The results of "Implementing Web 2.0 in the Classroom" - PETE&C 2009

Loading...

Flash Player 9 (or above) is needed to view presentations.
We have detected that you do not have it on your computer. To install it, go here.

0 comments

Post a comment

    Post a comment
    Embed Video
    Edit your comment Cancel

    6 Favorites & 1 Group

    The results of "Implementing Web 2.0 in the Classroom" - PETE&C 2009 - Presentation Transcript

    1. The Results of Web 2.0 in the Classroom PETE&C 2009 Monday, February 9 10:30-11:30 AM
      • Andy Petroski
      • Director of Learning Technologies
      • Assistant Professor of Learning Technologies
      • Harrisburg University
      Jim Gates Consultant Corporate Faculty, Harrisburg University
    2.  
    3. What is your role?
      • Administrator
      • Curriculum Specialist
      • Technology Director
      • Classroom Teacher
      • Other
    4. Where do you work?
      • School District
      • College/University
      • Intermediate Unit
      • Other
    5. Do you use Web 2.0 tools for personal use or professional development?
      • Yes
      • No
      Blog, Discussion Forum , Chat/IM Voice/Video Over IP , Social Bookmarking RSS Feed , Community Site , Wiki Google Docs, Media and Presentation
    6. At what stage are you?
      • Want to understand how Web 2.0 tools can improve teaching and learning
      • Want to begin implementing Web 2.0 in classes
      • Want to improve and expand how Web 2.0 tools are being used in classes
    7. What is the biggest obstacle to achieving your web 2.0 goal?
      • There is no obstacle
      • Selecting the right Web 2.0 tool(s) for the learning goal
      • Getting access/approval
      • Getting students to actively participate using the technology
      • Other
    8. What would you most like to take away from this session?
      • Information about Web 2.0 in general
      • Information from Web 2.0 implementation case studies
      • Web 2.0 tools that I can add to my Web 2.0 Toolbox
      • Other
    9.  
    10.  
    11.  
    12. 4 C’s of Web 2.0 (Bersin & Associates, 2008)
      • Wikis
      • Workspaces
      • Project / Process Support
      • Innovation / Idea Generation
      • Calendars & Events
      • User Profiles
      • Social Graphs
      • Friends/Contacts
      • People Matching
      • Buying/Selling
      • Content Creation
      • Content Sharing
      • Content Management
      • Tagging / Rating
      • Social Bookmarking
      • Syndication
      • Blogs
      • Forums
      • Micro-blogs / Life-streaming
      • Chat/IM
      • VOIP
      Collaboration Connections Content Conversations
    13. 4 C’s of Web 2.0 (Bersin & Associates, 2008)
      • pbwiki.com
      • docs.google.com
      • basecamphq.com
      • mindmeister.com
      • evite.com
      • linkedin.com
      • match.com
      • craigslist.org
      • language-exchanges.org/
      • splashup.com
      • slideshare.net
      • drupal.org
      • digg.com
      • bloglines.com
      • blogger.com
      • educationalist.org
      • plurk.com
      • paltalk.com
      • skype.com
      Collaboration Connections Content Conversations
    14. Web 2.0 F tprint
      • Monthly Google searches
      Articles in English on Wikipedia Views for the most viewed video on YouTube Hours of video uploaded to YouTube every minute Global blog readers Average blog posts in a 24 hour period Active Facebook users 9.9 Billion 2.5 Million 6.2 Million 13 Hours 346 Million 900,000 150 Million
    15. Web 2.0 F tprint Source: Pew Internet & American Life Project Teen/Parent Survey on Writing September-November 2007. Margin of error is +/- 5% 54% Send IM or text message to friends through the SNS system 54% Send a group message to all friends 66% Post comments to a friend’s blog 71% Send private messages within the SNS system 77% Post messages to a friends page 83% Add comments to a friend’s picture Social Networks and Daily Communication Choices % of teens who use the following features of SNS sites
    16. Web 2.0 F tprint 9 hours a week 59% talk about education-related topics 50% talk about school work
    17. Web 2.0 Impact
      • $4.6 Billion on Web 2.0 technologies by 2013
      • *Forrester Research
    18. Web 2.0 Impact Blogs 20.7% Wikis 7.7% COPs 12.3% 70.1% 60.6%
    19. Web 2.0 in Education Students Web 2.0 Effective Teaching & Learning Strategies Improved Learning Outcomes 21 st Century Skills Educators
    20. Web 2.0 in Education
      • Wikis
      • Workspaces
      • Project / Process Support
      • Innovation / Idea Generation
      • Calendars & Events
      • User Profiles
      • Social Graphs
      • Friends/Contacts
      • People Matching
      • Buying/Selling
      • Content Creation
      • Content Sharing
      • Content Management
      • Tagging / Rating
      • Social Bookmarking
      • Syndication
      • Blogs
      • Forums
      • Micro-blogs / Life-streaming
      • Chat/IM
      • VOIP
      Collaboration Connections Content Conversations
    21. Web 2.0 in Education Engagement . Authenticity . Feedback . Creativity . Critical Thinking Manual of Best Practices Coordinating Group Work Concept Maps World-wide Peer Review Media Presentations / Stories Electronic Collection of Work (e-portfolio) Class notes Access to subject matter experts in the classroom Connect with other students around the world Reflective writing Collaboration Connections Content Conversations
    22. LTMS 600
      • Students:
        • Wide range of technical skills
        • Wide range of classroom
        • experience
        • Ranged from teaching elementary to adults
        • Poor to Rich districts
        • Strict lockdown of machines vs open access
    23. LTMS 600
      • Format:
        • One week, two synchronous evening sessions and a Saturday
        • Moodle
        • Ning
        • On0Sync for synchronous
    24. LTMS 600
      • Activities
        • Created aggregator, subscribed to blogs
        • Discussion forums in Moodle
        • Created wikis
        • Explored many tools
        • Discussed impact of tools into lessons
    25. What type of Web 2.0 tool(s) did you implement in the classroom?
    26. What grade level do you teach?
    27. What were some obstacles to using Web 2.0 technology in the classroom?
    28. What solutions did you find to overcome any obstacles to using Web 2.0 technology in your classroom? go to administrators with a plan, try to integrate technology in small bites , focus on the educational value , patience & flexibility , prizes
    29. How did you benefit as a teacher from using Web 2.0 tools in the classroom ? connected, anywhere/anytime access to student work , less paper piles to carry , collaborate with students , learn something new everyday, able to challenge students more , motivated & inspired , engaged & responsible students , revitalized my teaching!
    30. What student learning benefits resulted from using Web 2.0 tools in the classroom?
    31. Do you plan to continue using Web 2.0 tools in your classroom? YES!
    32. Stories from the classroom
      • Challenges and solutions
        • It’s NOT about the TOOLS
        • Not mutually exclusive with NCLB
        • Don’t assume kids “know this stuff”
        • Notify parents
        • Some objections are unfounded
        • Learning new things is FUN
    33.  
    34.  
    35. conversations content connections Web 2.0 collaboration
      • Act 48 Information
      • Session Number: AH26
      • Session Title: The results of web 2.0 tools in the classroom
      • Act 48 Code:
    36. http:// www.wordle.net / Images of wordle.net, licensed by Creative Commons Original Source: Markus Angermeier Source: http://kosmar.de/wp-content/web20map.png Author: Luca Cremonini: http://www.railsonwave.it/railsonwave/2007/1/2/web-2-0-map
    37. Bersin & Associates http://www.bersin.com/ http://thefuturebuzz.com/2009/01/12/social-media-web-20-internet-numbers-stats/ & http://pages.citebite.com/h1b2e0o1p1lxy
    38. www.pewinternet.org/pdfs/PIP_Writing_Report_FINAL3.pdf http://www.allacademic.com//meta/p_mla_apa_research_citation/2/7/3/6/0/pages273605/p273605-1.php

    + Andy PetroskiAndy Petroski, 9 months ago

    custom

    846 views, 6 favs, 2 embeds more stats

    In the summer of 2008 Harrisburg University conduct more

    More info about this document

    © All Rights Reserved

    Go to text version

    • Total Views 846
      • 834 on SlideShare
      • 12 from embeds
    • Comments 0
    • Favorites 6
    • Downloads 0
    Most viewed embeds
    • 10 views on http://learnev.blogspot.com
    • 2 views on https://eportfolio.harrisburgu.net

    more

    All embeds
    • 10 views on http://learnev.blogspot.com
    • 2 views on https://eportfolio.harrisburgu.net

    less

    Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
    Flag as inappropriate

    Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate. If needed, use the feedback form to let us know more details.

    Cancel
    File a copyright complaint
    Having problems? Go to our helpdesk?

    Categories