Context Adaptive Digital Maps on Public Displays

Loading...

Flash Player 9 (or above) is needed to view presentations.
We have detected that you do not have it on your computer. To install it, go here.

0 comments

Post a comment

    Post a comment
    Embed Video
    Edit your comment Cancel

    Favorites, Groups & Events

    Context Adaptive Digital Maps on Public Displays - Presentation Transcript

    1. Context-Adaptive Digital Maps for Public Displays Amenity Applewhite Context-Adaptive Digital Signage Seminar Summer 2008
    2. Outline
    3. Outline • Introduction
    4. Outline • Introduction • Related work
    5. Outline • Introduction • Related work • Initial user study
    6. Outline • Introduction • Related work • Initial user study • Prototype design
    7. Outline • Introduction • Related work • Initial user study • Prototype design • Second user study
    8. Outline • Introduction • Related work • Initial user study • Prototype design • Second user study • Recommendations
    9. Outline • Introduction • Related work • Initial user study • Prototype design • Second user study • Recommendations • Conclusion
    10. Introduction
    11. Introduction • 20 MobiDiC Signs
    12. Introduction • 20 MobiDiC Signs • Map content
    13. Introduction • 20 MobiDiC Signs • Map content • Requirements analysis
    14. Introduction • 20 MobiDiC Signs • Map content • Requirements analysis • User-Centered Design
    15. Introduction • 20 MobiDiC Signs • Map content • Requirements analysis • User-Centered Design • Context- dependence
    16. Related work Public displays * • Small • Eye-level *Huang et al. 2008 **Abowd and Dey 1999 ***Schmidt-Belz 2003
    17. Related work Public displays * • Small • Eye-level Context-adaptive** • Location, identity, activity, time • Advantageous*** *Huang et al. 2008 **Abowd and Dey 1999 ***Schmidt-Belz 2003
    18. Related work Public displays * • Small • Eye-level Context-adaptive** • Location, identity, activity, time • Advantageous*** *Huang et al. 2008 **Abowd and Dey 1999 ***Schmidt-Belz 2003
    19. Related work Public displays * • Small • Eye-level Context-adaptive** • Location, identity, activity, time • Advantageous*** *Huang et al. 2008 **Abowd and Dey 1999 ***Schmidt-Belz 2003
    20. Related work Public displays * • Small • Eye-level Context-adaptive** • Location, identity, activity, time • Advantageous*** *Huang et al. 2008 **Abowd and Dey 1999 ***Schmidt-Belz 2003
    21. Related work ISO 13407 HCD design for interactive systems
    22. Related work Designers of digital maps would benefit from using HCD more often.* *Nivala 2005
    23. Related work Designers of digital maps would benefit from using HCD more often.* *Nivala 2005
    24. Related work Designers of digital maps would benefit from using HCD more often.* *Nivala 2005
    25. Related work *Erdelez 1999
    26. Related work Information encountering * *Erdelez 1999
    27. Related work Information encountering * • Information science concept *Erdelez 1999
    28. Related work Information encountering * • Information science concept • occurs as part of a routine activity not performed to obtain information *Erdelez 1999
    29. Related work Information encountering * • Information science concept • occurs as part of a routine activity not performed to obtain information • useful information  positive encounters *Erdelez 1999
    30. Initial user study Purpose determine the types of maps pedestrians would like to have displayed and the effect of context on map content
    31. Initial user study Scenario Wochenmarkt at the Domplatz Saturday morning
    32. Initial user study Method short informal digitally recorded interviews with 11 subjects, aged 21-56
    33. Initial user study Results • No one needed or would need a map. • Positive response. • Everyone suggested a tourist map. • People liked the idea of a map of pubs with happy hours, a map of football games, and a map of pharmacies. • Little feedback on temporal adaptation.
    34. Prototype development 9 maps, a range of context adaptation Location global  continental  city  neighborhood Time static  weekly  daily  hourly
    35. • Temporally static • City scale
    36. • Neighborhood scale • Temporally adaptive: hourly, daily, weekly
    37. • Global scale • Temporally adaptive: hourly, weekly
    38. • Continent scale • Daily adaptation • Global scale • Static
    39. Second user study Purpose elicit user-feedback on prototypes
    40. Second user study Part I Saturday, Domplatz showed pedestrians maps in stack, brought to phone booth, voice recorded; 7 interviewees aged 21-35
    41. Survey Participants 0 2 4 6 lan dm 8 ar ks sc ul pt ur es sh op pi ph n g ar m ac ies pu bs fo ot ba wo ll r ld ne w s flig ht s ve g . im po rt s Favorite Second user study Part I Results Would look at
    42. Second user study Part II Saturday morning, Wednesday morning, Friday evening; participants choose favorites from maps taped in phone booth; 30 people
    43. Participants who would use the map 0 3 6 9 lan 12 dm ar ks sc ul pt ur es sh op pi ph n g ar m ac ies pu bs fo ot ba wo ll r ld ne w s flig ht ve s g . im po rt s Friday evening Satuday morning Second user study Part II Results Wednesday morning
    44. Second user study Part I & Part II Discussion • On-the-spot interviews reduced the number of maps considered useful. • The favorites chosen - shopping, pubs, and world news - were the same in both studies. • The favorite maps were context-adaptive: location neighborhood scale time hourly/daily/weekly updates • Clear preference for certain maps at certain times.
    45. Requirement recommendations • Practical content for a small screen. • Present information that is novel, interesting, or useful enough to encourage future interaction. • Not all novel, interesting, or useful information belongs on a map.
    46. Requirement recommendations The most appealing map content adapts to context: • large-scale map with user’s location • presenting information when it is most relevant to the user • possible to adapt the content to identity
    47. Conclusions • UCD - • Paper prototypes - • Various interview techniques - • Context-adaptive maps -
    48. Conclusions • UCD - Good! • Paper prototypes - • Various interview techniques - • Context-adaptive maps -
    49. Conclusions • UCD - Good! • Paper prototypes - Good! • Various interview techniques - • Context-adaptive maps -
    50. Conclusions • UCD - Good! • Paper prototypes - Good! • Various interview techniques - Good! • Context-adaptive maps -
    51. Conclusions • UCD - Good! • Paper prototypes - Good! • Various interview techniques - Good! • Context-adaptive maps - Good!
    52. Thank you. Questions?

    + Amenity ApplewhiteAmenity Applewhite, 2 years ago

    custom

    465 views, 0 favs, 1 embeds more stats

    Requirements analysis for a map application on digi more

    More info about this document

    © All Rights Reserved

    Go to text version

    • Total Views 465
      • 464 on SlideShare
      • 1 from embeds
    • Comments 0
    • Favorites 0
    • Downloads 8
    Most viewed embeds
    • 1 views on http://www.fachak.com

    more

    All embeds
    • 1 views on http://www.fachak.com

    less

    Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
    Flag as inappropriate

    Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate. If needed, use the feedback form to let us know more details.

    Cancel
    File a copyright complaint
    Having problems? Go to our helpdesk?

    Categories