Player Classification in Games via Game Analytics

1,070 views
970 views

Published on

We present a study focused on constructing models of players for the major commercial title Tomb Raider: Underworld (TRU). Emergent self-organizing maps are trained on high-level playing behavior data obtained from 1365 players that completed the TRU game. The unsupervised learning approach utilized reveals four types of players which are analyzed within the context of the game. The method can be applied directly in other games. For more info see: http://andersdrachen.files.wordpress.com/2011/01/tombraider_modeling_ieeecig.pdf

0 Comments
3 Likes
Statistics
Notes
  • Be the first to comment

No Downloads
Views
Total views
1,070
On SlideShare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
4
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
37
Comments
0
Likes
3
Embeds 0
No embeds

No notes for slide
  • Examples of usertelemetry
  • Player Classification in Games via Game Analytics

    1. 1. Player Behavior andPlay ExperienceChristian Thurau, Anders Drachen<br />
    2. 2. Whoweare<br />Christian Thurau, Fraunhofer IAIS<br />Anders Drachen, Aalborg University<br />Whatwe do<br />
    3. 3. Player behavior<br />Player behavior - definition:<br />Everything a playerdoes in the game<br />Moving an avatar<br />Interacting with otherplayers<br />Exploring an environment<br />Assigningorders to units<br />Navigating a storyline<br />Etc. <br />
    4. 4. Behavior and PX<br />Behavior is relevant whenconsidering PX: <br />Behavioranalysisinforms PX evaluations<br />Behavior analysis provides evidence on PX problems <br />Lack of progress<br />Interference by other players<br />No attention to surroundings<br />GUI issues<br />Behavioral analysis can be carried out at multiple scales – from one player to millions<br />Distilling behavior into classes provides the means to detect unwanted behavior and address the root causes (e.g. archetype analysis)<br />Testing and refining game design <br />
    5. 5. User behavior<br />Behavioranalysis: Recent complement to GUR methods:<br />Usabilitytesting: Can the useroperate the controls?<br />Playabilitytesting: Is the userhaving a goodexperience?<br />Behavioranalysis: What is the userdoingwhileplaying?<br />
    6. 6. User behavior<br />Behaviortraditionallyexploredusingobservation and video capture. <br />Games todaycanbecomplex -> challengestraditional GUR methods<br />Enter: game telemetry<br />Used in general IT sector for 20+ years – only a fewyearswidespreaduse in games (acrossdisciplines – AI, storytelling systems, design…)<br />
    7. 7. User behavior<br />Game telemetry is anythingthatcanberecorded from a game by an application!<br />Player movement<br />Firing weapons & usingabilities<br />Information flow betweenplayers<br />Measures of revenue<br />Social networkbetweenplayers<br />GUI interaction<br />Game economybehavior<br />….<br />
    8. 8. User behavior<br />Game telemetry data: <br />Highlydetailed<br />Large or small samples<br />Unobtrusive<br />Canbecombinedwithqualitativemethods<br />Answers ”what” and ”who” in game design<br />Inferenceonly for ”why” – onlyindirect info on PX<br />(usually … - smart people in AI arebuilding models for predicting PX and adapting games in real-time) <br />
    9. 9. Gettingtelemetry data<br />
    10. 10. Game telemetry<br />
    11. 11.
    12. 12. User behavior<br />Telemetry notably widelyused for online social games <br />Facebook games<br />MMOGs<br />Virtual worlds<br />Casual games<br />These games have a long lifetime = important to monitor usercommunity<br />Evaluatedynamics in usercommunity<br />Detectdisruptiveuserbehavior<br />
    13. 13. User behavior<br />Metricsuse in other game genres catchingup<br />Industry racing to adoptmethods - companieshiring<br />All major publishersrunninginitiatives<br />250+ members in the IGDA GUR SIG<br />2ndGUR summit: 70+ participants <br />Specializedvendors (e.g. game analytics, kontagent)<br />Exponentialincrease in research publications<br />Strongindustry-academiacollaborations<br />First book on the way (spring 2012)<br />
    14. 14. Userbehavior<br />Implications for research and development: The promise ofBig Data -andBig Depth<br />Populations not samples<br />Wide range of applications<br />Measuringhowusersinteract with games and eachother<br />Combiningmetrics with other measures for in-depthuser studies – notably PX<br />
    15. 15. Player BehaviorClassification<br />
    16. 16. Patterns of play<br />Player behaviorclassificationvia game telemetry– aims:<br />Distillcomplex datasets to find patterns of behavior[data mining]<br />Debugging the playingexperience<br />Comparingbehavior with design intent<br />Optimization of game design <br />Adaptation: Real-time dynamic adaptation to player type <br />
    17. 17. Patterns of play<br />Fundamental challenge: reducedimensionality<br />Can have thousands of behavioral variables (features)<br />Find the mostimportantbehavioral variables and classifyplayersaccording to these<br />Multiple methodsfor doingthis – all require a human component (deciding the number of classes!)<br />Lack ofcomparison of methods<br />
    18. 18. Patterns of play<br />Wecompared:<br />K-meansclustering<br />C-means, <br />Non-Negative Matrix Factorization<br />Principal Components Analysis<br />Archetype Analysis<br />Otherapproaches: e.g. self-organizingmaps<br />Common - usedbefore<br />in behavior<br />analysis<br />New – from economics<br />
    19. 19. Patterns of play<br />Evaluated70k playersof World of Warcraft<br />Substantialvariationsin the resultsoffered by the differentmethods (!)<br />Differentnumber of classes<br />Differentproperty distribution in classes<br />Clear challenges to behavioralclassification<br />Scalingeffects<br />Data types vs. algorithm<br />Potential temporal effects (time-series analysis etc.)<br />
    20. 20. Thank you<br />

    ×