Your SlideShare is downloading. ×
0
Anatomy of the New
Evidence-Rated AORN
Recommended Practices
Lisa Spruce, DNP, RN, ACNS, ACNP, ANP, CNOR

Dr. Spruce is the Director of Evidence Based Perioperative Practice
for AORN....
Sharon A. Van Wicklin, MSN, RN, CNOR, CRNFA, CPSN, PLNC
Sharon Van Wicklin has more than 36 years of experience as a perio...
Disclosure Information
Speakers:
Lisa Spruce, DNP, RN, ACNS, ACNP, ANP, CNOR
Director of Evidence-Based Practice, AORN
Sha...
Objectives
1. Discuss the history of evidence-based
practice.
2. Explain the PICO process for developing a
practice questi...
History of Evidence-Based
Practice (EBP)
Lisa Spruce, DNP, RN, ACNS, ACNP, ANP, CNOR
Director of Evidence-Based Practice, ...
History of EBP
“It isn’t what we don’t know that gives us
trouble, it’s what we know that ain’t so.”
~Will Rogers
In the beginning…
Thomas Beddoes (1760-1808)
• Called for sharing medical experiences,
collecting and archiving them and
-...
In the beginning…
Pierre Charles Alexander Louis (1787-1872)
– Performed the first chart review to disprove
the practice o...
1948
The first Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT)
• Medical Research Council Tuberculosis
Unit trial of streptomycin treatm...
Archie Cochran
Scottish physician
– "I knew that there was no real evidence that
anything we had to offer had any effect o...
1972
Effectiveness and Efficiency: Random
Reflections on Health Services published

Cardiff University Library, Cochrane A...
1979
Archie Cochrane states,
“It is surely a great criticism of our
profession that we have not organized a
critical summa...
History of EBP
1980’s• Oxford Database of Perinatal Trials

1992• Cochrane Center opened
1993• Cochrane Collaboration foun...
Evidence-Based Medicine
Term first used by McMasters University
(Canada)
• 1996-term formally defined by Sackett, et.al.
–...
Why EBP?
• It takes an average of 17 years to move
research to practice
• Evidence-based practice (EBP) provides
point of ...
Evidence-Based Nursing
Dicenso-1998
- “Process by which nurses make clinical
decisions using best available evidence,
clin...
First Nurse Pioneer for EBP
Florence Nightingale ~ 1860
• Compiled data from the Crimean war on
illness, treatment and cau...
EBP and Perioperative Nursing
• Quality of care
• Continuous inquiry

• Critical thinking
• Individualized care

• Payer a...
Developing the EBP Question
Lisa Spruce, DNP, RN, ACNS, ACNP, ANP, CNOR
Director of Evidence-Based Practice, AORN
PICO Method

P

I
C
O

Patient
Population
Problem
Interventions
-Education
-Self-care
-Best practices
Comparison
-Current ...
IM Injections: Aspirate or not?

P
I
C
O

Adult patients
Aspirate when giving
IM injection
No aspiration

Injury

Question...
Integrative Literature Review
• A simple inquiry leads to a
recommendation for practice!
- Crawford and Johnson-Integrativ...
Surgical Masks: Prevent SSI?

P

I
C
O

Patient
Population
Problem

Surgical patients

Interventions
-Education
-Self-care...
PICO Question
Among surgical patients, does wearing a
surgical mask prevent surgical site
infections compared to not weari...
Literature Search
Lisa Spruce, DNP, RN, ACNS, ACNP, ANP, CNOR
Director of Evidence-Based Practice, AORN
Sharon A. Van Wick...
Conducting a Search
Databases

Databases

~ Cochrane
~ AHRQ - NGC
~ Pubmed
~ CINAHL®
~ ANA - Medline
~ AORN Journal
~ Medi...
Search Strategies
Strategies

Results

• Define your topic
• Keywords
• Boolean operators

• No or few results

•
•
•
•

A...
Literature Search
Literature Search Terms
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–

Sterile field
Sterile technique
Aseptic technique
Aseptic practices
Surgi...
Literature Search
Initial search confined to 2006 to 2011
• Time restriction not considered in subsequent
searches
Literature Search
Documents searched
• Meta-analyses
• Randomized and nonrandomized controlled trials and
studies
• System...
Literature Search
Databases searched
•
•
•
•

MEDLINE®
CINAHL®
Scopus®
Cochrane
Literature Search
Articles identified:
– Rejected: 294
– Accepted: 135

429
Research Evidence
Sharon A. Van Wicklin, MSN, RN, CNOR, CRNFA, CPSN, PLNC
Perioperative Nursing Specialist, AORN
Research
Systematic Reviews
Randomized Controlled Trials
Quasi-Experimental Studies
Non-Experimental Studies
Qualitative S...
Research
Systematic Reviews
• Summarize evidence related to a particular
practice question
• Address strengths and limitat...
Research
Randomized Controlled Trials (RCTs)
• Randomization
- Researcher assigns subjects to a control or
experimental gr...
Research
RCTs
• Manipulation
- Researcher takes an action to influence some aspect
of the dependent variable
Independent v...
Research
RCTs
• Control
- Researcher introduces a group of subjects to which
the experimental intervention is not applied
Research
Quasi-Experimental
• Lack one element of a RCT
(ie, randomization, manipulation, or control)
- Researcher may att...
Research
Non-Experimental
• Study naturally occurring phenomenon
• No randomization, manipulation, or control
• Includes
•...
Research
Qualitative
• Data collection includes interviews, group
discussion, field observation, reflection
• Researchers ...
Non-Research Evidence
Sharon A. Van Wicklin, MSN, RN, CNOR, CRNFA, CPSN, PLNC
Perioperative Nursing Specialist, AORN
Non-Research
Clinical Practice Guidelines
Literature Reviews
Expert Opinion
Case Reports
Organizational Experience
Communi...
Non-Research
Clinical Practice Guidelines
• Systematically developed statements
• Provide guidance for clinical practice
Non-Research
Literature Review
• Summary of published literature without
systematic appraisal of the quality and
strength ...
Non-Research
Expert Opinion
• Expertise must be assessed
- Education
- Work experience
- University affiliations
- Publica...
Non-Research
Case Reports
• In-depth look at a single person, group, or
social unit
• Quantitative or qualitative
• Indivi...
Non-Research
Organizational Experience
• Generally the result of efforts to improve
quality of care delivery and outcomes ...
Non-Research

Community Standard/Clinician Experience
Evidence Appraisal
Sharon A. Van Wicklin, MSN, RN, CNOR, CRNFA, CPSN, PLNC
Perioperative Nursing Specialist, AORN
AORN Appraisal Tools
Research

Non-Research
AORN Appraisal Tools
Research

The strength of the
research evidence is
indicated by I, II, or III
AORN Appraisal Tools
Research

The quality of the
research evidence is
indicated by A, B, or C
AORN Appraisal Tools
Research

The final Research
appraisal score is a
combination of I, II, or III
and A, B, or C
AORN Appraisal Tools
Non-Research

The strength of the nonresearch evidence is
indicated by IV or V
AORN Appraisal Tools
Non-Research

The quality of the nonresearch evidence is
indicated by A, B, or C
AORN Appraisal Tools
Non-Research

The final Non-Research
appraisal score is a
combination of IV or V
and A, B, or C
Appraisal Score
Evidence Rating
Sharon A. Van Wicklin, MSN, RN, CNOR, CRNFA, CPSN, PLNC
Perioperative Nursing Specialist, AORN
AORN Evidence Rating Model
Appraisal Score
Research
Non-Research

IA

IB
IIA, IIB
IIIA, IIIB

IVA
Regulatory

IVB
VA, VB

...
AORN Evidence Rating Model
1:
1:

IA

Strong Evidence
Regulatory requirement

IVA
Regulatory

1: Strong Evidence
1: Regula...
AORN Evidence Rating Model
2:
IB
IIA, IIB
IIIA, IIIB

3:
IC
IIC
IIIC

Moderate Evidence
IVB
VA, VB

2: Moderate Evidence

...
AORN Evidence Rating Model
4:
No requirement

Benefits Balanced with Harms
No requirement

4: Benefits Balanced With Harms...
AORN Evidence Rating Model
4:
No requirement

5:
No requirement

Benefits Balanced with Harms
No requirement

4: Benefits ...
Evidence Rating

[3: Limited Evidence]
Appraisal Score
Evidence Rating

[3: Limited Evidence]
Meeting National Guidelines
Clearinghouse Criteria
Lisa Spruce, DNP, RN, ACNS, ACNP, ANP, CNOR
Director of Evidence-Based ...
Meeting NGC Criteria
• Documentation will need to be provided
showing that the guideline is based upon
a systematic review...
Anatomy of an AORN
Recommended Practice
Lisa Spruce, DNP, RN, ACNS, ACNP, ANP, CNOR
Director of Evidence-Based Practice, A...
AORN Evidence Rated RP
Recommendation Number: IV
Recommendation
Rationale
Intervention Letter: IV.a.
Intervention
Supporti...
AORN Evidence Rated RP
AORN Evidence Rated RP
AORN
Evidence
Rated RP
Questions and Answers
References
1. Goodman, K. (2002). Ethics and Evidence-based Medicine. Cambridge
University Press.
2. Crofton, J. (2006). T...
Contact Hours
You must complete the Learner Evaluation online
to earn the 1.0 nursing contact hour.
Registered for this we...
Contact Hours
You must complete the Learner Evaluation online
to earn the 1.0 nursing contact hour.
Not Registered for thi...
Get Your 2014 Edition Today
Perioperative Standards and Recommended Practices
This comprehensive publication provides the ...
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5
×

Anatomy of the New Evidence-Rated AORN Recommended Practices

3,811

Published on

This presentation is from an AORN webinar that helps guide perioperative team members through the evidence appraisal and rating process using the AORN appraisal tools and evidence-rating model. The webinar replay is available for free at http://bit.ly/1i9r4En. Get the 2014 edition of Perioperative Standards and Recommended Practices at http://bit.ly/1bJmXAT.

Published in: Health & Medicine
0 Comments
3 Likes
Statistics
Notes
  • Be the first to comment

No Downloads
Views
Total Views
3,811
On Slideshare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
3
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
26
Comments
0
Likes
3
Embeds 0
No embeds

No notes for slide

Transcript of "Anatomy of the New Evidence-Rated AORN Recommended Practices"

  1. 1. Anatomy of the New Evidence-Rated AORN Recommended Practices
  2. 2. Lisa Spruce, DNP, RN, ACNS, ACNP, ANP, CNOR Dr. Spruce is the Director of Evidence Based Perioperative Practice for AORN. Prior to coming to AORN she was the Clinical Manager of Surgical Services for Universal Health Services where she managed all clinical practice for 25 perioperative departments throughout the U. S. She was instrumental in bringing evidence based practice changes to the Universal Health Care System. Dr. Spruce was a Clinical Nurse Specialist in the Perioperative Departments for 5 hospitals in Las Vegas and a Nurse Practitioner in private practice in Florida. She was a circulating nurse in the OR for 6 years and worked in pre-op, PACU, and in the Endoscopy Suite. She is a board certified Acute Care Nurse Practitioner, Adult Clinical Nurse Specialist and as a CNOR. She has published several articles in the AORN Journal and the Journal for the American Academy of Nurse Practitioners.
  3. 3. Sharon A. Van Wicklin, MSN, RN, CNOR, CRNFA, CPSN, PLNC Sharon Van Wicklin has more than 36 years of experience as a perioperative nurse. She has worked in all facets of the operating room environment from scrub person to supervisor. Sharon received her BSN and MSN from Middle Tennessee State University. She is a member of Phi Kappa Phi, and the Sigma Theta Tau Honor Society of Nursing. Sharon holds certification in operating room nursing (CNOR), as an RN first assistant (CRNFA), in plastic and reconstructive surgical nursing (CPSN), and as a legal nurse consultant (PLNC). In her previous role as a perioperative educator, Sharon was responsible for the creation and coordination of educational projects, programs and inservices designed to improve hospital processes for orientation and development of personnel in nine perioperative departments. Her work as a legal expert witness involves reading and reviewing medical records and testifying as to the standard of perioperative nursing care. Sharon is a member of the School of Nursing faculty of Middle Tennessee State University and the University of Phoenix. She truly enjoys her work as a nursing instructor helping to shape the hearts and minds of future perioperative nursing professionals. In her position as a Perioperative Nursing Specialist for the Association of periOperative Registered Nurses (AORN), Sharon provides consultative services, authors various AORN publications including recommended practices and Clinical Issues columns; and, represents AORN at various organizations and functions such as AAMI, IAHCSMM, and AATB. Sharon was recognized by AORN as a recipient of the Outstanding Achievement in the Application of Perioperative Clinical Research Award in 2005. This award recognizes a registered nurse whose application of perioperative clinical research reflects the goal of excellence in patient care.
  4. 4. Disclosure Information Speakers: Lisa Spruce, DNP, RN, ACNS, ACNP, ANP, CNOR Director of Evidence-Based Practice, AORN Sharon A. Van Wicklin, MSN, RN, CNOR, CRNFA, CPSN, PLNC Perioperative Nursing Specialist, AORN Disclose no conflicts Planning Committee: Ellice Mellinger, MS, RN, CNOR Perioperative Education Specialist, AORN Discloses no conflict AORN’s policy is that the subject matter experts for this product must disclose any financial relationship in a company providing grant funds and/or a company whose product(s) may be discussed or used during the educational activity. Financial disclosure will include the name of the company and/or product and the type of financial relationship, and includes relationships that are in place at the time of the activity or were in place in the 12 months preceding the activity. Disclosures for this activity are indicated according to the following numeric categories: 1. Consultant/Speaker’s Bureau 2. Employee 3. Stockholder 4. Product Designer 5. Grant/Research Support 6. Other relationship (specify) 7. Has no financial interest Accreditation Statement AORN is accredited as a provider of continuing nursing education by the American Nurses Credentialing Center's Commission on Accreditation. AORN is provider-approved by the California Board of Registered Nursing, Provider Number CEP 13019. AORN IS PLEASED TO PROVIDE THIS WEBINAR ON THIS IMPORTANT TOPIC. HOWEVER, THE VIEWS EXPRESSED IN THIS WEBINAR ARE THOSE OF THE PRESENTERS AND DO NOT NECESSARILY REPRESENT THE VIEWS OF, AND SHOULD NOT BE ATTRIBUTED TO AORN.
  5. 5. Objectives 1. Discuss the history of evidence-based practice. 2. Explain the PICO process for developing a practice question. 3. Identify research and non-research evidence. 4. Describe the evidence appraisal process using the AORN Evidence Appraisal Tools. 5. Describe the evidence rating process using the AORN Evidence Rating Model.
  6. 6. History of Evidence-Based Practice (EBP) Lisa Spruce, DNP, RN, ACNS, ACNP, ANP, CNOR Director of Evidence-Based Practice, AORN
  7. 7. History of EBP “It isn’t what we don’t know that gives us trouble, it’s what we know that ain’t so.” ~Will Rogers
  8. 8. In the beginning… Thomas Beddoes (1760-1808) • Called for sharing medical experiences, collecting and archiving them and - Analyzing - Reporting - Publishing
  9. 9. In the beginning… Pierre Charles Alexander Louis (1787-1872) – Performed the first chart review to disprove the practice of blood-letting – Medical science moved from innocence to awareness – 20th Century-arrival of the randomized controlled trial
  10. 10. 1948 The first Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT) • Medical Research Council Tuberculosis Unit trial of streptomycin treatment for pulmonary tuberculosis
  11. 11. Archie Cochran Scottish physician – "I knew that there was no real evidence that anything we had to offer had any effect on tuberculosis, and I was afraid that I shortened the lives of some of my friends by unnecessary intervention."
  12. 12. 1972 Effectiveness and Efficiency: Random Reflections on Health Services published Cardiff University Library, Cochrane Archive, University Hospital, Llandough
  13. 13. 1979 Archie Cochrane states, “It is surely a great criticism of our profession that we have not organized a critical summary, by specialty or subspecialty, adapted periodically, of all relevant randomized controlled trials.”
  14. 14. History of EBP 1980’s• Oxford Database of Perinatal Trials 1992• Cochrane Center opened 1993• Cochrane Collaboration founded
  15. 15. Evidence-Based Medicine Term first used by McMasters University (Canada) • 1996-term formally defined by Sackett, et.al. – “A systematic approach to analyze published research as the basis of clinical decision making.”
  16. 16. Why EBP? • It takes an average of 17 years to move research to practice • Evidence-based practice (EBP) provides point of care clinicians tools needed to improve care • EBP transforms health care based on one clinician, one encounter at a time
  17. 17. Evidence-Based Nursing Dicenso-1998 - “Process by which nurses make clinical decisions using best available evidence, clinical expertise and patient preferences in the context of available resources.”
  18. 18. First Nurse Pioneer for EBP Florence Nightingale ~ 1860 • Compiled data from the Crimean war on illness, treatment and cause of death • Called for the collection of statistics on hospital outcomes • Improved sanitary conditions based on evidence
  19. 19. EBP and Perioperative Nursing • Quality of care • Continuous inquiry • Critical thinking • Individualized care • Payer and regulatory pressure • Savvy patients
  20. 20. Developing the EBP Question Lisa Spruce, DNP, RN, ACNS, ACNP, ANP, CNOR Director of Evidence-Based Practice, AORN
  21. 21. PICO Method P I C O Patient Population Problem Interventions -Education -Self-care -Best practices Comparison -Current practice -Another intervention Outcome
  22. 22. IM Injections: Aspirate or not? P I C O Adult patients Aspirate when giving IM injection No aspiration Injury Question: Among adult patients, does aspirating while giving an IM injection cause injury compared to no aspiration?
  23. 23. Integrative Literature Review • A simple inquiry leads to a recommendation for practice! - Crawford and Johnson-Integrative lit review reveals that there is no data to support the use of the aspiration procedure
  24. 24. Surgical Masks: Prevent SSI? P I C O Patient Population Problem Surgical patients Interventions -Education -Self-care -Best practices Wearing a mask Comparison -Current practice No mask -Another intervention Outcome Surgical site infections
  25. 25. PICO Question Among surgical patients, does wearing a surgical mask prevent surgical site infections compared to not wearing a mask?
  26. 26. Literature Search Lisa Spruce, DNP, RN, ACNS, ACNP, ANP, CNOR Director of Evidence-Based Practice, AORN Sharon A. Van Wicklin, MSN, RN, CNOR, CRNFA, CPSN, PLNC Perioperative Nursing Specialist, AORN
  27. 27. Conducting a Search Databases Databases ~ Cochrane ~ AHRQ - NGC ~ Pubmed ~ CINAHL® ~ ANA - Medline ~ AORN Journal ~ Medical Library ~ Google Scholar ~ Joanna Briggs ~ Virginia Henderson International Nursing Library ~ Embase
  28. 28. Search Strategies Strategies Results • Define your topic • Keywords • Boolean operators • No or few results • • • • AND OR Quotation marks Truncation • Avoid long phrases or questions • Choose different key words
  29. 29. Literature Search
  30. 30. Literature Search Terms – – – – – – – – – – – – Sterile field Sterile technique Aseptic technique Aseptic practices Surgical drapes Double-gloving Assisted gloving Closed gloving Time-related sterilization Event-related sterilization Surgical attire Protective clothing - Sterile supplies - Sterile barriers - Barrier precautions - Body-exhaust suits - Laminar air flow - Bowel technique - Glove expansion - Glove perforation - Strikethrough - Spaulding’s criteria - Product packaging - Equipment contamination
  31. 31. Literature Search Initial search confined to 2006 to 2011 • Time restriction not considered in subsequent searches
  32. 32. Literature Search Documents searched • Meta-analyses • Randomized and nonrandomized controlled trials and studies • Systematic and nonsystematic reviews • Opinion documents and letters • Guidelines (eg, government, professional, standards) • Additional (eg, articles from reference lists) • Alerts
  33. 33. Literature Search Databases searched • • • • MEDLINE® CINAHL® Scopus® Cochrane
  34. 34. Literature Search Articles identified: – Rejected: 294 – Accepted: 135 429
  35. 35. Research Evidence Sharon A. Van Wicklin, MSN, RN, CNOR, CRNFA, CPSN, PLNC Perioperative Nursing Specialist, AORN
  36. 36. Research Systematic Reviews Randomized Controlled Trials Quasi-Experimental Studies Non-Experimental Studies Qualitative Studies
  37. 37. Research Systematic Reviews • Summarize evidence related to a particular practice question • Address strengths and limitations of included studies • Review multiple studies • Utilize rigorous search strategies and precise appraisal methods
  38. 38. Research Randomized Controlled Trials (RCTs) • Randomization - Researcher assigns subjects to a control or experimental group on a random basis - Increases validity of the study
  39. 39. Research RCTs • Manipulation - Researcher takes an action to influence some aspect of the dependent variable Independent variable: Dependent variable: Intervention being applied Phenomenon being studied
  40. 40. Research RCTs • Control - Researcher introduces a group of subjects to which the experimental intervention is not applied
  41. 41. Research Quasi-Experimental • Lack one element of a RCT (ie, randomization, manipulation, or control) - Researcher may attempt to compensate by using multiple groups, or multiple measures
  42. 42. Research Non-Experimental • Study naturally occurring phenomenon • No randomization, manipulation, or control • Includes • descriptive (describe observable facts), • comparative (compare observable facts), and • correlational (show a relationship) studies. • Most of nursing research falls into this category
  43. 43. Research Qualitative • Data collection includes interviews, group discussion, field observation, reflection • Researchers attempt to explore issues, answer questions and gain in-depth understanding of certain phenomena by summarizing, analyzing and interpreting data
  44. 44. Non-Research Evidence Sharon A. Van Wicklin, MSN, RN, CNOR, CRNFA, CPSN, PLNC Perioperative Nursing Specialist, AORN
  45. 45. Non-Research Clinical Practice Guidelines Literature Reviews Expert Opinion Case Reports Organizational Experience Community Standard/Clinician Experience
  46. 46. Non-Research Clinical Practice Guidelines • Systematically developed statements • Provide guidance for clinical practice
  47. 47. Non-Research Literature Review • Summary of published literature without systematic appraisal of the quality and strength of the evidence • May not summarize all available evidence on the topic in question
  48. 48. Non-Research Expert Opinion • Expertise must be assessed - Education - Work experience - University affiliations - Publications - Citations - Recognized speaker
  49. 49. Non-Research Case Reports • In-depth look at a single person, group, or social unit • Quantitative or qualitative • Individual case or multiple cases • Provide insight but have limited generalizability
  50. 50. Non-Research Organizational Experience • Generally the result of efforts to improve quality of care delivery and outcomes within a particular organization • May not be generalizable beyond the organization
  51. 51. Non-Research Community Standard/Clinician Experience
  52. 52. Evidence Appraisal Sharon A. Van Wicklin, MSN, RN, CNOR, CRNFA, CPSN, PLNC Perioperative Nursing Specialist, AORN
  53. 53. AORN Appraisal Tools Research Non-Research
  54. 54. AORN Appraisal Tools Research The strength of the research evidence is indicated by I, II, or III
  55. 55. AORN Appraisal Tools Research The quality of the research evidence is indicated by A, B, or C
  56. 56. AORN Appraisal Tools Research The final Research appraisal score is a combination of I, II, or III and A, B, or C
  57. 57. AORN Appraisal Tools Non-Research The strength of the nonresearch evidence is indicated by IV or V
  58. 58. AORN Appraisal Tools Non-Research The quality of the nonresearch evidence is indicated by A, B, or C
  59. 59. AORN Appraisal Tools Non-Research The final Non-Research appraisal score is a combination of IV or V and A, B, or C
  60. 60. Appraisal Score
  61. 61. Evidence Rating Sharon A. Van Wicklin, MSN, RN, CNOR, CRNFA, CPSN, PLNC Perioperative Nursing Specialist, AORN
  62. 62. AORN Evidence Rating Model Appraisal Score Research Non-Research IA IB IIA, IIB IIIA, IIIB IVA Regulatory IVB VA, VB Evidence Rating Evidence Requirements 1: Strong Evidence 1: Regulatory requirement Interventions or activities for which effectiveness has been demonstrated by strong evidence from rigorously-designed studies, meta-analyses, or systematic reviews, rigorously-developed clinical practice guidelines, or regulatory requirements.  Evidence from a meta-analysis or systematic review of research studies that incorporated evidence appraisal and synthesis of the evidence in the analysis.  Supportive evidence from a single well-conducted randomized controlled trial.  Guidelines that are developed by a panel of experts, that derive from an explicit literature search methodology, and include evidence appraisal and synthesis of the evidence. 2: Moderate Evidence Interventions or activities for which the evidence is less well established than for those listed under “1: Strong Evidence.”  Supportive evidence from a well-conducted research study.  Guidelines developed by a panel of experts which are primarily based on the evidence but not supported by evidence appraisal and synthesis of the evidence.  Non-research evidence with consistent results and fairly definitive conclusions. 3: Limited Evidence Interventions or activities for which there are currently insufficient evidence or evidence of inadequate quality.  Supportive evidence from a poorly conducted research study.  Evidence from non-experimental studies with high potential for bias.  Guidelines developed largely by consensus or expert opinion.  Non-research evidence with insufficient evidence or inconsistent results.  Conflicting evidence, but where the preponderance of the evidence supports the recommendation. IC IIC IIIC IVC VC No requirement No requirement 4: Benefits Balanced With Harms Selected interventions or activities for which the AORN Recommended Practices Advisory Board (RPAB) is of the opinion that the desirable effects of following this recommendation outweigh the harms. No requirement No requirement 5: No Evidence Interventions or activities for which no supportive evidence was found during the literature search completed for the recommendation.  Consensus opinion.
  63. 63. AORN Evidence Rating Model 1: 1: IA Strong Evidence Regulatory requirement IVA Regulatory 1: Strong Evidence 1: Regulatory requirement Interventions or activities for which effectiveness has been demonstrated by strong evidence from rigorously-designed studies, meta-analyses, or systematic reviews, rigorously-developed clinical practice guidelines, or regulatory requirements.  Evidence from a meta-analysis or systematic review of research studies that incorporated evidence appraisal and synthesis of the evidence in the analysis.  Supportive evidence from a single well-conducted randomized controlled trial.  Guidelines that are developed by a panel of experts, that derive from an explicit literature search methodology, and include evidence appraisal and synthesis of the evidence.
  64. 64. AORN Evidence Rating Model 2: IB IIA, IIB IIIA, IIIB 3: IC IIC IIIC Moderate Evidence IVB VA, VB 2: Moderate Evidence Interventions or activities for which the evidence is less well established than for those listed under “1: Strong Evidence.”  Supportive evidence from a well-conducted research study.  Guidelines developed by a panel of experts which are primarily based on the evidence but not supported by evidence appraisal and synthesis of the evidence.  Non-research evidence with consistent results and fairly definitive conclusions. Limited Evidence IVC VC 3: Limited Evidence Interventions or activities for which there are currently insufficient evidence or evidence of inadequate quality.  Supportive evidence from a poorly conducted research study.  Evidence from non-experimental studies with high potential for bias.  Guidelines developed largely by consensus or expert opinion.  Non-research evidence with insufficient evidence or inconsistent results.  Conflicting evidence, but where the preponderance of the evidence supports the recommendation.
  65. 65. AORN Evidence Rating Model 4: No requirement Benefits Balanced with Harms No requirement 4: Benefits Balanced With Harms Selected interventions or activities for which the AORN Recommended Practices Advisory Board (RPAB) is of the opinion that the desirable effects of following this recommendation outweigh the harms. V.c. Sterile supplies should be opened for only one patient at a time in the OR or other procedure room. [4: Benefits Balanced with Harms]
  66. 66. AORN Evidence Rating Model 4: No requirement 5: No requirement Benefits Balanced with Harms No requirement 4: Benefits Balanced With Harms Selected interventions or activities for which the AORN Recommended Practices Advisory Board (RPAB) is of the opinion that the desirable effects of following this recommendation outweigh the harms. No Evidence No requirement 5: No Evidence Interventions or activities for which no supportive evidence was found during the literature search completed for the recommendation.  Consensus opinion.
  67. 67. Evidence Rating [3: Limited Evidence]
  68. 68. Appraisal Score
  69. 69. Evidence Rating [3: Limited Evidence]
  70. 70. Meeting National Guidelines Clearinghouse Criteria Lisa Spruce, DNP, RN, ACNS, ACNP, ANP, CNOR Director of Evidence-Based Practice, AORN
  71. 71. Meeting NGC Criteria • Documentation will need to be provided showing that the guideline is based upon a systematic review of the evidence. • Documentation must contain an assessment of the benefits and harms of the recommended care and alternative care options.
  72. 72. Anatomy of an AORN Recommended Practice Lisa Spruce, DNP, RN, ACNS, ACNP, ANP, CNOR Director of Evidence-Based Practice, AORN
  73. 73. AORN Evidence Rated RP Recommendation Number: IV Recommendation Rationale Intervention Letter: IV.a. Intervention Supporting Evidence Activity Number: IV.a.1. Activity Evidence Rating Appraisal Scores
  74. 74. AORN Evidence Rated RP
  75. 75. AORN Evidence Rated RP
  76. 76. AORN Evidence Rated RP
  77. 77. Questions and Answers
  78. 78. References 1. Goodman, K. (2002). Ethics and Evidence-based Medicine. Cambridge University Press. 2. Crofton, J. (2006). The MRC randomized trial of streptomycin and its legacy: A view from the clinical front line. Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, 99(10), 531-534. 3. Archie Cochrane: The name behind the cochrane collaboration, cochrane.org/about-us/history/archie-cochrane. 4. Claridge, J. A. &Fabian, T. C. (2005). History and development of evidencebased medicine. World Journal of Surgery, 29(5), 547-543. 5. DiCensor A, Cullum N & Ciliska D (1998) Implementing evidence-based nursing: some misconceptions. Evidence Based Nursing, 38–40. 6. Crawford, C. L. & Johnson, J. A. (2012). To aspirate or not: An integrative review of the literature. Nursing, 20-25. 7. Recommended practices for sterile technique. In: Perioperative Standards and Recommended Practices. Denver, CO: AORN, Inc; 2012:e62-e90. 8. Dearholt S, Dang D. Johns Hopkins Nursing Evidence-Based Practice: Model and Guidelines. 2nd ed. 2012. 9. OR NurseLink-A perioperative community. AORN. http://www.ornurselink.org/Pages/home.aspx
  79. 79. Contact Hours You must complete the Learner Evaluation online to earn the 1.0 nursing contact hour. Registered for this webinar? Complete the evaluation by using the link in your purchase confirmation e-mail or by visiting the AORN website: o Visit www.aorn.org and login using your AORN Web Login. o Navigate to My AORN and select “Manage Your Education”. o Earn your Contact Hour by selecting and completing the appropriate webinar evaluation. Once you have submitted your evaluation, you can print your certificate immediately, or you can visit MY AORN > View All Contact Hours > select the session > click Print Your Certificate at any time.
  80. 80. Contact Hours You must complete the Learner Evaluation online to earn the 1.0 nursing contact hour. Not Registered for this Webinar? Follow the below instructions to obtain access to the evaluation: – – – – – Visit www.aorn.org and login using your AORN Web Login. Go to the Product Catalog > Search by name of the webinar or other key word >Select the webinar you just attended that has ‘EVAL’ under it. Follow the shopping cart instructions to complete your transaction. You will then receive an e-mail containing a link to the online evaluation. You may complete the evaluation by using the link in the purchase confirmation e-mail or by visiting the AORN website: www.aorn.org > Navigate to My AORN > select “Manage Your Education”. Once you have submitted your evaluation, you can print your certificate immediately, or you can visit MY AORN > View All Contact Hours > select the session > click Print Your Certificate at any time. If you have any questions or require assistance, please contact AORN Customer Service at (800) 755-2676 or custsvc@aorn.org.
  81. 81. Get Your 2014 Edition Today Perioperative Standards and Recommended Practices This comprehensive publication provides the evidence-based recommended practices for both patient and worker safety in all settings where operative and other invasive procedures are performed. New evidence-rated recommended practices include: • • • • Pneumatic Tourniquet-assisted Procedures Environmental Cleaning Packaging Systems for Sterilization Sharps Safety Updated from 2013 edition: • Prevention of Transmissible Infections • Safe Environment of Care • Sterile Technique • Sterilization www.aorn.org/RecommendedPractices
  1. A particular slide catching your eye?

    Clipping is a handy way to collect important slides you want to go back to later.

×