Evaluation of online learning (Rubric to evaluate online courses) Evolution items Your comments Degree (1-5) The first thing that you see when looking at the course is its design. Is the design pleasing to the eye? Is the Design site cluttered or difficult to navigate? Are there any glaring design flaws or glitches, or is the site a work of art? What is the focus of the course? If you can’t figure it out, then the author is doing something wrong. Focus Focus should be apparent without hunting around too much. Typically by using design elements, or simple headlines or sub-headlines a site must convey its focus. The most obvious element to cover in your review is the course’s content. Does the content of the course match Content its focus? If not, there is a problem! Is the content easily readable? Does it make sense? What are some of the highlights? Is there a page, article or section of the course that really stands out as being fantastic? Writing style is one element that many people often ignore. Does the author share his/her voice? Do you find yourself relating to what you Writing Style read? Is the style professional or does the author blabs on about their dying goldfish in every post?
Does the course use proper grammatical elements? Are there Grammar and spelling mistakes and punctuation Punctuation errors all over the place? Overall, do you find that the site isMessage Effectiveness effective in putting out its message? Who is the intended audience for this site or blog? Are the intended and Course Audience actual audiences different?