Innovation, EU & Regions: A Way Out of Poverty?

Loading...

Flash Player 9 (or above) is needed to view presentations.
We have detected that you do not have it on your computer. To install it, go here.

0 comments

Post a comment

    Post a comment
    Embed Video
    Edit your comment Cancel

    Favorites, Groups & Events

    Innovation, EU & Regions: A Way Out of Poverty? - Presentation Transcript

    1. I NNOVATION, EU AND REGIONS: A WAY OUT OF POVERTY? Project 17: Project Leader: Prf. Dr. rer.pol. Bettina Burger-Menzel Team composition: MARÍA ANDREA VÁSQUEZ CASTILLO CHRISTINE LESSMANN JUSTINA SAKALYTE IEVA NAUJALYTE CRISTINA SALA LIDÓN MARC JUANOLA MONÉ
    2. Contents
      • Introduction
      • Why Germany, Lithuania and Spain?
      • Economic Background
      • Study Case
      • Lithuania’s survey
      • Conclusions
    3. 1. Introduction
      • Germany, Spain and Lithuania as the EU members
      • Role of the innovation in the develop ment of the countries.
      • Structural and technological changes and their effects into the economies.
    4. 2. Why Germany, Lithuania and Spain?
      • Innovation Leaders: Germany
      • Catching-up Countries: Lithuania
      • Trailing Countries: Spain
    5. 2. Why Germany, Lithuania and Spain? Source: European Innovation Scoreboard 2006
      • Innovation Dimensions
      • Inputs
      • Innovation drivers: S&T graduates
      • Knowledge creation: Expenditure on R&D
      • Innovation & Entrepreneurship: Expenditure on ICT
      • Outputs
      • Application: Employ. Med/high-tech manf. , High-Tech Exports
      • Intellectual Property: Patent applications
      2. Why Germany, Lithuania and Spain? Source: European Innovation Scoreboard 2006
    6. 3. Economic Background Germany Source: Eurostat “Structural Indicators and long-term Indicators” 17,1* 18,3 16,0* 19,6 Business investment as a percentage of GDP 0,9* 2,4 -0,8 6,7 Foreign direct investment intensity 8,7 8,6 9,5 7,2 Unemployment rate (as % of active population) 2,2 2,4 1,9 1,4 Inflation rate (average annual) 0,6* 1,5 0,4* 1,9 Total employment growth (annual % change) 1,6 3,9 0,9 3,2 Real GDP growth rate (% change previous year) 100 100 108,2 112,1 GDP per capita in PPS (EU25=100) 2005 2000 2005 2000 EU 25 National Performance INDICATORS 
    7. 3. Economic Background Lithuania Source: Eurostat “Structural Indicators and long-term Indicators” 17,1* 18,3 18.0* 16.0 Business investment as a percentage of GDP 0,9* 2,4 0.6* 1.7 Foreign direct investment intensity 8,7 8,6 11.0 1.6 Unemployment rate (as % of active population) 2,2 2,4 1.1 0.9 Inflation rate (average annual) 0,6* 1,5 2.4 -3.7 Total employment growth (annual % change) 1,6 3,9 6.7 3.9 Real GDP growth rate (% change previous year) 100 100 48.1 38.5 GDP per capita in PPS (EU25=100) 2005 2000 2005 2000 EU 25   National Performance   INDICATORS 
    8. 3. Economic Background Spain Source: Eurostat “Structural Indicators and long-term Indicators” 17,1* 18,3 24.5 22.8 Business investment as a percentage of GDP 0,9* 2,4 3.2 8.4 Foreign direct investment intensity 8,7 8,6 9.2 11.1 Unemployment rate (as % of active population) 2,2 2,4 3.4 3.5 Inflation rate (average annual) 0,6* 1,5 2.6 5.1 Total employment growth (annual % change) 1,6 3,9 3.4 5 Real GDP growth rate (% change previous year) 100 100 98.3 91.3 GDP per capita in PPS (EU25=100) 2005 2000 2005 2000 EU 25   National Performance   INDICATORS 
    9. 4. Study Case
      • Definition of NIS (National Innovation System)
      • ” The network of institutions in the public and private sectors whose activities and interactions initiate, import, modify and diffuse new technologies may be described as the “National Systems of Innovation ”
      • Source: Freeman, C. (1987); Technology Policy and Economic Performance – Lessons from Japan; Pinter Publishers, London.
    10. 4. Study Case Innovation Indicators Innovation System Innovation Actors
      • Education
      • R&D
      • Implementation
      • Financing
      • Networking
      • Demand
      • Regulation and Competition
      • Citizen
      • Enterprice
      • State
      Source: DIW 2006 – Innovationsindikator Deutschland 2006
    11. 4. Study Case
      • Analysis of inputs and outputs some innovation indicators:
        • Education System
        • Research and development
        • Implementation
      • Germany, Lithuania and Spain
    12. 4. Study Case
      • Education : It is very important for the innovation ability. The society can be innovative o nly with qualified person nel , intelligent engineers and creative scientist s .
    13. 4. Study Case Output: Science and Technology ( S&T ) graduates per 1000 population between the age of 20 - 29 Output: Employment in high and medium high technology manufacturing sector - % total employment rate
    14. 4. Study Case
      • Research & Development (R&D): It is actually the branch of high technology where the needs for developing creative ideas and their conversion into innovation exist
    15. 4. Study Case
    16. 4. Study Case
      • Implementation of the innovation in the production: The process of the innovation reaches its target, if the companies make realisation of the products and services or procedures i n the market.
    17. 4. Study Case
    18. 6. Conclusions
    19. 6. Conclusions
      • GERMANY – leader.
          • Weakness in HR investment
          • Strength in use HR in high-tech industry
      • SPAIN – trailer.
          • Weakness in no efficient use of HR in high-tech industry
          • Strenght in investment in HR  intelectual property
      • LITHUANIA – catching-up.
          • Weakness: apparently not efficient use of HR in high-tech industry BUT the „ survey “ reveals that Lithuania uses HR in a different way.
          • Strenght: absortive capacity for new ideas and technology innovation in all given industries, including services.
    20. TUSEN TAKK
    SlideShare Zeitgeist 2009

    + andreavcandreavc Nominate

    custom

    85 views, 0 favs, 0 embeds more stats

    Euroweek 2007 Norway Telemark Bo Student Project wi more

    More info about this document

    © All Rights Reserved

    Go to text version

    • Total Views 85
      • 85 on SlideShare
      • 0 from embeds
    • Comments 0
    • Favorites 0
    • Downloads 0
    Most viewed embeds

    more

    All embeds

    less

    Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
    Flag as inappropriate

    Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate. If needed, use the feedback form to let us know more details.

    Cancel
    File a copyright complaint
    Having problems? Go to our helpdesk?

    Categories