Dr. david caballero (meteogrid) “ground truth survey in spain”

Uploaded on


More in: Travel
  • Full Name Full Name Comment goes here.
    Are you sure you want to
    Your message goes here
    Be the first to comment
    Be the first to like this
No Downloads


Total Views
On Slideshare
From Embeds
Number of Embeds



Embeds 0

No embeds

Report content

Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

    No notes for slide


  • 1. Ground truth survey in Spain D. Caballero ArcFuel Workshop Thessaloniki 2013
  • 2. Spanish study area • Provinces of Córdoba and Málaga, Andalucía, Spain • Córdoba is one of the largest provinces in Spain. • Both hold forestlands in a rough terrain, shrublands and agricultural lands
  • 3. Spanish study area
  • 4. Survey points • • • • LUCAS points (P) Alternative points (ALT) Complementary points (PC) Other review activity (Fotos)
  • 5. Survey points
  • 6. Method • Geo-tagged pictures • Recordings and annotations for every photo set • GPS antenna linked (BT) to tablet with OruxMaps and Google Earth (cached) • Taken 8 pics (N, NE, E, SE, S, SW, W, NW), Upslope, Dwnslope, Canopy, Ground • Extra pictures showing the environment
  • 7. Navigation to survey points Geo-One GPS receiver attached to a Nikon D7000 camera
  • 8. Navigation to survey points
  • 9. Difficulties • Private properties! Almost no access, everything with fences! • Topography, very steep slopes • Vegetation: dense vegetation with thorns (Ulex sp) • Hunting activty (specially at dusk), bullfighting bulls • Winter time, short daylight hours • Look for alternative points, jump fences and a lot of walking -> reduced performance
  • 10. Survey - Spain • Poor accessbility -> alternative points of the same structure • A total of 56 points, 58 surveyed, one outside study area (Seville), one missing information
  • 11. Survey - Spain • • • • • • • • 1 EG Broad Scrub 2 EG Broad Open 3 EG Broad Dense 7 EG Conif Scrub 15 EG Mix Dense 19 Shrubs 20 Grasses 24 No fuel 1 5 4 1 2 30 5 4
  • 12. ArcFuel Classification • Classification of points according ArcFuel Map: depends on precision and resolution • Complicated in highly fragmented fuels • Suggestion: adaptative resolution (according fuel fragmentation) • Suggestion: use of LiDAR
  • 13. Classification results • Good for urban areas, it should be tested in dense intermix areas (i.e. North of Cordoba city) • EG Broad Scrub vs. Open: no so clear the difference sometimes. Required data on height (LiDAR) • In general good classifying dense forests
  • 14. Classification results • Missing EG Broad Dense for EG Conif Scrub (PC03A) • Missing EG Conif Scrub for Shrub! (P4) • Missing Shrub for EG Broad Dense (PC05A) • Missing EG Conif Dense for Agrofor (P27) • Missing EG Mix Dense for EG Broad Dense (PC38A, PC04A)
  • 15. Classification results • Good classifying shrubs (80%), but many different formations and structures included as shrubs (see comments) Missing Shrubs for Grasses, Shrubs for Agrofor -> abandoned lands PC10A, P35ALT, PC35A, P52ALT • Missing Grasses for Shrubs, difficult to differenciate (shrub density) P45, P47ALT
  • 16. Conclusions • 34 points well classified (60%) • 3 points very badly classified, wrong or inconsistent data sources • 8 points badly classified, difficult to differentate heights, densities, species • 11 with reasonable classification, particularly abandoned agro lands, outdated data sources (19%)
  • 17. Conclusions • Need for more information on shrubs • Design and apply a robust method to classify shrubs in the understory • Use of temporal and thematically consistent data sources • Use of LiDAR (where available) may help in future classifications