Open Networks: Theoretical and Policy Lessons from the Internet Fran ç ois Bar
Modeling network change
1. Digital networks
Network configuration independent from physical layout
Control separable from ownership
2. Hypotheses
New network uses / innovation patterns
New network evolution dynamics
3. Evidence
Corporate networks
Electronic marketplaces
4. Implications
Understanding network transformation
Policy lessons
1. New network possibilities
Digital: bits, ubiquitous logic, and plentiful bandwidth
Programmable networks: network configuration written in software
A given network supports multiple communication patterns
Network control becomes flexibly separable from network ownership
Four broad media categories live delayed interpersonal mass
Media archetypes live delayed interpersonal mass telephone mail television newspaper
Distinct technical infrastructures live delayed interpersonal mass telephone mail television newspaper Switched network copper wires Packet switched trucks, planes, trains Broadcast network radio waves broadcast network print and deliver
Distinct actors live delayed interpersonal mass telephone mail television newspaper AT&T, RBOCs Publishers USPS FedEx, UPS CBS, ABC, NBC, Fox cable channels, cable networks
Distinct policy regimes live delayed interpersonal mass telephone mail television newspaper Common carriage Price regulation Universal service Free speech no prior restraint Common carriage Gov nt ownership License
live delayed interpersonal mass telephone mail television newspaper voice mail conference call answering machine
live delayed interpersonal mass telephone mail television newspaper telegram overnight delivery mass mailing
live delayed interpersonal mass telephone mail television newspaper targeted newsletters several editions per day
live delayed interpersonal mass telephone mail television newspaper many channels taped programs reruns
Internet as convergence live delayed interpersonal mass telephone mail television newspaper ip telephone email listserv web-cast
old distinctions become irrelevant live delayed interpersonal mass telephone mail television newspaper ip telephone email listserv web-cast web CU-seeme software updates
Characteristics of the new space? live delayed interpersonal mass
"Open" means:
Internet as software overlay on existing networks
multiple communication patterns , invented by (lead) users
Interconnection becomes key
Three-layer network model Applications Hardware Control
Control is flexibly separable Applications Hardware Control
Applications Hardware Control Applications Hardware Control Applications
Applications Hardware Control Applications Hardware Control Applications SBC AOL
Applications Hardware Control Applications Hardware Control Applications Earthlink
Applications Hardware Control Applications Hardware Control Applications Corp. LAN
Open networks' new possibilities
Multiple diverse physical networks can be interconnected
Multiple communication patterns can be overlaid on a given network
Network owners no longer are the only actors who can do that
Users can control and configure the network they use
New drivers of network evolution
2. Open networks: theoretical implications
Mechanisms driving network evolution
New ways to support and structure economic activities
Organizations
Markets
Hypotheses
Users –esp. Lead users– increasingly drive network innovation.
Iterative exploration process
Organizations and networks co-evolve
Network architecture matters
Various modes of intermediation yield different modes of innovation creation and diffusion
3. Evidence
Case studies / User Roundtables Including: Bank of America, HP, General Motors, Levi Strauss, Bechtel, Cisco, Quantum, Peoplesoft, Solectron, Silicon Graphics,…
Internal corporate networks
Inter-organizational networks
Electronic markets
Corporate Networks Evolution
Network evolution cycle: automation
use network to do old things in new ways
organization unchanged, new infrastructure deployed
network as tool
1. automate
Network evolution cycle: experimentation
without fundamentally changing the network infrastructure in place after the automation phase, experiment with new applications
marginal changes in organization and in network
network as lab (bricolage)
1. automate 2. experiment
Network evolution cycle: re-configuration
limits of the old network have been reached
organization and network change simultaneously
network articulates change
1. automate 2. experiment 3. re-organize
Network Evolution: start a new cycle
a new network has been deployed, upon which new tasks can now be automated
new network generation
1. automate 2. experiment 3. re-organize
A succession of cycles 1. automate 2. experiment 3. re-organize 5. experiment 6. re-organize 4. automate
A succession of cycles… made of smaller cycles 1. automate 2. experiment 3. re-organize 5. experiment 6. re-organize 4. automate
Key features of the network evolution cycle Iterative Cumulative End-user driven Structured learning Embedded knowledge Path-dependent 1. automate 2. experiment 3. re-organize
Co-evolution requires Network flexibility 1. automate 2. experiment 3. re-organize configuration flexibility application flexibility deploy a range of applications over a stable network configuration simultaneously - change network configuration to provide new applications and -invent new applications that t ake advantage of new configuration possibilities
Airline reservation systems automate experiment re-organize automate experiment re-organize automate experiment re-organize SABRE, closed system SABRE as open marketplace Internet direct sales, multiple marketplaces Orbitz, SABRE (travelocity) automate experiment re-organize
4. What this means
User-driven innovation is now a core driver of network change
E co nomic organization and net work infrastructure co- evolve (true at various levels of analysis: small groups, firm, firm clusters, markets, national economy)
0 comments
Post a comment