Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5




image recognition theory implications law policy augmented reality

image recognition theory implications law policy augmented reality



Total Views
Views on SlideShare
Embed Views



1 Embed 1 1



Upload Details

Uploaded via as Adobe PDF

Usage Rights

© All Rights Reserved

Report content

Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

  • Full Name Full Name Comment goes here.
    Are you sure you want to
    Your message goes here
Post Comment
Edit your comment

Pechakucha Pechakucha Presentation Transcript

  • Visual Image Search and Physical Hyperlinks
  • project #1: • Two years ago Paige fell in love. • With a barcode. • QRCodes; a low-fi version of physical hyperlinks
  • Physical Hyperlinks • Physical hyperlink is a neologism that refers to extending the Internet to objects and locations in the real world. • Physical hyperlinking does this by attaching urls to tangible objects or locations.
  • for example
  • • if you can decorate the world with an encoded semiotics - what do you say? • graffiti? criticism? warnings? advertise? outboard memory palaces?
  • • The QRCode acts as a visual semiotic language extending and connecting between things and the internet • What else can do that?
  • project #2: visual search
  • How does it work? • same basic idea as the qrcode project except only now there is no code • We take a photograph of something and find similar images using robot vision techniques • Like a barcode we get back context
  • Such as... • Criticism and praise • Author, description, • History, Medium, era, • Similar looking images • Where to get more • Your longitude,latitude
  • Locative uses • bookmarking places • knowing where your friends are or were • knowing where you are • a landscape like australian song lines
  • Entering mainstream • Tonchidot • Photosynth • Tineye • Spellbinder • Snaptell
  • Implications? • Images used to be mute; how does this alter our relationship, interpretation and construction of images? • Will images supplant words as a way of talking to computers? To each other? • For example see
  • Legal freight trains • If most peoples reality is mediated by a consensual interpretation - one not favorable to brands - how will brand owners respond?
  • And who owns our (augmented) reality?
  • Code is law • Copyright owners may over-eagerly scour the web looking for theft - reducing everybody elses vocabulary. • Having a power doesn’t mean we should always use it.
  • finding a balance • How do we avoid being overzealous one way or the other? • How can we protect free speech? • How do we protect fair use?
  • Our thoughts • Foster an open image commons • Like Wikipedia • Associates images with meta-data • Protects common interest • Prevents undue private control
  • Building it • Add photographs • Document them • Creative Commons Licensing • Let anybody (not just Google) handle search requests
  • • Become conscious of your images
  • Thanks • • • •