Wearable HCI Talk for U of R
•Download as PPTX, PDF•
1 like•599 views
Wearable HCI talk for University of Rochester HCI class.
Recommended
Recommended
More Related Content
What's hot
What's hot (20)
Viewers also liked
Viewers also liked (10)
Similar to Wearable HCI Talk for U of R
Similar to Wearable HCI Talk for U of R (20)
Recently uploaded
Recently uploaded (20)
Wearable HCI Talk for U of R
- 1. Wearable Computing: HCI Challenges and Opportunities Daniel Ashbrook Assistant Professor, RIT http://danielashbrook.com
- 2. PhD Computer Science 2009 MS Computer Science 2005 BS Computer Science 2001
- 4. 4 2014–
- 6. WHAT IS A WEARABLE COMPUTER?
- 7. CHARACTERISTICS • Always ready • Senses & reacts; can act proactively • Communication tool • Respects wearer’s attention • Intimate & personal
- 9. HISTORY OF WEARABLE COMPUTING
- 15. THE FIRST WEARABLE COMPUTER Ed Thorpe & Claude Shannon 1966
- 16. HP CALCULATOR WATCH 1977
- 18. MIT BORGS 1993
- 19. EARLY 2000s Symbol barcode scanner ⬅ Xybernaut MA-V
- 21. SMART WATCHES Ruputer: 1998–2006 WristPDA: 2003–2005
- 22. IBM COMMERCIAL
- 23. RECENT WATCHES 2013 2012 2010
- 24. TODAY
- 25. WHAT IS A WEARABLE COMPUTER?
- 26. WHAT IS A WEARABLE COMPUTER FOR?
- 27. BENEFITS Superpower enhancements Sensing Proactive action Instant interaction
- 28. SUPERPOWERS Better! Faster! Stronger! Enhanced memory! Instant knowledge!
- 29. SENSING
- 32. BENEFITS COSTS Superpower enhancements Sensing Proactive action Instant interaction Ergonomics Attention Social weight
- 33. COSTS Erogonomics Attention Social weight
- 34. ERGONOMICS • Fit • Size • Weight • Materials • Storage & access • Graspability • Robustness • sweat • water • impacts • connectors • wires
- 35. ERGONOMICS HEAT WEIGHT POWER vs functionality form factor battery life
- 36. ATTENTION
- 37. ATTENTION
- 38. ATTENTION
- 39. ATTENTION
- 40. ATTENTION Scarlett Johansson Jared Leto
- 41. SOCIAL WEIGHT SW = CL + PP + SC CL → cognitive load PP → physical presence SC → social convention Source:A. Toney, B. Mulley, B. H. Thomas, and W. Piekarski, “Social weight: designing to minimise the social consequences arising from technology use by the mobile professional,”
- 42. SOCIAL WEIGHT Cognitive Load Physical Presence Social Convention CL: • PP: • SC: • CL: ••• PP: •• SC: • CL: •••••• PP: ••• SC: ••
- 43. CL: ••• PP: ••• SC: ••• CL: ••• PP: •••• SC: ••••• CL: ? PP: •••••••••• SC: •••••••••••••••••••• SOCIAL WEIGHT Cognitive Load Physical Presence Social Convention
- 44. WEARABLE INTERACTION INPUT & OUTPUT
- 45. BENEFITS COSTS Superpower enhancements Sensing Proactive action Instant interaction Ergonomics Attention Social weight
- 48. WHY INPUT? INPUT TEXT ACT REACT Compose a message Enter data (phone number, web address) Take a photo Check calendar Share something React now: phone call React eventually: text message
- 49. TEXT INPUT
- 50. TEXT INPUT
- 53. VISUAL OUTPUT
- 54. AUDIO OUTPUT
- 55. HAPTIC OUTPUT 57
- 56. WEARABLE INTERACTION MY WORK
- 57. BENEFITS COSTS Superpower enhancements Sensing Proactive action Instant interaction Ergonomics Attention Social weight
- 58. Ergonomics Attention Social weight Fast subtle interaction
- 59. Nenya: Subtle and Eyes- Free Mobile Input with a Magnetically-Tracked Finger Ring Daniel Ashbrook, Patrick Baudisch, Sean White Proceedings of CHI 2011
- 62. N S
- 63. 69
- 64. 73 BitWear: A Platform for Small, Connected, Interactive Devices. Kent Lyons, David H. Nguyen, Shigeyuki Seko, Sean White, Daniel Ashbrook, Halley Profita.
- 65. 1-bit input 1-bit output
- 68. design language pairing & authentication end-user programming
- 70. CHALLENGES Integration with other platforms & devices Discoverability of functionality How many wearables/person? Turning it off and showing that state: e.g. Glass vs Autographer
- 71. CURRENT WORK New interfaces for wearable computing Augmented digital fabrication Studying barriers to & motivations for "making"
- 72. Thank you! danielashbrook.com Now recruiting PhD students: http://tinyurl.com/rit-hci-phd
Editor's Notes
- I am a maker! I love to build things. Sometimes hardware, sometimes software, usually a mixture of both. (photos of things I’ve made)
- is glass a wearable computer? is fitbit? why/why not?
- 1200s: eyeglasses
- Also 1500s, a German mechanical pedometer
- ancient chinese abacus ring
- Chatelaine, 1600s–1800s
- possibly first wristwatch ever. 1868.
- Thorp & Shannon, 1966. Roulette wearable.
- 1977: HP calculator watch
- Walkman—1979 Notice 2 headphone ports. Shared wearability.
- MIT wearable computing group, ~1993
- Early 200s: Xybernaut, IBM linux watch, Symbol barcode scanner Not much commercialized
- Lots of research!
- Ruputer—1998–2006 SPOT watch—2004–2008 WristPDA—2003–2005
- IBM wearable commercial 2000
- Sony watch (2010), Motorola watch (2012), Pebble (2013)
- 2013: Google Glass 2013: Samsung Galaxy Gear
- answered this...
- enhance your abilities: vision, hearing, memory(!)
- enhance your abilities: vision, hearing, memory(!)
- wearable to learn stuff about you—QS movement also context sensing for personal assistance
- personalized, autonomous, sense the environment & act on your behalf: communication filtering; turn off phone ringer; google now!
- Larry page: “reduce time between intention and action”
- enhance your abilities: vision, hearing, memory(!)
- people don’t like wearing things. benefits must greatly outweigh irritation of wearing + charging + social
- Lots of places we can wear things! However, we want to wear things that are comfortable.
- not paying attention can be dangerous… in multiple ways
- not paying attention can be dangerous… in multiple ways
- example: wrist devices: social convention good; physical presence low; varying cognitive load
- example: wrist devices: social convention good; physical presence low; varying cognitive load
- enhance your abilities: vision, hearing, memory(!)
- Direct, touch, gesture, speech
- I address all three costs!
- I address all three costs! Two examples before I end.
- Researchers have tried to make ideas real, but they usually are like this.
- simple ring to enable simple interactions
- use ring for selection, fast access
- short demo
- Sensor in existing box; called “baselet”. Can see magnetic field change, and associated trace, as ring rotates.
- Really responsive, high-resolution
- goal: can this really be usable?
- scenario is something like this—selecting items from a list determine user ability to select targets how many targets possible?
- user studies: how many targets; visual feedback? results what does this tell us? what’s the bigger picture?
- one bit I/O + connectivity
- one set of questions
- one set of questions
- what is the application? logging / quick interaction / long interaction / really long interaction
- networking, integration, discoverability of functions, how many wearables will people use at once, switching off, connectivity vs battery life wrt keeping my data in the cloud vs local (thick vs thin)
- Wearable fashion: can be goofy, but is actually staggeringly important for real devices.