P57600 Lusas Presentation

  • 493 views
Uploaded on

 

  • Full Name Full Name Comment goes here.
    Are you sure you want to
    Your message goes here
    Be the first to comment
    Be the first to like this
No Downloads

Views

Total Views
493
On Slideshare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
1

Actions

Shares
Downloads
14
Comments
0
Likes
0

Embeds 0

No embeds

Report content

Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
    No notes for slide

Transcript

  • 1. COMPARISON OF THE LINEAR BUCKLING ANALYSIS FOR DIFFERENT THICKNESS OF A FLAT PLATEName : Muhammad bin RamlanMatrix No. : P 57600Subject : Finite Element Method In Civil EngineeringYear : 2011 / 2012Lecturer : Prof Ir Dr Wan Hamidon bin Wan Badaruzzaman
  • 2. Objective1. Analyse the effect of buckling load for a different thickness types of flat plate subjected to in-plane compressive loading.2. Discuss the result of the analysis prior to the experiment. COMPARISON OF THE LINEAR BUCKLING ANALYSIS FOR DIFFERENT THICKNESS OF A FLAT PLATE
  • 3. Problem DefinitionNo Item Plate 1 Plate 2 .1 Plate Size 2 m x 0.5 m 2 m x 0.5 m2 Plate Thickness 1 mm 5 mm3 Young Modulus 70E9 N/m2 70E9 N/m24 Poisson Ratio 0.3 0.35 Support Type Simply supported at all sides. Simply supported at all sides.6 Load 24N of in-plane compressive 24N of in-plane compressive load load is applied to one of the is applied to one of the short short edges, parallel to the long edges, parallel to the long sides. sides. COMPARISON OF THE LINEAR BUCKLING ANALYSIS FOR DIFFERENT THICKNESS OF A FLAT PLATE
  • 4. Description of LUSAS• LUSAS is a finite element analysis software program which can solve all types of linear and nonlinear stress, dynamics, composite and thermal engineering analysis problems. The main components of the LUSAS are: – LUSAS Modeller - a fully interactive graphical user interface for model building and viewing of results from an analysis. – LUSAS Solver - a powerful finite element analysis engine that carries out the analysis of the problem defined in LUSAS Modeller. COMPARISON OF THE LINEAR BUCKLING ANALYSIS FOR DIFFERENT THICKNESS OF A FLAT PLATE
  • 5. Finite Element Modelling• The finite element modelling using LUSAS was run as per below: – Creating a new model – Inserting the feature geometry – Select the meshing – Specifying the geometric properties – Specifying the material properties – Specifying the support applied – Select the loading applied to the element – Eigenvalue analyst control – Saving the model – Running the Analysis – Printing the buckling load factor – Calculating the critical buckling load COMPARISON OF THE LINEAR BUCKLING ANALYSIS FOR DIFFERENT THICKNESS OF A FLAT PLATE
  • 6. Result : Plate 1 (1mm thickness)• A Loading Distribution On Plate 1 COMPARISON OF THE LINEAR BUCKLING ANALYSIS FOR DIFFERENT THICKNESS OF A FLAT PLATE
  • 7. Result : Plate 1 (1mm thickness)• Deformed Mesh Layers On Plate 1 COMPARISON OF THE LINEAR BUCKLING ANALYSIS FOR DIFFERENT THICKNESS OF A FLAT PLATE
  • 8. Result : Plate 1 (1mm thickness)• Eigenvalue Result Value for Plate 1 COMPARISON OF THE LINEAR BUCKLING ANALYSIS FOR DIFFERENT THICKNESS OF A FLAT PLATE
  • 9. Result : Plate 2 (5mm thickness)• Loading Distribution On Plate 2 COMPARISON OF THE LINEAR BUCKLING ANALYSIS FOR DIFFERENT THICKNESS OF A FLAT PLATE
  • 10. Result : Plate 2 (5mm thickness)• Deformed Mesh Layers On Plate 2 COMPARISON OF THE LINEAR BUCKLING ANALYSIS FOR DIFFERENT THICKNESS OF A FLAT PLATE
  • 11. Result : Plate 2 (5mm thickness)• Eigenvalue Result Value for Plate 2 COMPARISON OF THE LINEAR BUCKLING ANALYSIS FOR DIFFERENT THICKNESS OF A FLAT PLATE
  • 12. Result : Overall Plate Compressive Mode Load Factor Buckling Load (N)thickness Load (N) 1 24 19.8891 477.34 1mm 2 24 21.1524 507.66 3 24 21.318 511.63 1 24 159.113 59667.36 5mm 2 24 169.234 63460.32 3 24 170.544 63954.00 COMPARISON OF THE LINEAR BUCKLING ANALYSIS FOR DIFFERENT THICKNESS OF A FLAT PLATE
  • 13. Conclusion1. It can be concluded that different types of material properties will cause different types of buckling effects.2. From the analysis, a thicker flat plate will provide a larger buckling value. Whilst for a thin flat plate, the buckling value will be smaller. COMPARISON OF THE LINEAR BUCKLING ANALYSIS FOR DIFFERENT THICKNESS OF A FLAT PLATE