Your SlideShare is downloading. ×
  • Like
Europeana @ NISO Bibliographic Roadmap Meeting
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5
×

Thanks for flagging this SlideShare!

Oops! An error has occurred.

×

Now you can save presentations on your phone or tablet

Available for both IPhone and Android

Text the download link to your phone

Standard text messaging rates apply

Europeana @ NISO Bibliographic Roadmap Meeting

  • 659 views
Published

Presentation for NISO Bibliographic Roadmap Meeting …

Presentation for NISO Bibliographic Roadmap Meeting
http://www.niso.org/topics/tl/BibliographicRoadmap/

Published in Technology , Education
  • Full Name Full Name Comment goes here.
    Are you sure you want to
    Your message goes here
    Be the first to comment
    Be the first to like this
No Downloads

Views

Total Views
659
On SlideShare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
0

Actions

Shares
Downloads
4
Comments
0
Likes
0

Embeds 0

No embeds

Report content

Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
    No notes for slide

Transcript

  • 1. Antoine IsaacNISO Bibliographic Roadmap MeetingBaltimore, April 16, 2013
  • 2. Europeana.eu, Europe’s cultural heritage portalAudiovisualcollectionsNationalAggregatorsRegionalAggregatorsArchivesThematiccollectionsLibraries26M objects from 2,200 European galleries, museums, archives and libraries
  • 3. What types of objects does Europeana gives access to?Text Image Video Sound 3D
  • 4. From a flat interoperability formatMandatory:dc:title or dc:descriptionOne of dc:coverage, dc:subject, dc:typedcterms:spatialeuropeana:type with value of TEXT, IMAGE,VIDEO, SOUND or 3Ddc:language for objects with edm:type valueof TEXT.europeana:rights with controlled values(Public Domain, CC-BY, etc)europeana:isShownAt oreuropeana:isShownByeuropeana:dataProvidereuropeana:providerOthers:dc:contributor, dc:creator, dc:date, dc:format,dc:identifier, dc:language, dc:publisher,dc:relation, dc:source, dcterms:alternative,dcterms:extent, dcterms:temporal,dcterms:medium, dcterms:created,dcterms:provenance, dcterms:issued,dcterms:conformsTo, dcterms:hasFormat,dcterms:isFormatOf, dcterms:hasVersion,dcterms:isVersionOf, dcterms:hasPart,dcterms:isPartOf, dcterms:isReferencedBy,dcterms:references, dcterms:isReplacedBy,dcterms:replaces dcterms:isRequiredBy,dcterms:requires dcterms:tableOfContentseuropeana:object
  • 5. To a more complex data model - EDMProperties for skos:Concept http://www.mimo-db.eu/InstrumentsKeywords/4378EDM properties Corresponding values in the original dataskos:PrefLabel xml:lang="en" BuccinProperties for skos:Concept http://www.mimo-db.eu/HornbostelAndSachs/356EDM properties Corresponding values in the original dataskos:PrefLabel xml:lang="en" 423.22 Labrosones with slidesProperties for edm:Place http://sws.geonames.org/3017382/EDM properties Corresponding values in the original dataskos:PrefLabel xml:lang="en" Francehttp://pro.europeana.eu/edm-documentation
  • 6. Better accomodate domain practicesMuseums , e.g. ATHENA aggregatorCRM – LIDOArchives – e.g. APEnetEADLibraries – e.g. The European LibraryMARCWorkshops were organized with experts during EDM designRunning « data watch » effort with partner projects, task forces
  • 7. Keep in touch with friendsRe-use of existing standardsCoordinate model development with other projectsDomain-specific projects (CARARE – archaeology)Similar initiatives to Europeana (DPLA)Having a data model that is in principle flexible and re-uses a lotof stuff helps
  • 8. Easy vs. hard requirements for EDM1. Distinguish the real object from its digital representation2. Distinguish the object from its metadata record3. Allow multiple records for same objectcontaining potentially contradictory statements about an object1. Support for objects that are composed of other objects2. Be compatible with different levels of descriptionGeneric/interoperable vs. specific/domain-centered1. Flexible support for describing contextual resources, including concepts2. Re-use and extend elements from existing standardsMain obstacle is maybe lack of agreed practice
  • 9. Challenge #1: getting good data, still!Providers contributing richer and interoperable data in EDMEnrichmentEuropeana and third-parties?Validation (open world) and quality measuresVersioning and persistence of living Europeana data
  • 10. Challenge #2: interoperability, still!Data in• Mapping EDM to what Europeana providers want or can use• Sharing patternsData out• Identifying data consumer needs• Different channels with their own flavors / levels of complexityE.g. Schema.org
  • 11. Challenge #3: opening data, still!The Europeana network is doing very good A licensing framework for metadata and content Pushing openness across the boardThere will always be interesting corner-cases Some institutions regard metadata as content User-generated data (annotations) could raise issues
  • 12. Challenge #4: measuring valueAn old friend, too
  • 13. Many challenges are old foes, in factCf. W3C Library Linked Data reporthttp://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/lld/XGR-lld/
  • 14. Thank you