges in the state, 443 bridges, or 14% are classified as structurally deficient. This means one or more of the key bridge elements, such as the deck, superstructure or substructure, is considered to be in “poor” or worse condition.1  There are 280 bridges, or 9% of all state bridges, classified as functionally obsolete. This means the bridge does not meet design standards that are in line with current practice.  Federal-aid investment in Wyoming has supported $231.6 million in bridge construction spending on 646 bridges between 2003 and 2012, according to FHWA data.2  Since 2004, 222 new bridges have been constructed in the state and 23 bridges have undergone major reconstruction.  The state estimates that it would cost approximately $215.3 million to fix a total of 1,199 bridges in the state.3 Bridge Inventory: All Bridges Structurally deficient Bridges Type of Bridge Total Number Area (sq. meters) Daily Crossings Total Number Area (sq. meters) Daily Crossings Rural Bridges Interstate 765 340,970 3,022,034 94 48,828 315,258 Other principal arterial 337 169,840 815,973 35 24,336 124,290 Minor arterial 179 68,846 268,155 13 7,407 24,095 Major collector 319 121,802 263,895 30 13,284 35,297 Minor collector 215 70,208 197,506 22 8,450 16,322 Local 907 167,656 226,605 176 35,615 44,960 Urban Bridges Interstate 160 137,909 1,129,905 31 29,083 205,222 Other freeway 6 3,241 79,008 0 0 0 Principal arterial 77 91,179 748,442 15 25,495 172,623 Minor arterial 41 36,600 229,103 10 9,787 63,135 Collector 48 28,211 143,336 8 3,370 20,397 Local 45 13,651 49,613 9 2,336 3,360 Not classified 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total 3,099 1,250,112 7,173,575 443 207,990 1,024,959 1 According to the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), a bridge is classified as structurally deficient if the condition rating for the deck, superstructure, substructure or culvert and retaining walls is rated 4 or below or if the bridge receives an appraisal rating of 2 or less for structural condition or waterway adequacy. During inspections, the condition of a variety of bridge elements are rated on a scale of 0 (failed condition) to 9 (excellent condition). A rating of 4 is considered “poor” condition and the individual element displays signs of advanced section loss, deterioration, spalling or scour. 2 ARTBA analysis of FHWA data, includes all bridge construction related spending on projects approved by FHWA between 2003 and 2012. 3 This data is provided by bridge owners as part of the FHWA data and is required for any bridge eligible for the Highway Bridge Replacement and Rehabilitation Program. However, for some states this amount is very low and likely not an accurate reflection of current costs. State Bridge Profile Wyoming
  • 2. © 2014 The American Road & Transportation Builders Association (ARTBA). All rights reserved. No part of this document may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise, without prior written permission of ARTBA. Proposed bridge work: Type of Work Number Cost (millions) Daily Crossings Area (sq. meters) Bridge replacement 181 $130.6 175,312 57,959 Widening & rehabilitation 15 $3.5 15,792 5,987 Rehabilitation 50 $4.4 158,255 29,547 Deck rehabilitation/replacement 27 $7.4 123,417 16,405 Other work 926 $69.5 1,159,652 266,022 Top 10 Most Traveled Structurally Deficient Bridges in the State County Year Built Daily Crossings Type of Bridge Location (route/water under the bridge, traffic on the bridge and location) Teton 1969 30,409 Rural arterial FLAT CREEK, US 26, JACKSON Campbell 1975 20,582 Urban other principal arterial DONKEY CREEK, WYO 59, RENO JCT - GILLETTE Sheridan 1980 19,852 Urban other principal arterial LITTLE GOOSE CREEK, US 14, SHERIDAN Laramie 1977 18,571 Urban other principal arterial UP & BNRR, WYO 212, COLLEGE DRIVE;CHEYENNE Sweetwater 1991 18,307 Urban other principal arterial BITTER CREEK, US 30, ROCK SPRINGS Fremont 1978 17,043 Urban other principal arterial MIDDLE POPO AGIE RIVER, US 287, LANDER STREETS Sweetwater 1977 16,548 Urban minor arterial UPRR OVERPASS, WYO 376, ROCK SPRINGS CIRCUMFERENT Sweetwater 1977 16,548 Urban minor arterial BITTER CREEK, WYO 376, ROCK SPRINGS CIRCUMFERENT Sweetwater 1981 15,256 Urban other principal arterial BITTER CREEK, US 30, ROCK SPRINGS Natrona 1977 12,899 Urban other principal arterial CASPER CREEK, US 20, CASPER Sources: All data is from the 2013 National Bridge Inventory, released by the Federal Highway Administration in March 2014. Note that specific conditions on bridge may have changed as a result of recent work. Cost estimates of bridge work provided as part of the data and have been adjusted to 2013$ for inflation and estimated project costs. Contract awards data is for state and local government awards and comes from McGraw Hill. Note that additional bridge investment may be a part of other contract awards if a smaller bridge project is included with a highway project, and that would not be accounted for in the total in this profile.