All Aboard the Databus
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5
×
 

All Aboard the Databus

on

  • 1,057 views

This talk was given by Shirshanka Das (Staff Software Engineer @ LinkedIn) at the 3rd ACM Symposium on Cloud Computing (SOCC 2012).

This talk was given by Shirshanka Das (Staff Software Engineer @ LinkedIn) at the 3rd ACM Symposium on Cloud Computing (SOCC 2012).

Statistics

Views

Total Views
1,057
Views on SlideShare
1,056
Embed Views
1

Actions

Likes
1
Downloads
29
Comments
0

1 Embed 1

http://www.docshut.com 1

Accessibility

Categories

Upload Details

Uploaded via as Adobe PDF

Usage Rights

© All Rights Reserved

Report content

Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
  • Full Name Full Name Comment goes here.
    Are you sure you want to
    Your message goes here
    Processing…
Post Comment
Edit your comment

All Aboard the Databus All Aboard the Databus Presentation Transcript

  • All Aboard the Databus!LinkedIn’s Change Data Capture Pipeline SOCC 2012 Oct 16thDatabus Team @ LinkedInShirshanka Dashttp://www.linkedin.com/in/shirshankadas@shirshanka Recruiting Solutions
  • The Consequence of SpecializationData Flow is essentialData Consistency is critical !!!
  • The Consistent Data Flow problem
  • Two WaysApplication code dual writes to Extract changes from databasedatabase and messaging system commit log Easy Hard Consistent? Consistent!!!
  • The Result: Databus Standar Standar Standar Standar Standar Standar Standar Standar Updates Standar dization Search dization Graph dization Read dization dization dization dization Index dization Index dization Replicas Primary DB Data Change Events Databus 5
  • Key Design Decisions Logical clocks attached to the source – Physical offsets are only used for internal transport – Simplifies data portability User-space – Filtering, Projections – Typically network-bound -> can burn more CPU Isolate fast consumers from slow consumers – Workload separation between online, catchup, bootstrap. Pull model – Restarts are simple – Derived State = f (Source state, Clock) – + Idempotence = Consistent! 6
  • Databus: First attempt Issues  Source database pressure  GC on the Relay  Java serialization
  • Current Architecture Four Logical Components  Fetcher – Fetch from db, relay…  Log Store – Store log snippet  Snapshot Store – Store moving data snapshot  Subscription Client – Orchestrate pull across these
  • The Relay Change event buffering (~ 2 – 7 days) Low latency (10-15 ms) Filtering, Projection Hundreds of consumers per relay Scale-out, High-availability through redundancy
  • The Bootstrap Service Catch-all for slow / new consumers Isolate source OLTP instance from large scans Log Store + Snapshot Store Optimizations – Periodic merge – Predicate push-down – Catch-up versus full bootstrap Guaranteed progress for consumers via chunking Implementations – MySQL – Files
  • The Client Library Glue between Databus infra and business logic in the consumer Switches between relay and bootstrap as needed API – Callback with transactions – Iterators over windows
  • Partitioning the Stream Server-side filtering – Range, mod, hash – Allows client to control partitioning function Consumer groups – Distribute partitions evenly across a group – Move partitions to available consumers on failure – Minimize re-processing
  • Meta-data Management Event definition, serialization and transport – Avro Oracle, MySQL – Table schema generates Avro definition Schema evolution – Only backwards-compatible changes allowed Isolation between upgrades on producer and consumer
  • Fetcher Implementations Oracle – Trigger-based (see paper for details) MySQL – Custom-storage-engine based (see paper for details) In Labs – Alternative implementations for Oracle – OpenReplicator integration for MySQL
  • Experience in Production: The Good Source isolation: Bootstrap benefits – Typically, data extracted from sources just once – Bootstrap service routinely used to satisfy new or slow consumers Common Data Format – Early versions used hand-written Java classes for schema  Too brittle – Java classes also meant many different serializations for versions of the classes – Avro offers ease-of-use flexibility & performance improvements (no re-marshaling) Rich Subscription Support – Example: Search, Relevance
  • Experience in Production: The Bad Oracle Fetcher Performance Bottlenecks – Complex joins – BLOBS and CLOBS – High update rate driven contention on trigger table Bootstrap: Snapshot store seeding – Consistent snapshot extraction from large sources – Complex joins hurt when trying to create exactly the same results
  • What’s Next? Investigate alternate Oracle implementations Externalize joins outside the source Reduce latency further, scale to thousands of consumers per relay – Poll  Streaming User-defined processing Eventually-consistent systems Open-source: Q4 2012
  • Recruiting Solutions 18
  • Appendix 19
  • Consumer Throughput / Update rate Summary  Network bound
  • End-to-end Latency Summary  Network bound  5 – 10 ms overhead
  • Bootstrapping efficiency Summary  Break-even at 50% insert:update ratio
  • The Callback API
  • Timeline Consistency