Your SlideShare is downloading. ×
Alert Whats New For Anesthesia Pratices In 2010
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5
×

Thanks for flagging this SlideShare!

Oops! An error has occurred.

×

Introducing the official SlideShare app

Stunning, full-screen experience for iPhone and Android

Text the download link to your phone

Standard text messaging rates apply

Alert Whats New For Anesthesia Pratices In 2010

1,260
views

Published on


0 Comments
0 Likes
Statistics
Notes
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

No Downloads
Views
Total Views
1,260
On Slideshare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
0
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
0
Comments
0
Likes
0
Embeds 0
No embeds

Report content
Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
No notes for slide

Transcript

  • 1. What's New for Anesthesia Practices in 2010 January 4, 2010 I would like to take a moment to wish everyone a Happy New Year and personally thank you for making ABC's practice management Alert the most widely read weekly newsletter in the anesthesia community in 2009. It was our goal, and it remains our goal, to help make anesthesiology the best informed of all specialties on practice management and health policy issues There will be many more changes for anesthesia practices in this new year than we can report here. We are looking forward to keeping you up to date with 51 more Alerts in 2010. We open with the following items: 1. Fifteen-day hold on Medicare claims, January 1- January 15 2. Reporting inpatient visits now that Medicare has eliminated the consultation codes; 3. Clarification of the requirements for pre- and postanesthesia visits. 1. Fifteen-day hold on claims. Expect your Medicare carrier to hold all claims for services provided from January 1st through January 15th (ten business days). The reason for this hold, which CMS announced through its physician listserv on December 21, 2009, was to avoid the need for retrospective payment adjustments if Congress were to fix the 21.2% cut announced in the Federal Register in November. Of course, by the time the listserv subscribers were notified of the hold, the 21.2% cut had already been put off until March 1, 2010 by the defense appropriations bill passed by the Senate on December 19. Since the carriers have 15 calendar days to pay clean claims in any event, the hold is not likely to have much impact. If, for some reason such as a change in its geographic adjuster, a practice submits charges that are less than the 2010 allowed amount, it will have to resubmit the claims in order to be paid at the correct level. 2. Reporting inpatient visits without the consultation codes. Effective January 1, 2010, CMS started denying claims for consultations using the CPT consultation codes, which the Agency no longer recognizes. The consultation codes consist of 99241-99244 for office or other outpatient consults and 99251-
  • 2. 99255 for inpatient consultations. Instead of the consultation codes, CMS has instructed physicians to bill using the new or established patient visit codes. In the inpatient hospital setting, all physicians (and qualified nonphysicians where permitted) who perform an initial evaluation and management(E/M) may bill the initial hospital care codes (99221 – 99223). An anesthesiologist does not need to be the admitting or primary physician in order to bill an initial E/M service. There is a new modifier, “-AI” for the “principal physician of record.” Follow-up visits in the facility setting should continue to be billed as subsequent hospital care visits (99231 – 99233). Documenting the request from the referring physician is not required when using the inpatient E/M codes. The MLN Matters article (MM6740) states: Conventional medical practice is that physicians making a referral and physicians accepting a referral would document the request to provide an evaluation for the patient. In order to promote proper coordination of care, these physicians should continue to follow appropriate medical documentation standards and communicate the results of an evaluation to the requesting physician. This is not to be confused with the specific documentation requirements that previously applied to the use of the consultation codes. Commercial carriers do not have to follow CMS’ lead in withdrawing recognition from the consultation codes. The vast majority of these carriers have not issued any guidance on the matter. Some payer contracts may contain language that automatically applies any new Medicare payment policy to anesthesiologists’ claims. If your practice bills for consultations on a regular basis, you may want to check any payer contracts that could follow Medicare changes this closely. If the patient's primary insurance still accepts consultation codes and their secondary insurance is Medicare, you may bill the service in either of two ways: (1) bill the primary payer an E/M code that is appropriate for the service, and then report the amount actually paid by the primary payer, along with the same E/M code, to Medicare for determination of whether a payment is due; or (2) bill the primary payer using a consultation code that is appropriate for the service, and then report the amount actually paid by the primary payer, along with an E/M code that is appropriate for the service, to Medicare for determination of whether a payment is due. The American Medical Association has asked CMS to delay the consultation policy for a year. CMS has not acted on the request. 3. Clarification of the requirements for pre- and postanesthesia visits. According to new “Interpretive Guidelines” from CMS, the pre-anesthesia visit must be performed “within 48 hours prior to any inpatient or outpatient surgery or
  • 3. procedure requiring anesthesia services. The delivery of the first dose of medication(s) for the purpose of inducing anesthesia . . . marks the end of the 48 hour timeframe.” The pre-anesthesia visit, remember, is not a full H&P or even medical clearance for surgery (as opposed to anesthesia) and the physician may still report an E/M service if s/he documents the elements of the selected code. The Interpretive Guidelines are are not intended to affect billing for Medicare Part B services. Rather, they are instructions to the surveyors who assess hospitals’ compliance with the Medicare Part A Conditions of Participation. They can be found in Appendix A to the State Operations Manual. (The Manual posted on the CMS website has not yet been updated to include the December 11, 2009 revisions, which we are posting on our own website for your convenience.) The surveyors may be employees of the State agency that accredits healthcare facilities, or they may be physicians contracted by The Joint Commission to perform accreditation surveys under TJC’s “deemed” authority. Both State agency and TJC surveyors must ensure that the hospitals meet the Conditions of Participation as spelled out in the relevant federal regulations (42 C.F.R. § 482.52 for anesthesia services) and in Appendix A’s Interpretive Guidelines and Survey Procedures. As revised in December 2009, effective immediately, the pre-anesthesia evaluation of the patient should include, “at a minimum:”  Review of the medical history, including anesthesia, drug and allergy history;  Interview and examination of the patient;  Notation of anesthesia risk according to established standards of practice (e.g. ASA classification of risk);  Identification of potential anesthesia problems, particularly those that may suggest potential complications or contraindications to the planned procedure (e.g., difficult airway, ongoing infection, limited intravascular access);  Additional pre-anesthesia evaluation, if applicable and as required in accordance with standard practice prior to administering anesthesia (e.g., stress tests, additional specialist consultation); and  Development of the plan for the patient’s anesthesia care, including the type of medications for induction, maintenance and post-operative care and discussion with the patient (or patient’s representative) of the risks and benefits of the delivery of anesthesia. Requirements for the postanesthesia visit have also been modified in the new Interpretive Guidelines. Over the years many anesthesiologists have asked whether it is acceptable to perform the postanesthesia visit in the PACU. The regulation, §482.52(b)(3), provides only that a postanesthesia evaluation must be completed and documented “no later than 48 hours after surgery or a procedure
  • 4. requiring anesthesia services.” Many consultants including ASA staff have answered that as long as the postanesthesia visit occurs after anesthesia time has ended, it may be performed in the PACU. The Interpretive Guidelines have now clarified the applicable principles. The postanesthesia evaluation may be conducted in the PACU as long as the patient is sufficiently recovered to participate purposefully in the assessment: The calculation of the 48-hour timeframe begins at the point the patient is moved into the designated recovery area. Except in cases where post- operative sedation is necessary for the optimum medical care of the patient (e.g., ICU), the evaluation generally would not be performed immediately at the point of movement from the operative area to the designated recovery area. Accepted standards of anesthesia care indicate that the evaluation may not begin until the patient is sufficiently recovered from the acute administration of the anesthesia so as to participate in the evaluation, e.g., answer questions appropriately, perform simple tasks, etc. The evaluation can occur in the PACU/ICU or other designated recovery location. For outpatients, the post-anesthesia evaluation must be completed prior to the patient’s discharge. The elements of an adequate post-anesthesia evaluation should be clearly documented and conform to current standards of anesthesia care, including:  Respiratory function, including respiratory rate, airway patency, and oxygen saturation;  Cardiovascular function, including pulse rate and blood pressure;  Mental status;  Temperature;  Pain;  Nausea and vomiting; and  Postoperative hydration. Depending on the specific surgery or procedure performed, additional types of monitoring and assessment may be necessary. There are other items of interest in the Revised Hospital Anesthesia Services Interpretive Guidelines, notably a definition of “immediately available” as the anesthesiologist’s being “physically located within the same area as the CRNA, e.g., in the same operative suite, or in the same labor and delivery unit, or in the same procedure room, and not otherwise occupied in a way that prevents him/her from immediately conducting hands-on intervention, if needed.” The most controversial provisions of the revised Interpretive Guidelines are based on a tortuous effort to define "anesthesia" as distinct from conscious sedation, minimal sedation, anxiolysis– and as distinct from "analgesia". The patent objective of the anesthesia/ analgesia differentiation was to declare labor
  • 5. epidurals to be non-anesthesia services that could be performed by unsupervised nurse anesthetists even in states that have not opted out of the requirement that CRNAs provide anesthesia under the supervision of an anesthesiologist of the "operating practitioner." The issuance of the Revised Interpretive Guidelines immediately gave rise to a listserv discussion among Anesthesia Administration Assembly (AAA) members as to whether anesthesiology practices could indeed start to relieve their physicians from supervising CRNAs in the labor and delivery suite. It would appear that the new interpretation permits precisely that. It is important to note, however, that the federal regulations themselves have not changed at all- the CMS Survey & Certification personnel who write the Interpretive Guidelines have simply rewritten surveyor instructions in a way designed to permit CRNAs to perform spinals and epidurals for obstetrical patients in every hospital willing to grant the CRNAs such privileges, regardless of whether the state in which the hospital is located has opted out of the Medicare Conditions of Participations'– supervision requirement. Whether this rewrite will stand remains to be seen. As stated in its Analysis of New Anesthesia Interpretive Guidelines for Hospitals, "ASA is concerned that these changes may not have followed provisions in the Administrative Procedures Act and will address this issue as well as other concerns related to the guideline revisions with CMS." For the time being, the conservative course of action would be to defer any staffing changes until the matter is fully clarified. Despite closing on a note of confusion, we promise you that we will continue to do our best to shed early and practical enlightenment on the many changes that lie ahead for anesthesia practices. With best wishes, Tony Mira President and CEO If you have any questions or would like additional information please call 517- 787-6440 x 4113, send an email to info@anesthesiallc.com, or visit our website at www.anesthesiallc.com.